Understanding Employee Engagement
eBook - ePub

Understanding Employee Engagement

Theory, Research, and Practice

  1. 288 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Understanding Employee Engagement

Theory, Research, and Practice

About this book

Understanding Employee Engagement is a comprehensive source for the science and practice of employee engagement. This book provides a rigorous and objective review of scholarship and empirical research on engagement from around the world.

Grounded in theory and empirical research, this book debates the definitions of engagement, provides a thorough evaluation of empirical findings in the engagement field including a focus on international findings, and offers practice implications for organizations. The book is broad, with references and research across disciplines and countries, as well as new sections addressing current challenges, such as virtual engagement, engaging the aging workforce, and perspectives on diversity and inclusion. Employers can learn how to foster an engaged organization; practitioners can learn how to measure, identify, and implement evidence-based solutions to disengagement; and researchers can master the existing engagement literature and begin to study the many propositions and new models the author proposes throughout the book.

This book is an essential read for scholars, researchers, practitioners, and business leaders alike for understanding how to measure, identify, and implement evidence-based solutions to foster employee engagement.

Trusted by 375,005 students

Access to over 1.5 million titles for a fair monthly price.

Study more efficiently using our study tools.

Information

Publisher
Routledge
Year
2022
Print ISBN
9780367773878
9780367773885
Edition
2
eBook ISBN
9781000547580

