![]()
Part Three
Oaxaca, the Inframundo
To Puebla
Leaving the city, thinking of my students and the surprise of the handsome gift left in my car, I was glum with nostalgic melancholy. It was the effect of my detour to the border, my side trip to the coast, the end of the writing workshop. I wasnât busy anymore. The cure for idleness was to hit the road. I was not sad to leave Mexico Cityâmy heart sings whenever I leave a big city and see the thinning suburbs and first green hills beyond themâbut I was sad to leave the students, no longer students, but friends.
My destination was Puebla, and there was a direct route, southeast from where Iâd been shaken down. But this would have taken me through NezahualcĂłyotlâsinister âCiudad Nezaââthe densest district of Mexico City, and not only the most populous but the most violent, a place of cops much crookeder than the one who had just extorted me on a leafy boulevard in Roma Sur. Neza was notorious for its slums, its seedy underworld, gangs, drugs, and murderâin particular femicides, the rape and killing of womenâwhere I would also be impeded by the slow traffic through its barrios. By taking a detour, I would be in the countryside quicker, and far from the police.
I was soon in Texcoco and driving clockwise around the slopes of Monte Tlaloc, âthe ghost mountain,â with a temple to Tlaloc the storm god, the god of rain and fertility, on its summit at 13,600 feetâone of the highest archeological sites in the world, higher than Machu Picchu. Tlaloc is part of a trio of close-together volcanoes, with the 17,000-footers IztaccĂhuatl (the Woman in White) and PopocatĂ©petl (Smoking Mountain). PopocatĂ©petl was still smoking, still erupting, and the grandeur of this trio of steep, symmetrical flanks and peaks was apparent even cloaked in the brown grainy cloudbanks drifting from Mexico City.
A bit farther south I was traveling on the old Camino Real, which linked the great capital to Pueblaâthe Royal Road in name, but humble in reality, a thoroughfare of farms and cultivated land and small villages, passing through Calpulalpan (celebrated for its annual fair, during which, so the townâs tourist office boasted, âpeople feast on local specialtiesâmaguey worms, pulque, and owlsâ). This region of plowed fields provided the food for the big city. Keeping to this straight road, I connected to the autopista, paying a toll and sailing to Puebla.
At a service area near the town of San MartĂn Texmelucan de Labastida I stopped for gas. By now, as a road tripper, I had become accustomed to the routine of a Mexican pit stop, a model of efficiency and in many respects superior to its equivalent in the US. Because Mexico has abandoned its passenger trains, and depends on eighteen-wheelers to move its freight north to the border and beyond, and on its fleets of long-distance buses, its main highways are well maintained. The off-ramp always leads to the dusty antique pastâto the man plowing a stony field with a burro, to the woman with a bundle on her head, to the boy herding goats, to the ranchitos, the carne asada stands, the five-hundred-year-old churches, and a tienda, selling beer and snacks, with a skinny cat asleep on the tamales.
On the main road, the gas pumps at the service area are manned by attendants in uniforms. You drive in, say âLleno, por favorâ or âLlenarlo,â and the fellow fills the tank, washes your windows, earns a tip, and offers his elaborate thanks: âAt your service, sir.â
There will always be an OXXO convenience store at the service area, many of them the size of a small supermarket: beer, wine, T-shirts, hats, chips, automotive accessories, fireworks, balloons, lucky charms, first aid supplies, fruit, canned food, plastic toys, magazines, and newspapers. There will probably be a taco stand next door, or a chicken franchise like El Pollo Loco, staffed by pretty girls in paper hats. The restrooms will be guarded by a woman wrapped in a rebozo and wearing an apron. She will greet you and remind you that you will need to insert a 5-peso coin in the turnstile, and she might discreetly hand you four squares of stiff abrasive paper, expecting a tip. An enterprising man might be seated at a table near the gas pumps, selling watermelons or clay pots. In some of the larger service areas between the big cities there might be a brown motel of fake adobe, and some of the smaller ones feature a decent restaurant selling local food.
After the gasoline ritual, I parked and bought two tacos, a cup of coffee, and a copy of El Universal, and sat in the sunshine, reading the paper and blessing my luck. Iâd be in Puebla within an hour, and in three or four daysâI was in no hurryâin Oaxaca. But no sunny moment in Mexico is without a cloud. On an inside page of the paper, under a photo that looked like a gruesome car crash, I read a news item about how, just the day before, a carâthe vandalized and sticky one in the pictureâwas found in Veracruz with five human heads tied to the hood, the decapitated corpses stacked inside the car. Graffiti scratched into the carâs paint, a narcomensaje, indicated that it was the work of a cartel, the Jalisco New Generation.
âSending a messageâ was the usual explanation, an unambiguous message in this case, stating that this cartel was not to be trifled with. In 2017 there had been 2,200 criminal homicides in Veracruz state, most of them cartel related.
