3 Chapter 1
School climate changes over the years
The state’s involvement in schooling and how 1976 was a turning point from one educational age to another – a brief synopsis
What sort of climate should we want?
The teacher is the most important influence in the schooling system.
We have each spent a lifetime in state-provided education, first as pupils, then as teachers and finally in various leadership positions both in and out of schools. We have never stopped learning or making mistakes from which we like to think we have sometimes learned. We know that the best teachers use pupil mistakes as a positive opportunity to learn, and we believe that the same is true of ourselves and the other professionals with whom we have worked and to whom we owe so much. Our endeavour has always been to improve on previous best.
This book has been born out of a shared passion for education as it occurs in schools, where it can so often be transformative of children and young people’s lives. Teachers at their best – and we have witnessed myriad examples of this – change for the better the attitudes and future trajectory of young lives. We agree with the wisdom and judgement of Haim Ginott when he famously said: ‘I have come to a frightening conclusion. I am the decisive element in the classroom. It is my personal approach that creates the climate. It is my daily mood that makes the weather. As a teacher I possess tremendous power to make a child’s life miserable or joyous.’
4Nor do we disagree with Robert Fried’s judgement:
In our experience as pupils, we were each fortunate when we met such teachers and the ones who, as Fried says, ‘inspired us most’, and know of their effect on us. In our adult lives, in and around schools, we have witnessed the sometimes profound impact of a teacher on pupils and sought to spread it and improve the chances of it occurring more often and more widely. Dylan Wiliam is surely right when he reminds teachers in workshops that their individual effectiveness is the most significant influence on pupil success and that this can explain why variations in quality and outcome within a school are greater than that between schools.
But we also think that the school is powerfully influential too. It creates the ‘climate’ within which the teacher has a better or worse chance of making the best ‘weather’. That is why consideration of school improvement, which only surfaced as a concept with research by Michael Rutter at the very start of the period we have chosen to examine, is so important in the improvement of pupil experiences and outcomes that has occurred in our lifetimes.
To extend the search for improved schooling and pupil outcomes, we must also look beyond the school itself. The climate and the weather are affected deliberately (and indirectly by many other factors, such as the community and the socio-economic background of the individual families that the school serves) by two further agents: first, by the MAT and/or the local authority within which the school operates and, second, and most insistently, by central government through the secretary of state for education, the DfE and other central agencies such as the Office for 5Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted) and the Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual).
That is why we sought to interview some of the key civil servants and special advisers (SpAds), as well as the former secretaries of state who were available, since the Ruskin College speech by Prime Minister Jim Callaghan in October 1976, which launched what was described as the ‘Great Debate’ about education and the schooling system. We chose 1976 as the starting point for our story because it punctuates the period from 1945 to the present day. Before 1976 was an age which might be dubbed one of optimism and trust (probably misplaced), and afterwards one of markets, centralisation and managerialism, while the speech itself was given during a period of doubt and disillusion when the developments in schooling set up at the end of the Second World War were called into question.
We have focused on what we might learn from this second period – as well as acknowledging what the early phase taught us – because we feel that the time is ripe. We also want to take the best of ‘what is’ and speculate about ‘what might be’ to improve on our ‘previous best’ – always the quest of successful teachers, whether in respect of their own practice or that of their pupils. In short, it is time to move towards a new age, just as happened in the 1970s as we transitioned from optimism and trust to markets, centralisation and managerialism.
Despite its undoubted successes, there are similar doubts gathering now about the effectiveness of this present age in meeting present and future needs in what is a world of accelerating change. That change comes in many forms – social, technological and natural – and it will be confronted and solved or harnessed by the present and future generations of educated citizens. Our schools and schooling system need to be sure they are preparing all our present and future pupils to live confidently as fulfilled citizens in a world affected by climate change, the global shift of populations, the application of artificial intelligence and robotics refined by nanotechnology, as well as the changes ushered in by the creation and expansion of the World Wide Web, meaning that use of the internet and its associated technologies will have profound implications for curriculum, pedagogy and assessment and how to handle the revolution in human communications. All our practitioner witnesses were profoundly 6worried about the impact of social media on children, adolescents and parents.
We will therefore explore the elements external to the school which influence how successful teachers and schools can be in raising the competence, learning and horizons of all their students, whatever their talents, challenges, advantages or problems. In doing so, we try to be led by the evidence, although we are aware of the pitfalls of ‘evidence-based policy’, even though it is now a phrase widely used by decision-makers at all levels of the schooling system.
What should we expect schools to be achieving, and what are the values that underpin those purposes?
Hovering in the background, however, is another powerful influence on policy-makers and those in leadership positions – namely, the values and beliefs we all hold, together with what we think the aims of schools and the schooling system should be. Let us therefore be explicit: if we had to create agreed aims for our schooling system, which surprisingly are not set out for England or the United Kingdom as a whole, we might start with the list below.
We want our children to understand through their schooling that:
Our experience tells us that there would be a broad consensus of agreement about these purposes. Some might wish to question specific wording or terminology, to add or amend, but what we want from our school system will be largely acceptable albeit with different emphases. It is when we come to values that the tensions seem to arise. Some of our values are implicit in this list but not all. Some will be contested but it is important to be explicit, so here they are.