A World Without Cages
eBook - ePub

A World Without Cages

Bridging Immigration and Prison Justice

  1. 180 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

A World Without Cages

Bridging Immigration and Prison Justice

About this book

This book is the first collection to bring together scholars and activists working to end criminal and immigration detention. Employing an intersectional lens and an impressive variety of case studies, the book makes a compelling case to rethink what justice could mean for refugees, citizens, and everyone in between.

The book connects immigration detention and prison justice towards reimagining a newer, better future. The ten chapters probe the intersections of immigration detention with current and potential forms of citizenship, membership, belonging, and punishments. Deprivation of liberty is one of the most serious harms that someone can experience. Immigration control is a nation-building project where racial, gender, class, ableist, and other lines of discrimination filter and police access to permanent residence. Employing a kaleidoscope of interdisciplinary backgrounds, the contributors bring this focus to bear on case studies spanning North America, Europe, and Asia. In conversation with social movements challenging police brutality, the contributors are thinking through the implications of de-funding the police, overhauling the 'criminal justice' system, eradicating prisons (penal abolitionism), and ending all forms of containment (carceral abolitionism). Neither the prison nor the detention centre is an inevitable feature of our social lives. This book collectively argues that abolishing detention could pave the way for new visions of justice to emerge.

The chapters in this book were originally published as a special issue of Citizenship Studies.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, you can cancel anytime from the Subscription tab in your account settings on the Perlego website. Your subscription will stay active until the end of your current billing period. Learn how to cancel your subscription.
No, books cannot be downloaded as external files, such as PDFs, for use outside of Perlego. However, you can download books within the Perlego app for offline reading on mobile or tablet. Learn more here.
Perlego offers two plans: Essential and Complete
  • Essential is ideal for learners and professionals who enjoy exploring a wide range of subjects. Access the Essential Library with 800,000+ trusted titles and best-sellers across business, personal growth, and the humanities. Includes unlimited reading time and Standard Read Aloud voice.
  • Complete: Perfect for advanced learners and researchers needing full, unrestricted access. Unlock 1.4M+ books across hundreds of subjects, including academic and specialized titles. The Complete Plan also includes advanced features like Premium Read Aloud and Research Assistant.
Both plans are available with monthly, semester, or annual billing cycles.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes! You can use the Perlego app on both iOS or Android devices to read anytime, anywhere — even offline. Perfect for commutes or when you’re on the go.
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app.
Yes, you can access A World Without Cages by Sharry Aiken,Stephanie J. Silverman in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Politics & International Relations & Politics. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Mutual aid as abolitionist praxis

