1
Historical and Political Developments in Afghanistan: Impact on the Indian Subcontinent
The areas which now comprise Afghanistan were always at the crossroads⌠it was both a gateway to foreign armies as well as a source of invasions.
â Rasul Bakhsh Rais1
Afghanistan, which literally means âLand of the Afghans,â2 originally denoted the areas where the Pashtuns3 had settled, and the terms âAfghanâ was initially used for the Pashtun tribes.4 For many centuries, Afghans were referred to âas Avagana and A-po-Kien from which the term âAfghanistanâ seems to have been derived,â wrote Mohammad Amin Wakman, Honorary Chairman and Director of International Affairs of the Afghan Mellat Party.5 He added that with the subsequent spread of Pashtuns in other regions, âthe term âAfghanistanâ gradually signified a larger territory that eventually included Khurasan of the Islamic era and Ariana [also known as Bactria] of ancient times.â6 Since, the term âAfghanâ originally referred only to a particular ethnic group, the Pashtuns, the Afghans were called by different names by different people. H.W. Bellew, a British political officer at Kabul, wrote that the Mohammadans of Asia Minor and the Western countries called the Afghans âSulemani,â whereas the people of India and the East generally knew the Afghans by the name âPashtun.â He further added that the Afghan âis also called Rohilla,â but, pointed out that âthis name is properly applicable only to the true [Pashtun], the native of Roh (the Highlands), the true Highlander.â7
Emergence of the Afghan State
The historical record indicates that Afghanistan until the 18th century was ânot a homogenous national state, [but] a conglomeration of tribes and ethnic groupsâ ruled by various foreign empires, local Emirs, and Kings.8 For instance, the Greeks ruled âBactriaâ (ancient name of Afghanistan) around 200 BC, which was followed by the Shakas also known as the Scythians, the Parthians and the Kushans.9 In 652 AD,, the Arabs invaded Afghanistan and introduced Islam. Subsequent other invaders included Genghis Khan (1219), Sabuk-tagin (10th century), Timurlang (14th century), and Babur (1504).10 Describing the pitiable political condition of Afghanistan, Col Algernon Durand, who was the British Agent in Gilgit from 1889-94, wrote, âThe armies of Alexander, the hordes of Gengis Khan and Timur go glittering by; dynasties and civilizations rise and fall like the waves of the sea; peace and prosperity again and again go down under the iron hoof of the conqueror; for centuries past, death and decay have ruled in the silent heart of Asia.â11 Sadhan Mukherjee too opined, âInvader after invader ravaged Afghanistan, drowning it in blood and gore. Some invaders left only a bloody imprint; some integrated themselves totally with the indigenous population, while still others came as birds of passage.â12
For centuries, the Afghans were suppressed and subjugated by external powers as the latter fought for supremacy and influence in the region. In the course of their struggle for influence and power domination, the external powers âencompassed the whole or great part of modern Afghanistan in conjunction with the whole or part of one or more of her present neighbours in Central and South Asiaâ into their kingdom.13 For example, in the 16th century, Afghanistanâs territory was not under a single administration, but was divided among three powerful empires. âThe Indian-based Moghal Empire ruled over Kabul and eastern Afghanistan. Northern Afghanistan (Maimana, Mazar-e-Sharif, and Kunduz) was part of a Central Asian polity ruled by Uzbek Emirs. Western Afghanistan was an integral part of Iran [Khurasan] that put Herat under the control of the Safavid Empire. Southern Afghanistan was first a Moghal territory that later came under the control of Iran after the Safavids conquered Kandahar.â14
However, the political conditions of Afghanistan underwent tremendous change after the death of the Persian King Nadir Shah (1747). Following the death of Nadir Shah, Ahmad Shah of the Abdali clan (tribe) was chosen as his successor in a Loya Jirga (Grand Assembly) of tribal chiefs in Kandahar in 1747. Ahmad Shah, on becoming the chief of the Afghans, âstyled himself Durr-i-Durran, âthe Pearl of the Age,â and his clan was henceforth known as the Durrani.â15 This event could be considered as a turning point in the history of Afghanistan, because Ahmad Shah Durrani then enlisted the support of the local tribes and founded the âKingdom of Afghanistan.â16 Subsequently, he embarked on a series of military campaigns and expanded his empire by conquering the neighbouring regions like Punjab, Kashmir, Sind, Sirhind, Baluchistan, Khurasan, Balkh, and several other regions bordering the southern bank of the Amu Darya (Oxus) river, and ruled Afghanistan until his death (1773).17 Timur Shah, son of Ahmad Shah Durrani, succeeded to the throne and ruled the country from 1773 to 1793. Unlike his father Ahmad Shah Durrani, Timur Shah was a âweak and indolentâ ruler, therefore, he âcould not pursue the vigorous policy of his predecessor.â18 He subsequently shifted his capital from Kandahar to Kabul. According to Ralph H. Magnus and Eden Naby, Timur Shah âmoved his capital from Kandahar to Kabul in order to weaken the power of other Durrani sardars (princes) [and] also to be closer to the Punjab, his richest province.â19 Ahmad Shayeq Qassem wrote that during the reign of Timur Shah, âdespite an increased tendency by the centrifugal forces of tribal leaders and some provincial governors to break away from the central government, the Durrani Empire remained intact.â20 However, the Durrani Empire began to crumble during the reign of Zaman Shah, Timurâs (fifth) son and successor, who ruled Afghanistan from 1793 to 1800.