From here to Puebla, every flat area of the fertile landscape was a cultivated fieldâhardly a tree in sightâsmallholdings of green vegetables, onions or cabbages, lettuce or tomatoes. In the north, I had been used to seeing cactus and bleak stretches of desert, roads of washboard gravel, but here in southerly Puebla state the land was fertile, the fields were green, and people were hoeing, their backs bent, clawing at the soil, the iconic postures of peasants.
Passing Cholula, I thought of stopping for the night, but the traffic began to pile up around me, and pretty soon I was shouldered off the motorway by honking cars and, in a maze of narrow streets, going in the wrong direction. I knew I was lostâor at least far from the center of the cityâbecause the streets were slanted and asymmetrical. The oldest parts of a Mexican city, surveyed and laid out by the Spanish, were always arranged in a tight grid of right angles.
I pulled off the road, consulted the map on my phone, and got my bearings. But I was still in a single crawl of traffic on back streets, nowhere near the center of Puebla, passing a residential area of walled-in bungalows, cringing dogs, and tire repair shops.
Such is the revelation of the road trip. Someone says, âWe spent a week in Puebla,â and the name seems magical: colonial churches, houses roofed with red tiles, the ZĂłcalo lined with cafĂ©s and arcades, mole poblano drizzled on chicken, brassy music, perhaps folkloric dancingâtwirling skirts, stamping feet, shoeshine stalls and balloon sellers, the locals strolling, some of the women outfitted in the Frida Kahlo style, with the colorful Puebla dress, the china poblana outfit of an embroidered blouse and full skirt, perhaps a tiara of pompoms and a shawl and an apron thick with floral stitching. All that is accurate, but there is more.
Here is the reality. Puebla is not the compact colonial city it once was. No Mexican city with a romantic name fits that description. Never mind that it is more than five hundred years old. Puebla is a sprawling metropolis of more than four million people, with a Walmart and shopping malls and factoriesâone of the biggest textile factories in Mexico. It has a Volkswagen plant, another making Hyundais, and eleven industrial parks. Also the industry for which Puebla is most famous, the making of Talavera ceramicsânine such workshops.
There is not a big city in Mexicoâno matter how charming its plaza, how atmospheric its cathedral, how wonderful its food, or how illustrious its schoolsâthat is not in some way fundamentally grim, with a big-box store, a Samâs Club, and an industrial area, a periphery of urban ugliness that makes your heart sink. Because this is in Mundo Mexico, on the plain of snakes, its citizens are overlooked by the government, its workers exploited and underpaid, its teachers belittled, nearly all its city dwellers living in small spaces. But the people are making the best of it, because it was my experience that Mexicans might be mockers and teasers, but they are not idle complainers.
When an oppressed group in Mexico airs a grievance, it doesnât mumble. It takes to the streets with resolve, holds a demonstration in the main plaza, camps out in front of a ministry in a defiant vigil, burns a bus, blocks a motorway, or, in the case of the Zapatistas in Chiapas, arrives on horseback out of the jungle and declares an insurrection, taking over an entire state and eventually running it so well that the government (out of shame or indifference or confusion) turns its back on the rebels, pretends they donât exist, and allows them to create a better way of life.
I made my way through the Puebla suburbs, into the numbered streets and the square blocks, following the signs pointing to centro histĂłrico. Passing an older but solid hotel, its brick facade decorated with Talaveras, on a corner next to a churchâthe Hotel San JosĂ©âI parked and ran inside. Yes, they had plenty of rooms, $50 a night, walking distance to the ZĂłcalo and the museums. And that became my home for four nights.
After a long drive and a long walk, I strolled around the ZĂłcalo, where a klezmer group was playing. Klezmer? Yes, violins, guitars, a drum, a trumpet, a trombone. Two players were bearded, in black vests and black fedoras. None were Jewish, they told me later; they simply loved the sound. They had seen videos of klezmer music on the internet and decided to learn how to play its strangulated and sobbing tremolos, its flatulent oompahs, its Bulgarian syncopations, and its Polish mazurkas, bewitching the many Mexicans who crowded the arcade to hear it. One child was provoked to a stumbling dance at the feet of the fiddler, who was sawing his heart out with his eyes shut.
Looking for the famous seventeenth-century paintings in the cathedral on the ZĂłcalo the next day, I was distracted by a scene that reached back to the Spanish conquest: a tall, white-robed bishop in a sparkly white miter, carrying a gold shepherdâs crook, a white giant walking among a congregation of much smaller, much darker people. The bishop was attended by a priest in purple vestments, bearing a bucket. Wielding a dripping silver aspergillumâthe knobbed, hand-held sprinkling instrumentâthe bishop spattered holy water on the upturned faces of the faithful, bringing pious smiles of gratitude to those ritually moistened.