Simone Weil Davis and Rachel Fayter
ABSTRACT
Prisons, jails, and detention facilities, by definition, are designed to isolate and separate people from their communities. To challenge and upend carcerality requires not just dismantlement, but radical revisioning, a building – of flourishing, free and caring communities. Collectively developed responses and resources for people and ecosystems, led by those with lived experience of oppression, are the foundation for a world without prisons.
Prisons, jails, and detention facilities, by definition, are designed to isolate and separate people from their communities. With increasing rates of incarceration and migrant detention, especially among women and racialized communities (Roberts 2017; United Nations (UN) General Assembly 2010; Zinger 2019), large numbers of people are being torn from their families, forced to leave their life and everything they know behind. People in prison or on parole, the undocumented, and those in immigrant detention share experiences of dislocation, disenfranchisement, racism, violence and dehumanization. Often, they are confined in the same facility. In this bluntest of ways, the ‘problems’ of prison and of immigrant detention converge.
But it may be prison abolitionist ‘solutions’ that matter most in this convergence. To challenge and upend carcerality requires not just dismantlement, but radical revisioning, a building – of flourishing, free and caring communities (Davis 2003). Collectively developed responses and resources for people and ecosystems, led by those with lived experience of oppression, are the foundation for a world without prisons.
Mutual aid makes it possible both to survive the present – solidarity as resistance – and to imagine and build ‘decarceral futures’ (Aiken and Silverman 2019; Spade 2020; Kaba and Spade 2020). Particularly when seeking help from state and official sources is a dead end and an active harm, people organize to help each other. Perhaps there is no refugee camp, no migrant community, no institution of confinement, no group of survivors, no low-income neighborhood where people of color live, where that isn’t the case.
In prisons and migrant detention facilities, mutual aid is a way of life and survival. Extensive research has shown that mutual aid or peer-support is very beneficial for criminalized people (Maruna and LeBel 2003; Pollack 2008; Sheehan, McIvor, and Trotter 2011), yet the oppressive carceral system typically does not support it. In carceral settings, relationships are highly structured and controlled (Pollack 2007), while solidarity and even friendship among prisoners is repressed (Anonymous Prisoner 4 2017; Fayter and Payne 2017; Law 2012; McCorkel 2003). Despite this, many people with lived experience of incarceration advocate for and support other prisoners and criminalized people, organizing resistance to the carceral state. Abolitionist praxis requires a politics built around this type of solidarity in action.
As a former prisoner who spent almost four years in prison, I (co-author Rachel Fayter) can personally attest to the importance of mutual aid. When I first arrived at a new institution, I relied on those who were there before me to learn the rules and how to navigate the system. I also quickly learned that fighting for my rights would result in being targeted by staff. In federal custody there were technically several prisoner employment positions focused on mutual-aid, such as inmate committee, grievance coordinator, and peer-support. These jobs were considered ‘positions of trust’ within the institution, which effectively meant that anyone who had a misconduct was not allowed to work. Some of these positions remained unfilled for years at a time, but informal mutual aid is persistent; when the sanctioned opportunities were not available prisoner support moved underground.
Engaging in ‘everyday acts of resistance’ (Scott 1985, 1990) prisoners often made care packages for new arrivals, with hygiene products, coffee, and stamps. We cooked for one another, lent clothing to someone who had a visit, and shared a book or music album. These acts of kindness were prohibited by the system and anyone who participated risked misconduct charges, which reduces one’s chance for parole. Despite the risk, we strive to live in solidarity.
Resistance and solidarity coincide in mutual aid (Medina 2013). This convergence drove our own opening workshop at the 2019 Decarceral Futures conference. Walls to Bridges courses bring together incarcerated and non-incarcerated students as classmates (wallstobridges.ca). W2B learning circles are founded on the idea that we need each other’s shared knowledges and our incommensurabilities (Gaztambide-Fernández 2012). Examining the hierarchical and oppressive power relations that structure institutions of punishment as well as education, students forge, test, challenge and strengthen other ways of relating. To teach, learn and unlearn together: education as mutual aid.
