IKEA, the Swedish-based home furnishing company with more than 375 stores in 30 countries and annual revenue of more than $45 billion in 2019, has a simple vision statement.
âOur mission as a business is âto offer a wide range of well-designed, functional home furnishing products at prices so low that as many people as possible will be able to afford them.â Our vision also goes beyond home furnishing. We want to create a better everyday for all people impacted by our business.â1
The companyâs strategy is to offer exceptionally low prices that other providers cannot match or sustain, making IKEAâs products more affordable to more customers. At the same time, the company promises a smaller sacrifice in the aesthetics of its less costly products, stressing that the products will be well designed and the company will not be stigmatized as a cut-rate brand. And in creating âa better everyday life for the many people,â IKEA included its own employees, not just customers, by paying workers above-market wages.2
A first step toward integrating strategy and leadership is to understand the basic dynamics of an organizationâs current strategy. This necessitates applying an active ear to the market and having the ability to translate disparate sources, weak signals, and nascent trends into a vision of where to take an enterprise. And this must be done recurrently, since no single moment of insight can serve as an enduring platform. It requires an ability to read the pastâs implications for future decisions and to learn from prior experiences which actions will better serve the enterprise in the future. It also depends on a managerâs capacity to communicate that intent persuasively and indelibly.3
Setting company strategy, in the way IKEA has, requires leaders to devote time and thought to five sets of questions, summarized in box 1.1.
Vision and Competitive Positioning
A companyâs vision shapes the competitive positioning of its products and services. To enact the vision, managers require an appreciation for the drivers of both differentiation and cost to define and sustain that positioning. This can be challenging since industries vary greatly in the degree of product differentiation and cost, which affects customer willingness to pay.
IKEA managers, for instance, achieved a sophisticated combination of differentiation and cost by offering simple, versatile products with smart designs at a very low price point. By focusing on clean lines in furniture design and easy-to-assemble kits, its managers were able to provide customers with aesthetically pleasing products at an attractive price and, in doing so, build an enduring competitive position in the home furnishing market.
Or consider the competitive positioning and product differentiation of Procter & Gamble Co. (P&G), a consumer goods firm with $75 billion in revenue in 2020 and more than 99,000 employees. Former chief executive A. G. Lafley, who led the company from 2000 to 2010 and again from 2013 to 2015, set forward the firmâs vision: âWe will provide products and services of superior quality and value that improve the lives of the worldâs consumers. As a result, consumers will reward us with leadership sales, profit, and value creation, allowing our people, our shareholders, and the communities we live and work in, to prosper.â4
Box 1.1. Setting Company Strategy
1. Vision. Do you have an inspirational statement of purpose and direction for the organization? What is your winning aspiration? How does this drive your organizationâs goals, sense of purpose, and approach to competition and achievement of ambition?
2. Competitive positioning. How is the firm positioned in its markets? The time-proven concepts of competitive strategy are of primary concern, including the influence of suppliers, the likelihood of new entrants, the threat of substitutes, and the firmâs position in its collaborative networks.
3. Value proposition. What features of a companyâs product or service line create valueâor destroy valueâand are subject to a managerâs discretion? What investments are needed to enhance product or service differentiation or improve efficiency?
4. Competitive advantage. Given the external and internal factors, what decisions by a manager can create additional advantage for the enterprise in the market? Expressed negatively, what bad decisions or cases of indecision can result in disadvantage?
5. Strategic redirection. In light of answers to the previous questions, is the enterprise due for a course correction?
While the statement may appear lofty or even contrived, it served as a pragmatic vision for focusing Lafley and employees on developing products that could âimprove the livesâ of consumers, though consumers might pay more for them. The number of well-known billion-dollar P&G brands that achieved thisâCrest, Duracell, Gillette, Olay, Pampers, and Tide among themâmore than doubled during Lafleyâs tenure at P&G, and he built a fivefold increase in the number of less established brands with sales of $500 million to $1 billion.5
Some industries, such as fashion, pharmaceuticals, and smartphones, present opportunities for high product differentiation, whereas other industries have less of an opportunity. When product differentiation is low, companies tend to focus on greater efficiency and lower costs compared with competitors. One example: the discount retail industry, where a primary driver of a firmâs competitive advantage is its low prices, made possible by intensive effort within the firm to cut costs as much as possible. Walmart has long dominated this industry with its exceptionally low expenses in its supply chain, using real-time inventory and logistic systems to reduce stockpile costs and the expense of selling in its stores. Its managers deliberately set forward a long-term, low-cost model built on a superior supply chain and global manufacturing system. Other players in the online retail market have optimized a combination of differentiation and efficiency, delivering products exceptionally quickly and inexpensively.
In industries with greater potential for product differentiation, brand can prove a potent driver. Customers are willing to pay more for beverages made by the Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, for example, than for those made by lesser-known companies, even when taste tests reveal little real disparity among them. Similarly, customers are prepared to spend more on fragrances from the EstĂ©e Lauder Companies and LâOrĂ©al S.A. than those from less prestigious makers, and clients are willing to spend more on consulting firms with premier reputations, such as McKinsey & Company, and well-known investment banks, such as Goldman Sachs.
Technology has become a differentiator as well. Lipitor, the cholesterol-reducing drug produced by Pfizer, earned more than $1.97 billion in revenue in 2019. Many physicians and patients continue to prefer Pfizerâs offering not only because its prescriptions do not require a special liver test but also because they are already familiar with the brand. Customer service is yet another example of a differentiator, as evident among exclusive hotels and luxury stores that charge customers a premium for their high-class ambiance.6
Most firms start with relatively similar inputs to create their products, but efficiencies in making them can vary considerably. From purchasing and manufacturing to marketing and distribution, reducing costs can help move a company toward a superior value frontier where the combination of product differentiation and production cost is optimal given the enterprise and its market. For optimizing their competitive positioning, managers are called to focus on four features of their firmâs strategy, as outlined in box 1.2.
A superior value proposition is the combination of differentiated product features and costs that most appeals to customers. A managerâs ability to build a superior value proposition begins with learning to appreciate what drives a customerâs willingness to pay for a product or service. That readiness is linked to product differentiationâthe features of the product or service that enhance its desirability to the customer regardless of cost. The success of Apple Inc.âs iPhone, for instance, can be attributed in part to the distinctive combination of value, design, and functional features that increases customer willingness to pay a premium.7
Box 1.2. Features of Competitive Positioning
1. Product or service differentiation. Understand the drivers of customer willingness to pay and ways to strengthen that willingness.
2. Relative cost of production and delivery of the product or service. Appreciate the key elements of cost in the supply chain, production, logistics, and marketing.
3. Superior value proposition. Identify the frontier where the combination of product differentiation and cost relative to competitors is optimal for the industry or market.
4. Sustained value proposition. Recognize that product innovation and competitive dynamics result in ever-changing superior value frontiers defined by the current leadersâ combinations of product differentiation and relative cost.
The relative cost position for delivering products or services also enters into the makeup of a superior value proposition. The relative expense of producing Apple goodsâthe companyâs research and development, manufacturing and distribution, and branding and marketingâis high compared with the costs to produce rival products such as Microsoftâs tablet. Similarly, Appleâs cost of designing and marketing laptop computers far exceeds those of other competitors such as Lenovo and Dell. However, these higher costs result in products for which customers have a greater willingness to pay premium prices, more than offsetting the high relative cost position. However, firms with higher cost positions that do not have commensurate levels of differentiation end up at a competitive disadva...