The paintings were soot-darkened and severe, the Altar of the Kings (of Spain) was overpainted and garish, containing the sculpted images of the kings, patrons of the church residing in niches. But two items stood out. One was a glass coffin with a life-size model of the naked Christ inside, lying supine, his tortured eyes turned toward heaven and covered in blood and deeply scored with spectacular lacerations. This was not old, but it was gory enough to be alarming.
And at a side altar, a painting depicting Father Miguel Pro, his arms extended as though crucified, being shot by a firing squad. This image, too, was fairly sooty, but I remembered the name of Father Pro from Graham Greene. He was fondly recalled by Greene in 1938 as the priest who had returned from studying in Europe to serve the faithful in 1926, when the anticlerical laws were being strictly enforced. Celebrating Mass in secret, in defiance of the government, Father Pro was arrested in 1927 on a trumped-up charge of attempting to assassinate a general (ObregĂłn, who was later killed by a militant Catholic for his anticlericalism). Far from quelling the Cristero Rebellion, the execution of Father Proâas shown in the paintingâgave the Cristeros a martyr. And the atmosphere of persecution provided Graham Greene with a plot: godless politicians, brutish soldiers, God-fearing peasants, churches under siege, and priests ministering the sacraments in covert rituals.
What Greene did not mention was that the churches reopened in 1929, except in the two reluctant states where he was traveling, and that the Cristero rebels were militant, crudely armed, but passionate Catholics, willing to commit murder for their faithâa formidable army howling âViva Cristo Rey!â and gunning for infidels. Though the states of Tabasco and Chiapas were suffering the vandalism of their churches, Mexico was being governed by LĂĄzaro CĂĄrdenas, a man mildly disparaged by Greene, whom most Mexicans believe to have been their most enlightened president. CĂĄrdenas was a pacifier: as he repealed the antichurch laws, he was trying to mollify the Cristeros in some states, and the persecutors of the Catholics in other states, while at the same time fending off foreign petrocrats and nationalizing the oil companies.
Puebla was an interlude in my road trip south, a four-day touristic pit stop. I fueled my walks with Pueblaâs wonderful food: mole poblanoâgoopy, spiced chocolate sauce over chicken; memelasâcorn cakes topped with cheese and tomato; molotesâstuffed pastry; chalupas topped with salsa and shredded meat. Hearty meals, stuffed buns, sticky sauces, and street food.
A museumgoer when I have nothing better to do, I avoid writing much about collections, because a visitor should enter a museum innocent of whatâs to come, be allowed to make discoveries, and not be nagged into seeing specific works. I had been humbled by the museums in Mexico City, especially by the treasures in the National Museum of Anthropologyâthe giant Olmec heads, the skull with staring bejeweled eyes and overlaid with a mosaic of turquoise, Moctezumaâs feathered headdress, and glittering mortuary masks, items harvested from ruins and tombs all over Mexico.
There were no treasures in Pueblaâs Museo Amparo to equal those. The Amparoâs small collection was housed in two old stone buildings on a side street. But I found something remarkable there, a Mexican artist obsessed with the grotesqueries of modern Mexico. Among the colonial paintings and ancient stone carvings was an artist Iâd never heard of and who seemed to me a true original. This was Yoshua OkĂłn, who described himself as a performance artist. Young (born in 1970) and widely traveled, he made videos as well as installations and sculptures. One of the sculptures in the Museo Amparo was a shimmering object of chrome and cast bronze, a thing of singular beauty that looked like a throne. And in a manner of speaking it was one, as its label stated: El Excusado / The Toilet. It was a superior hopper, as arresting as an Edward Hopper, of lovely proportions, made in the shape of the Museo Soumaya, âan emblem of Carlos Slimâs telecommunication empireâ and intended to mock both Slimâs museum (the Soumaya, in Mexico City) and Slimâs wealth, succeeding at both with devastating Mexican mockery.
Looping around that room was OkĂłnâs installation titled HCl, a symmetrical series of acrylic pipes, each pipe about six inches in diameter and running up and down the walls of two rooms, attractive as a well-made industrial masterpiece depicting the austere geometry of plumbing. This too, at first glance, was a wonderful thing, for the way the bold pipes surrounded the room. The pipes vividly churned with brownish-gray liquid, and the whole business was operated by a gulping, pumping contraption, as impressively made as Carlos Slimâs scale-model art museum that was also a âfunctioning, luxuryâ toilet.
âHCl is the formula for hydrochloric acid,â the label began, and explained that this acid is an aid to human digestion. Then the unexpected detail: the see-through pipes were filled with human vomit, âdonated by anonymous patients from a bulimic clinic.â You admire the artistry and form, and then, told what ...