1
Sources of character
What is character in fiction? The short answer: everything. The fiction we read is presented by and through its characters. Even a story without people, say about elephants or extraterrestrials, is still about characters because fiction is written by people for other people to read. Fiction happens by and through beings to whom human readers respond with human understanding and human emotions. Character is so deeply integral to fiction that itâs often assumed in discussions of fiction rather than explicitly presented.
Character is at the heart of fiction. This means:
⢠The reader connects with fiction through its characters.
⢠What happens in fiction â the story and plot â is presented through characters.
⢠What a work of fiction means â the theme â is revealed by what happens to the characters.
Write a one- or two-page start of a piece of fiction (300â500 words) in which no character is present. You can describe a scene, a place, or setting. Write in the third person. Take no more than ten minutes to write this. Then leave it for ten minutes and read it over. Explain to yourself what is has to do with character.
What is character?
Look at the opening chapter of Thomas Hardyâs novel The Return of the Native (1878). Hardy labels all the chapter headings. The second chapter is labelled, âHumanity appears on the scene.â In other words, only in the second chapter does a character appear; the first chapter, it would seem, is devoid of character. Here is its opening:
Chapter 1
A face on which time makes but little impression
A Saturday afternoon in November was approaching the time of twilight, and the vast tract of unenclosed wild known as Egdon Heath embrowned itself moment by moment. Overhead the hollow stretch of whitish cloud shutting out the sky was as a tent which had the whole heath for its floor.
From the very start, the chapter label in referring to the landscape as âA faceâ brings in a human characteristic. Naming the day, the time of day, and the month refers to human culture. And the simile ending the second sentence brings human scale to the otherwise impersonal scene by comparing it to âa tent which had the whole heath for its floorâ.
This is the next paragraph:
The heaven being spread with this pallid screen and the earth with the darkest vegetation, their meeting-line at the horizon was clearly marked. In such contrast the heath wore the appearance of an instalment of night which had taken up its place before its astronomical hour was come: darkness had to a great extent arrived hereon, while the day stood distinct in the sky. Looking upwards, a furze-cutter would have been inclined to continue work; looking down, he would have decided to finish his faggot and go home. The distant rims of the world and of the firmament seemed to be a division in time no less than a division in matter. The face of the heath by its mere complexion added half an hour to evening; it could in like manner retard the dawn, sadden noon, anticipate the frowning of storms scarcely generated, and intensify the opacity of a moonless midnight to a cause of shaking and dread.
The first two sentences above are descriptive narrative devoid of human reference: âpallid screenâ and âdarkest vegetationâ are largely generalizations without colour or form. The paragraph continues with even more abstract language: âan instalment of nightâ, âastronomical hourâ, and âday stood distinct in the skyâ. But then a hypothetical person appears, âa furze-cutterâ, who brings life to the otherwise unmoving scene. If he looks up, heâll continue cutting the fodder; if he looks down into the dark, heâll finish his bundle and go home. Hardy not only creates life and movement with this âcharacterâ, he creates a sense of scale â the lone human figure in the midst of this vast open space.
The sentence that ends the paragraph doesnât refer to a particular person, but it does express a range of human emotions in describing the effects of this strange darkening: the âfaceâ of the heath has this âcomplexionâ; it can âsadden noonâ, âanticipate the frowning of stormsâ, and turn âmoonless midnight to a cause of shaking and dreadâ (my emphases). In this way, sadness, anger and fear are evoked by the premature dark of the landscape, and the reader relates the landscape to human emotion.
Writing can therefore be said to have âcharacterâ without having any characters, but by making a variety of references to human physical, psychological and emotional traits.
Finding sources of character
The most basic source of writersâ characters is the actual writer. This doesnât mean that writers, especially experienced writers, are essentially just writing about themselves. But most people tend to project themselves into imagining other people. Their ideas about others also involve ideas about themselves. This is also true of writers.
The writerâs life is the ultimate source of fictional characters.
In addition to themselves, writers also model characters and aspects of characters on their immediate families. Parents and siblings and spouses and partners and children serve in whole or part as models for characters and for relationships between characters. Writers use immediate and extended family memories to model characters of and at different ages. Friends and acquaintances can also be used in these ways. This means that the fictional character can be built from a number of ârealâ traits in different people observed and recalled by the writer. This composite character becomes a whole character â someone else â in the creation of the work of fiction.
ASPECTS OF CHARACTER: HUMBOLDTâS GIFT
Many readers of Saul Bellowâs 1975 novel Humboldtâs Gift know that the title character, Von Humboldt Fleisher, is closely modelled on Bellowâs friend and one-time mentor Delmore Schwartz, talented poet and prose writer, New York intellectual par excellence, and alcoholic manic-depressive.
Bellow even names the character as an exaggerated, comic rendition of Delmore Schwartz, with his unusual first name and common, often Jewish, surname Schwartz meaning âblackâ. The âDelâ morphs into the German âvonâ and the âmoreâ into âHumboldtâ, so that his first name suggests great intellect and achievement â the von Humboldt brothers Wilhelm and Alexander being between them philosopher, diplomat, linguist, educational theorist, scientific geographer and explorer. The surname âFleisherâ is a variant spelling of the German or Yiddish for âbutcherâ, suggesting the cruder part of Fleisher/Schwartzâs nature as paranoid alcoholic manic-depressive.
Nor does Bellow limit the modelling to the name and mental and psychological traits. He describes Humboldt physically as ââŚwith his wide-set gray eyes. He was fine as well as thick, heavy but also light.â âLater he got a prominent belly, like Babe Ruth. His legs were restless and his feet made nervous movements. Below, shuffling comedy; above, princeliness and dignity, a certain nutty charm.â These could be descriptions of Delmore Schwartz.
Whatâs more, the narrator and central character of the novel, Charlie Citrine, is a barely disguised version of Saul Bellow. Citrine is a famous prize-winning, wealthy writer. Films have been made of his books. Heâs divorced and has girlfriends and an ambivalent attitude to both Humboldt and to himself. At one point...