![]()
Are there stories in the Bible that you really donāt like? Do you have a least favourite Bible story?
I knew my answer on this one immediately ā the Bible story in question is not so much disagreeable as downright horrifying. I hate it.
But then, I have a whole list of least favourite Bible stories. Sit tight ā thereās some nasty stuff coming.
It includes Abraham being told to take a knife and kill and burn his son Isaac. I can hardly stand to read it. Iām nauseated by Israel being commanded to create carnage as they took swords to the entire city of Jericho. Then thereās the episode of Paul being less than gracious with errant John Mark and refusing to allow him to continue on his apostolic team. While thereās not even a sniff of the violence that bleeds from the Abraham/Isaac and Jericho stories, this one makes me angry because Paul had received so much grace, what with him being the former chief persecutor of the Church and murderer of Christians (think ISIS with a fanatical Jewish face), and yet he seemed incapable of passing grace along and giving a young leader a second chance. Itās a decision that disgusts me and, more importantly, disgusted his teammate Barnabas ā their team split up that day and never reunited. Sad.
But my all-time least favourite episode is the vile story of Lot and his daughters. This awful incident includes incest and gang rape. Living in the moral cesspool that was Sodom, Lot is visited by some hunky angels. These celestial chaps are obviously rather handsome, because soon a group of men surround the house wanting to commit homosexual gang rape on them. If that isnāt nasty enough ā the picture of a mob of baying blokes crazed with violent lust is obscene ā Lotās response to them is unspeakably worse.
He offers them his virgin daughters. Iāll type that again, in case you missed the horror of it at first reading.
His bright idea was to throw his young, innocent daughters out to the wannabe rapists, and he even said that they could do whatever they liked with them.
What?
Commentators rush to talk about the cultural demands of hospitality ā since they had come under his roof, Lot was honour-bound to protect the angels, at whatever price. Lot was under huge pressure, but there is absolutely no excuse for his shameless willingness to sacrifice his own family in this way. He was living in Sodom, but clearly, Sodom had taken up residence in him. Thankfully, his offer was not taken up.
But thereās worse to come. This nasty, grubby, odious little man is mentioned in the New Testament, and when I read the description of him there, my mind revolts. Lot is described as ārighteousā.
Eh? A father who would surrender his own kith and kin to a hideous gang that would almost certainly not only have deflowered them, but killed them in the process?
But then that points to something remarkable about the gracious character of God.
Lot was righteous ā in comparison to the amoral, oppressive, abusive people he lived alongside.
Samson was a bloodthirsty, headstrong womaniser, but he still ends up in the hallowed list of faith heroes in Hebrews 11.
Abraham twice pretended that his wife Sarah was not his wife, which led to all kinds of confusion and trouble. But in the New Testament, he is tagged repeatedly as the friend of God.
It seems that God does not define us by our worst moments or our most shameful thoughts, which is an enormous relief, considering the depths to which we can all sink without too much effort.
And so I really donāt like the sickening story of Lot and his daughters at all. But when I look at Godās verdict on that wimpish, cowardly, tormented man, I find strange relief from a terrible tale.
To return to one of the other stories that I mentioned ā when God commanded Abraham to take a knife to Isaac ā Iāve been pondering it over the last few days, and I am definitely warming to it. And thatās because Iām thinking that itās actually an unfolding mini-drama about God showing Abraham what he didnāt want.
Let me explain. I know that, at the heart of this gut-wrenching episode, there is a test of faith and obedience. God wanted to know if Abraham was serious about doing what he was told. Even though, as I said earlier, the New Testament constantly celebrates Abe as a man of faith and the friend of God (and barely mentions his failures), the Old Testament makes it clear that Abrahamās walk of faith was a frankly unsteady amble with some major detours and lash-ups along the way. He struggled to live in the gap between Godās promise and its fulfilment, and I sympathise with him. He had to wait twenty-five years between being told that heād be the father of a nation and celebrating the birth of Isaac, who didnāt show up until Abraham was a hundred years old.
Along the way, he stumbled, agreeing to sleep with a servant girl to produce a child. That was a decision that brought about sixteen years of domestic tension and then a painful parting as he had to disinherit Ishmael. And then he lied about his wife Sarah being his wife, twice, which meant that she was taken by other men, again with bad results all round.
So now heās told to kill the boy he loves, the son and heir heās waited decades for. He has to juggle this totally contradictory command with something else God has said: the nations will be blessed through Isaac. So what on earth is going on?
And then, when you dig around in the Bible, itās clear that God always hated human sacrifice. He judged his people when they fell into doing it, and sobs through the prophet Jeremiah, āI did not command or mention [human sacrifice], nor did it enter my mind.ā2
2 Jeremiah 19:5
So whatās the deal? God repeatedly railed against the horrific practice of people sacrificing children in worship. But now he commands Abraham to do just that. Why?
Abraham came from Ur, where people sacrificed children. He was heading for Canaan, where the same terrible rituals were used. So now God needed Abraham to know, once and for all, this is not what I want, ever.
God could have just barked a command, a stern prohibition. But instead, he called Abraham to journey through the awful, conflicting agony of trekking up that mountain with his son and ultimately preparing him for death. Abraham now knew what excruciating emotional pain this hideous practice brought for both parent and child.
I think we need to talk a little more, not just about what God wants from us, but what he doesnāt want. Some of my angst as a teenage Christian came from my desperate determination to do the will of God, which created an unhealthy obsessiveness, edging towards fanaticism. I was willing and ready to take the knife (figuratively speaking) to some very beautiful things in my life, just because I loved them so much. One of them was Kay, now my wife of thirty-six years. I agonised over loving her, because I loved her, and nearly lost her as I struggled.
Abraham was discovering that God calls us to trust him, not appease him. Back then, I was living in appeasement mode, thinking that God would love me more if I discarded what I loved the most, bringing my sacrifices to him. And I frequently still slip back into appeasement-thinking, wanting to buy God, to pay him off. But his love is not for sale. In a way that you and I can never fully understand (especially in the light of what weāve just been thinking about), the price has been paid in full by Jesus.
Dennis Kinlaw preached a series of renewal services at a Wesleyan church here in Colorado, where I now live and work part of the time, back in 1982. He imagined God the Father and Jesus the Son watchi...