The development of doulas in the U.S.A.
The doula emerged in the U.S.A. between the 1980s and 1990s in response to the changes in the medical and social contexts of birth that had been occurring (Morton and Clift 2014). From the 1930s to the present, the U.S.A. experienced a succession of controversial processes: the hospitalization and medicalization of childbirth have over time been countered with the birth of movements aimed at promoting womenâs health, patientsâ rights, the demedicalization of labor and birth, and the use of non-conventional medicines. A number of patientsâ rights organizations were set up to develop advocacy activities aimed at satisfying womenâs wishes related to medical practices involving their bodies. According to Davis-Floyd (2022), from an earlier focus on ânatural childbirthâ and âalternative birth,â the adoption of a rights-based humanistic paradigm in the biomedicalâhospitalâtechnocratic context became the objective to be pursued (Davis-Floyd 2001, 2018; Earp et al. 2008).
In those same years, scientific evidence on the importance of the doulaâs role in childbirth was consolidated by the work of neonatologist Marshall Klaus and pediatrician John Kennell and their numerous studies (Klaus et al. 1986, 1993; Kennell et al. 1991). These two researchers, interested in investigating factors that inhibited or favored motherâchild bonding, discovered the figure of the doula described by Raphael (1973) and decided to adopt it as an explanation of the results that emerged from their earliest studies. The incident that marked their introduction of the term took place in a hospital in Guatemala, when a medical student who was collaborating with these researchers and their team never left women alone during labor. Her role should have been to stay true to the purpose of the studyâthe goal of which was to investigate factors that inhibited or favored motherâbaby bondingâbut she accidentally remained continuously next to every woman in labor to whom she was assigned for this research project. This was interpreted as a mistake and the ten mothers she had supported were excluded from the study. However, it was later decided to examine the data of the ten women previously excluded, and it emerged that their labors had been unusually short and without complications, and in three of them, there had been a very rapid production of colostrum after childbirth (Klaus et al. 1993). This fortuitous event inaugurated a series of studies carried out in different contexts, which confirmed that the continuous presence of a support figure, called a doula, reduced the number of caesarean sections by 50%, the duration of labor by 25%, the use of pitocin to augment labor by 40%, the use of analgesics by 30%, the use of forceps by 40%, and the demand for epidural analgesia by 60% (ibid.). These convincing results provided a solid scientific foundation for the introduction of the doula into the labor room, thereby helping to create an entirely new profession in the U.S.A.
The first doula trainings in the U.S.A. ran between 1979 and 1980 in The Birth Place, a freestanding birth center founded in 1979 in Menlo Park, California. The trainings, taught by various people with differing skills and perspectives that included the integration of mind, body, and spirit, and dealt with political issues and the history of birthing, were organized twice a year and were not well structured. In 1983, one of the trained doulas, Rahima Baldwin, decided to found an organization called the Association of Childbirth Assistants, which in the following year became the National Association of Childbirth Assistants (NACA). NACA later evolved into the still-extant ALACEâthe Association of Labor Assistants and Childbirth Educators.
During the 1980s, the doula profile began to spread in the country, to receive more attention among childbirth professionals, and to be the subject of publications. Since then, numerous doula organizations have been formed at local, national, and international levels. In 1992, the Doulas of North America (DONA) association was founded by neonatologist Marshall Klaus, pediatrician John Kennell, psychologist Phyllis Klaus (Marshallâs wife), perinatal educator Penny Simkin, and doula Annie Kennedy. The first goal of these founders was to create an umbrella association able to define the training paths to becoming a doula in order to homogenize and certify the doula training programs that by then were spreading across country with considerable variations. Despite the fact that numerous doula associations decided not to merge into DONA, the association grew considerably as the number of members increased, and the use of the term doula started to be implemented and nationally recognized, thanks to specific trainings and advertising events, and to the personal reputations of the founders, who were and are still widely admired in the US birth activist community, which considers them to be âiconsâ and âculture heroes,â both in life and in death (as Marshall and Phyllis Klaus and John Kennell are deceased). In 2004, having expanded its reach beyond the U.S.A., the association changed its name to DONA International. By September 2021, DONA International trained more than 12,000 doulas in 50 countries of the world and constitutes a reference point worldwide (www.dona.org).
Interestingly, an early controversy that arose between the founder of what later became ALACE, Rahima Baldwin, and the founders of DONA was whether or not doulas should be allowed to perform cervical checks to assess dilation at the laboring womanâs request, usually to help her decide when to head to the hospital. According to Robbie Davis-Floyd (personal communication, September 2021), Rahima Baldwin was adamant that this should be part of doulasâ skillset, while DONA was equally adamant that it should not. Since cervical checks carry dangers, such as infection, and are considered medical procedures that should only be performed by midwives or doctors, this controversy was ultimately resolved in favor of doulas not performing them. Thus, doulas learned many other methods of assessing labor progress, such as the sounds the mother makes, how she smells and acts, the kinds of breathing she does, and certain bodily changes. These skills matter most if the mother-to-be is laboring at home and needs to decide when to go to the hospital. Going too early, when she is still in latent labor, which can safely take hours or days to turn into active labor, can result in many interventions, a diagnosis of âfailure to progress,â and a cesarean birth. In the U.S.A., the doulaâs role has come to include going to the motherâs home when labor begins, and helping her to decide when itâs time to go to the hospitalâshould she be planning a hospital birth.
The development of doulas in Europe2
By the early 2000s, doulas had begun to proliferate in Europe, and new doula associations rapidly arose. In 2001, Doula UK was established in Great Britain, and in 2006, the association Doulas de France in France. In 2008, Doulas in Deutschland was born in Germany; in 2009, Eco-Mondo Doula3 in Italy4; and in 2010, AEDâAsociaciĂłn Española de Doulas in Spain.
In 2005, a few European doulas started to share the need and the vision to establish quality standards for doula training and practice; reflections and discussions continued during a conference in Graz, Austria (2006), and at several birth-related conferences, including Midwifery Today conference in Bad Wildbad, Germany (2006 and 2008), and at a conference in Paris, France (2007). With the goal of creating a network of support and information among the various doula training providers and associations in Europe, this group of European doulas undertook a six-year path. In 2006, the association Doulas de France set up a Yahoo site with the idea of generating a focal point where doulas could network and included in their ...