Since the militarization of the US-Mexico border, Covid and the 2020 uprising against anti-Black racism, both existing and emergent networks of mutual aid are becoming more intentional, being coordinated into larger networks of care, refined and guided by those from marginalized communities.
‘Caremongering’ is a human trait; it is also an abolitionist building block (Chopra 2020). It is a collective deepening of webs of relationship that are neither defined nor ‘managed’ by carceral or capitalist structures. Perhaps these long-established relational structures, coordinated networks of collective care, provide the grounds for an alternative conceptualization of ‘citizenship’ (Abu El-Haj 2009), one based not on papers or the nation-state, but on situated engagement in mutual aid.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • Abu El-Haj, T. R. A. 2009. “Becoming Citizens in an Era of Globalization and Transnational Migration: Re-imagining Citizenship as Critical Practice.” Theory into Practice 48 (4): 274–282.
  • Aiken, S., and S. J. Silverman. 2019. “Introduction to DeCarceral Futures.” DeCarceral Futures Conference Presentation. Kingston, Ontario: Queens University Faculty of Law.
  • Anonymous Prisoner 4. 2017. “Dispatches from Federally Sentenced Women: Fraser Valley Institution.” Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 26 (1&2): 49–54.
  • Chopra, G. 2020. “‘Read First’ Post.” Caremongering-TO. www.facebook.com/groups/TO.Community.Response.COVID19/permalink/2661130287455762/
  • Davis, A. Y. 2003. “Abolitionist Alternatives.” In Are Prisons Obsolete?, edited by Greg Ruggiero, 105–115. NY: Seven Stories Press.
  • Fayter, R., and S. Payne. 2017. “The Impact of the Conservative Punishment Agenda on Federally Sentenced Women and Priorities for Social Change.” Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 26 (1&2): 10–30.
  • Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A. 2012. “Decolonization and the Pedagogy of Solidarity.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society 1 (1): 41–67.
  • Kaba, M., and D. Spade. 2020. “Interviewees: ‘Solidarity Not Charity’: Mutual Aid and How to Organize in the Age of Coronavirus,” Democracy Now! Accessed 21 March 2020. www.democracynow.org/2020/3/20/coronavirus_community_response_mutual_aid
  • Law, V. 2012. Resistance behind Bars: The Struggles of Incarcerated Women. 2nd ed. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
  • Maruna, S., and T. LeBel. 2003. “Welcome Home? Examining the ‘Re-entry Court’ Concept from a Strengths-based Perspective.” Western Criminology Review 4: 91–107.
  • McCorkel, J. A. 2003. “Embodied Surveillance and the Gendering of Punishment.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32 (1): 41–76. doi:10.1177/0891241602238938.
  • Medina, J. 2013. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pollack, S. 2007. “’I’m Just Not Good in Relationships:’ Victimization Discourses and the Gendered Regulation of Criminalized Women.” Feminist Criminology 2: 158–174. doi:10.1177/1557085106297521.
  • Pollack, S. 2008. Locked In, Locked Out: Imprisoning Women in the Shrinking and Punitive Welfare State. Ottawa, ON: Faculty of Social Work, Wilfrid Laurier University. Accessed 15 June 2020. https://www.academia.edu/6375218/Locked_In_Locked_Out_Imprisoning_Women_in_the_Shrinking_and_Punitive_Welfare_State
  • Roberts, A. 2017. Gendered States of Punishment and Welfare: Feminist Political Economy, Primitive Accumulation and the Law. New York: Routledge.
  • Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Scott, J. C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Sheehan, R., G. McIvor, and C. Trotter. 2011. “Who Cares? Fostering Networks and Relationships in Prison and Beyond.” In Working with Women Offenders in the Community, edited by Sheehan, R., G. McIvor, and C. Trotter, 268–287. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
  • Spade, D. 2020. “The Big Door Brigade.” website. Accessed 6 June 2020. www.bigdoorbrigade.com
  • United Nation...

Table of contents

  1. Cover
  2. Half Title Page
  3. Title Page
  4. Copyright Page
  5. Table of Contents
  6. Citation Information
  7. Notes on Contributors
  8. Introduction – decarceral futures: bridging immigration and prison justice towards an abolitionist future
  9. 1 Mutual aid as abolitionist praxis
  10. 2 States and human immobilization: bridging the conceptual separation of slavery, immigration controls, and mass incarceration
  11. 3 Crisis, capital accumulation, and the ‘Crimmigration’ fix in the aftermath of the global slump
  12. 4 Held at the gates of Europe: barriers to abolishing immigration detention in Turkey
  13. 5 Substituting immigration detention centres with ‘open prisons’ in Indonesia: alternatives to detention as the continuum of unfreedom
  14. 6 ICE comes to Tennessee: violence work and abolition in the Appalachian South
  15. 7 Migrant justice as reproductive justice: birthright citizenship and the politics of immigration detention for pregnant women in Canada
  16. 8 Immigration status and policing in Canada: current problems, activist strategies and abolitionist visions
  17. 9 Curated hostilities and the story of Abdoul Abdi: relational securitization in the settler colonial racial state
  18. Index