1 THE STORY OF ENGAGEMENT

DOI: 10.4324/9781003171133-1
I don’t know how to describe it – I just feel alive. I feel energized, excited, stimulated, almost on edge, and yet I can focus as if nothing else exists. When I’m engaged, I feel connected and feel like I’m doing something that matters; I’m making a difference, even if in a small way. It’s a choice, really, to be that “into” my job – I wasn’t always this way and I’m not always 100% in this mode.
– Interview 45
Employee engagement, also referred to as job or work engagement, is a widely discussed topic in both practice and academe. Engagement is frequently described as a motivational state associated with several positive and desirable consequences for organizations, such as high levels of job performance and positive attitudes like job satisfaction. Employee engagement is about investing oneself at work, being authentic in the job, and delivering one’s work performance with passion, persistence, enthusiasm, and energy. As I will review in Chapter 2, there are several different definitions for engagement at work; one of them, however, is not student engagement. Student engagement refers to a pattern of behaviors and emotions associated with students, in particular (Fredricks, Blumenfeld, & Paris, 2004). For example, students’ participation in class, affective reactions to their instructors and peers, level of effort in learning, and feeling of connection with peers and school are all part of the student engagement construct. In this book, when I refer to engagement, I am talking about employee engagement at work.
Make no mistake: employee engagement is a challenging concept to describe and study because there are many approaches to explaining what engagement at work is (see Chapter 2). Engagement seems to manifest itself in many ways across industries, defying initial attempts to box it into a single and simple definition. Thus, despite the recent explosion in research articles and books offering definitions of engagement, many authors still refer to engagement in terms of what it looks like (e.g., high performance) as opposed to what it is.
Most of the reasons shared in practice about why you should care about engagement continue to revolve around disengagement. In the early 2000s, the Gallup Organization (2002, 2013a, 2013b) reported upward of $355 billion lost annual revenue in the United States, all due to unengaged workers. In their 2017 report on the American workplace, Gallup (2017a) revised the loss to between $483 billion and $605 billion annually. Also in the 2000s, they reported that 87% of employees across 142 countries were disengaged. In 2017, using data they collected across 155 countries between 2014 and 2016, Gallup (2017b) revised their previous report and stated that 85% of employees were disengaged, of which about 18% were actively disengaged (described as resentful and undermining work efforts; p. 23). The costs of disengaged employees are not unique to the United States. Disengaged workers reportedly cost the British economy between £37.2 billion and £38.9 billion per year (roughly $58.8 to $61.5 billion; Flade, 2003). Kenexa Research Institute reported in 2009 that an analysis of 64 organizations revealed engaged employees were responsible for twice the annual net income of their unengaged contemporaries. On one of SHRM’s (Society for Human Resource Management’s) web pages, they note that Molson Coors reported unengaged employees suffered more safety and lost-time incidents than did engaged employees in just 1 year, adding up to about $1.7 million for the company that year (see SHRM, n.d.). According to these combined reports (and many others I did not cite here), having disengaged employees results in enormous financial losses, which is the key reason why you should care about engagement.1 There are exceptions to the disengagement reason for caring about engagement. For instance, the Dale Carnegie Organization (2007) suggested managers should care about engagement because engaged employees are productive, and high-engagement workplaces attract people who want to work hard for the organization. Glassdoor says they care about engagement because engaged employees drive business success (Clark, 2018).
1 These reports provide few, if any, details on how the studies were conducted, including essential information about the samples and how engagement versus disengagement was operationalized.
If you look for a reason beyond disengagement to propel you into caring about employee engagement, you might consider peer pressure: everyone seems to be focusing on engagement; therefore, it must be important, right? Simple searches on the Internet, online bookstores, and electronic research databases reveal thousands of hits on employee/job/work engagement. Of the engagement books available on the market today, nearly all are targeted at the practitioner, human resource (HR) manager, and/or business leader explaining how to get engagement and the presumed consequence of high job performance. Even though few, if any, of these books incorporate research evidence to support their claims,2 the sheer number of books suggests organizational leaders, consultants, and HR managers are running full steam ahead pursuing the idea of employee engagement.
2 For an exception among the many books offering fast tips for boosting engagement scores, see John P. Meyer and Benjamin Schneider’s edited book, A Research Agenda for Employee Engagement in a Changing World of Work, in which authors provide research-informed perspectives on engagement.
Reasons other than fear of disengagement or recent fads to get you focused on employee engagement include the results of research catching up with practice. Some scholars have suggested researchers are attempting to legitimize engagement, an “intuitive construct” (Newman & Harrison, 2008), which requires significant theory, debate, and empirical studies for clarifying its uniqueness and validity in causing the effects heavily marketed by human resources and consulting firms (Macey & Schneider, 2008). This explanation may be true, but regardless of the reasons for the explosive scholarly interest in the topic, findings across many studies examining the relationship between engagement and performance, job satisfaction, and commitment, for example, indicate engagement uniquely contributes to explaining and predicting important organizational behavior (e.g., performance, innovation).
Another key reason to care about employee engagement is its relationship to employee health: engaged employees report positive physical and mental health outcomes and well-being, and the scientific literature strongly supports these relationships. A substantial number of studies report negative relationships between engagement and burnout, stress, and psychosomatic illness (Halbesleben, 2010). The negative relationship means that as employees report higher levels of engagement, they report lower levels of burnout, stress, and/or psychosomatic illness. Since health care spending accounts for nearly 20% of the U.S. gross domestic product (see the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website), focusing on increasing engagement could translate into fewer dollars spent on employee health programs or lost days of work (e.g., sick leave).
Business reasons less tied to financial gains or losses for caring about engagement include framing engagement as a component of corporate social responsibility, which refers to the idea that companies integrate social and environmental concerns, making these concerns a joint corporate priority. For example, corporate social responsibility efforts include re-establishing the trust of the public in the ethical practices and intentions of the organization. By connecting corporate social responsibility to the well-being and general welfare of employees (through fostering their engagement levels at work), organizations may be able to send the message they care about profits and, importantly, not at the expense of their employees’ health (physical and psychological).
While many reasons exist to care about employees’ engagement levels, scholars remain challenged in defining the construct and agreeing on a single definition. Engagement seems to manifest itself in many different ways across people, jobs, and industries, calling into question whether a single definition can suffice. The following are a few illustrative excerpts taken from actual interviews targeted toward understanding what employee engagement is and what it looks/feels like to employees. I changed names and personal information of the interviewees to protect their confidentiality.
DeWayne is a 40-year-old associate professor in the social sciences at a mid-sized university on the East Coast of the United States. His answers to questions about how he felt about work initially indicated he was feeling burned out. One of the dominant approaches to employee engagement started with the assumption engagement is the opposite of burnout – if you feel burned out, you cannot also be engaged. However, DeWayne tells a different story:
Well, a few years ago, I would say I was getting burned out at work. I hated going to staff meetings and when there, I would just crawl into a corner and focus on my own thoughts and notes. I avoided people by working from home as much as I could – just so I didn’t have to be in that environment. So much backstabbing and so little accountability [he looks disgusted]. They expect a ton of you and never recognize how much you do. I felt so different, so energized when I could work at home for a couple of days in a row. Just being away from my coworkers – don’t get me wrong, I’m sure they are good at what they do. I just don’t really like them all that much. They do nothing to make me feel supported [paused for a while as if collecting thoughts]. I really like what I do – I feel so intellectually stimulated, writing, and problem-solving in my research. It’s a challenge to me to figure out how to convey our field in simple terms to the students, so that they can see how exciting the material is and… well, I like to find ways to make it come alive [paused for a moment]. My wife complains that I work too much – I get lost in what I’m doing, ya’ know, lose track of time and then I’m late for dinner, finding excuses for why I couldn’t tear myself away from my research. I just really like what I do – it invigorates me.
Becky’s story conveys how important the people at work are to her and the value of relationships in promoting her engagement at work. Becky is a 55-year-old mental health care worker at a nonprofit organization in the midwestern United States.
When I started, the organization was a tiny version of its current self, and so in those days people were much less specialized and did a lot of different things; had a lot of different roles. We had more variety [she paused for a few moments]. Things have gotten much more bureaucratic. There were fewer levels to go through for decisions, we had easier access up the ladder, power used to be delegated downward more, we had more say in decision-making. It doesn’t feel like the camaraderie is happening [she started crying]. Relationships are different now and it used to be easier to talk through things – now it’s all e-mail; so distant between people, even with people sitting a desk away.
[I ask her] So why are you still here, what keeps you going?
I love my job. I love the clients. What I do matters in their lives – I’ve known some of them for years and when they come in, it’s like seeing a good friend. Having a long-term perspective helps me. I don’t always feel like everything is engaging for me, but I like the big picture and it helps me know that it’s valuable in the long run. I like what we do, I like our vision and I like what we provide. I think we do a really good job for our clients. There’s a lot of wonderful people here.
Petrus is a 46-year-old consultant in South Africa. He used to work for a large corporation, but when the government instituted new policies for selection and promotion in efforts to rectify many years of apartheid oppression, he left and started his own consulting firm. I asked him about his consulting work because he specializes in helping organizations with promoting engagement:
I really liked my work at [organization] – I was there for at least 20 years before I decided to leave. I don’t begrudge the organization for what it was doing – they had to follow the law. I do a number of different things now, which makes my work so interesting. I work with a variety of organizations all around South Africa – none are the same. I develop leadership training programs – I focus a lot on communication, conveying clear vision, and basic management principles. There’s such a large pay discrepancy here between the lowest level worker and the managers, a problem that I can’t solve. So we focus on developing employee appreciation programs, finding ways to match employees’ skills to the right jobs, and teaching them how to work together in teams. I use both surveys and focus groups to measure engagement – I wouldn’t say everything we do works every time, but for the most part, we make a difference.
Lastly, Valerray is a 30-year-old businessperson in Russia who responded to my questions about engagement in the following way (we conversed through translators):
I’m not sure I understand your question. Happiness? You want to know about happiness? Look at us, we’re very happy. We love to have fun [we discuss how happiness is not the same as engagement]. Involvement, engagement? [the translator offered that she thinks they are all the same word] I don’t know. The older workers are struggling with what it means to be independent – they grew up in a government where they knew their place at work and felt pride about doing something the government needed and wanted. The younger workers don’t know that system, so we experience work differently. We are challenged and excited about making our way in this new world. We are happy; we work hard; I work hard. We do as much as we can and feel good. We are passionate about what we do and find ways to make it good for the people – I have nice offices for my employees, give them time off when they need, have work they like to do, and we talk a lot about work. I send my employees to training programs; they like to learn and then they do better on the job.