Having ascended the throne of Kabul, an ambitious Zaman Shah advanced to Lahore in 1798 with the cherished âdream of invading the interior of Hindustanâ like his predecessors. But he was compelled to return to Peshawar from Lahore without fulfilling his ultimate dreams of reaching Hindustan, because of the dispute with Persia (present Iran) over the province of Khurasan.21According to Historians R. C. Majumdar and others, the British India Empire was âkept in a chronic state of unrestâ at the prospects of Zaman Shah invading India, so, to thwart the growing power of Zaman Shah, the British sent âtwo missions in 1799 to Persia, whose relations with Afghanistan were then strained.â The British design proved successful. Zaman Shah was eventually âoverthrown and blindedâ and was forced to flee to Bukhara, then to Herat and finally to India (Ludhiana), because of âthe interplay of dynastic rivalries over a royal successor.â The mighty Durrani Empire disintegrated with the ouster of Zaman Shah from power, as his brother and successor Mahmud Shah was weak and could not keep the kingdom intact. 22
Colonisation of Afghanistan
Since the middle of the 18th century, the confrontation between the European powers for territory expansion in Central and Southern Asia began to take place. In the light of this development, by the early 19th century, Russia began to manoeuvre its foreign policy towards the Central and Southern Asian regions. In 1809, Napoleon and Russian Czar Alexander 1 signed the Treaty of Tilsit with the aim to plan for a combined invasion of India.23 Four years later, in 1813, Russia and Persia concluded the Treaty of Gullistan, as Russia was eager to expand its territory in the East.24 A recent publication of the Russian General Staff has indicated that Russia diverted its interest towards the Central and Southern Asia regions due to the âdesire to abolish the slave trade and to establish [law and] order and control along the southern border.â25 Whatever the reason, the British viewed Russian expansion in the region as a threat to India which held an important place in the âCrown of the British Empire.â Therefore, the British took various measures, politically and commercially, to expand their sphere of influence into the Central Asian region primarily âto find a sound âscientificâ defensive frontier for India,â not forgetting the commercial interest. One such approach was that, in 1809, the first British mission under Mountstuart Elphinstone came to Afghanistan and signed a Friendship Treaty with the Afghan Amir, Shah Shuja, at Peshawar.26 Two and half decades later, in 1836, the British alarmed by the Amir of Afghanistan leaning towards Russia, sent (another mission) Alexander Burnes, a distinguished British officer, to Kabul âunder the pretext of a commercial mission.â But, according to Majumdar and others, Burneâs secret mission to Kabul was to study the working of the political affairs of Afghanistan and âjudge what was to be done hereafter.â27 Having met the Amir of Afghanistan Dost Muhammad, Burnes was convinced that the latter was willing âto accept British overtures, provided the British government agreed to put pressure on Ranjit Singh to restore Peshawar to him.â28 Burnes, therefore, recommended that the British ally with the Amir of Afghanistan. However, Lord Auckland and his two Secretaries rejected Burnesâ suggestion of the need to develop an alliance with the Amir of Afghanistan, because doing so would mean âopposing their Sikhs allies.â29 The indifferent attitude of the British government toward the Amir of Afghanistan consequently led the Amir to strengthen his countryâs relations with Russia...