Road Map for This Book

By Chapters

The first form of engagement proposed (i.e., Kahn, 1990) says employee engagement is about investing oneself, being authentic in the job, and delivering one’s work performance with passion, attention, persistence, and energy (Chapter 2 provides details on this definition). Engagement is generally characterized as a motivational state, positively associated with performance, which is different from organizational attitudes frequently mentioned, such as job satisfaction and commitment (Chapter 3 reviews differences and similarities between engagement and various similar constructs). Most organizational leaders believe they can promote employees’ engagement, not only by providing the right environment and good leadership (Chapter 4), but also by removing inhibitors (Chapter 5). Of course, fostering engagement also means being able to assess (measure) how often employees report being engaged and by how much (Chapter 6 reviews measures of engagement).
Given the benefits associated with employee engagement (I review many in the first few chapters), organizations seek to use engagement for competitive advantage (Chapter 7 discusses how to do so). Although one of the benefits associated with engagement is improved health for the employee, I introduce in Chapter 8 the possibility that engagement can improve the health of the organiza...

Table of contents

  1. Cover Page
  2. Endorsements Page
  3. Half Title Page
  4. Series Page
  5. Title Page
  6. Copyright Page
  7. Dedication Page
  8. Contents Page
  9. Series Foreword Page
  10. Acknowledgments Page
  11. Preface Page
  12. 1 The Story of Engagement
  13. Part I Engagement Under the Microscope
  14. Part II Securing an Engaged Workforce
  15. Part III Competitive Advantage
  16. Part IV The New Frontiers of Employee Engagement
  17. References
  18. Index

Frequently asked questions

Yes, you can cancel anytime from the Subscription tab in your account settings on the Perlego website. Your subscription will stay active until the end of your current billing period. Learn how to cancel your subscription
No, books cannot be downloaded as external files, such as PDFs, for use outside of Perlego. However, you can download books within the Perlego app for offline reading on mobile or tablet. Learn how to download books offline
Perlego offers two plans: Essential and Complete
  • Essential is ideal for learners and professionals who enjoy exploring a wide range of subjects. Access the Essential Library with 800,000+ trusted titles and best-sellers across business, personal growth, and the humanities. Includes unlimited reading time and Standard Read Aloud voice.
  • Complete: Perfect for advanced learners and researchers needing full, unrestricted access. Unlock 1.5M+ books across hundreds of subjects, including academic and specialized titles. The Complete Plan also includes advanced features like Premium Read Aloud and Research Assistant.
Both plans are available with monthly, semester, or annual billing cycles.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1.5 million books across 990+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn about our mission
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more about Read Aloud
Yes! You can use the Perlego app on both iOS and Android devices to read anytime, anywhere — even offline. Perfect for commutes or when you’re on the go.
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app
Yes, you can access Understanding Employee Engagement by Zinta S. Byrne in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Business & Human Resource Management. We have over 1.5 million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.