eBook - ePub
Washington Bullets
A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations
Vijay Prashad
This is a test
Share book
- 152 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Washington Bullets
A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations
Vijay Prashad
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
Washington Bullets is written in the best traditions of Marxist journalism and history-writing. It is a book of fluent and readable stories, full of detail about US imperialism, but never letting the minutiae obscure the larger political point. The book contains essays on acts of US imperialism, from the 1953 Iran coup to the 2019 ousting of Evo Morales in Bolivia. Despite all this, Washington Bullets is a book about possibilities, about hope, about genuine heroes. Washington Bullets is a book infused with this madness, the madness that dares to invent the future.
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Washington Bullets an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Washington Bullets by Vijay Prashad in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Politics & International Relations & Geopolitics. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
Part 1
DIVINE RIGHT
Divine right is an old, established principle. It means that kings have the right â ordained by God â to act in any way that they wish. Human-made laws are of no consequence beside the awesome power of God, and Godâs representative, namely the monarch.
In Delhi, towards the end of the 16th century, the Mughal Emperor Akbar began to have doubts about the idea of divine right. He established a translation bureau (maktab khana), where he asked intellectuals to read deeply into all religious traditions. âThe pillars of blind following were demolished,â wrote Akbarâs biographer Abuâl Fazl. âA new era of research and enquiry into religious matters commenced.â Part of the emergence of a non-religious idea of sovereignty was the sense that the Emperor had to rule for the people, not based on his own God-given right. âTyranny is unlawful in everyone, especially in a sovereign who is the guardian of the world,â wrote Abuâl Fazl in Ain-i-Akbari (1590).
Nine years later, the Spanish historian Juan de Mariana wrote De rege et regis institutione (1598), which made the case that the people â he meant mainly the nobles â âare able to call a king to accountâ.
Abuâl Fazl and de Mariana had sniffed the mood. Peasant rebellions had their impact. Their pitchforks were sharp; their anger a tidal wave.
Sovereignty gradually went from God and King to People.
A generation later, Louis XIV of France said â LâĂtat câest moi, the State is Me. His descendants would be guillotined.
PREPONDERANT POWER
On 6 August 1945, the United States military dropped a bomb that contained 64 kg of uranium-235 over the city of Hiroshima (Japan). The bomb took just over 44 seconds to fall from 9,400 metres and detonated 580 metres above the Shima Surgical Clinic. Over 80,000 people died instantly. This was the first use of the nuclear bomb.
Four days later, Satsuo Nakata brought the Domei New Agencyâs Leica camera to the city. He took 32 photographs of the devastation; each of these pictures â archived in the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum â is iconic. The force of the bomb flattened the city, even though less than two per cent of the uranium detonated. Nakata took a picture of the office of the newspaper Chugoku Shimbun and of the Odamasa kimono store. The storeâs metal twisted into a whirlwind. It is a sign of the power of this weapon. As Sankichi Toge, a hibakusha (survivor of the atom bomb) and poet, wrote of that power and its impact, as the fires burnt down from the bombâs power in a city of 350,000 : âthe only sound â the wings of flies buzzing around metal basinsâ.
Between 1944 and 1946, Paul Nitze had been the director and then Vice Chairman of the US governmentâs Strategic Bombing Survey. He began this work in Europe, but then went to Japan shortly after the war ended. Nitze later said that he had believed that the war would have been won âeven without the atomic bombâ. This is the thesis he hoped to prove during his time in Japan. The destruction he saw was breathtaking; it resembled the European cities that had faced conventional bombardment. As his biographer Strobe Talbott wrote, Nitze âbelieved that the measurements of the Survey at Hiroshima and Nagasaki showed the effects to be roughly the equivalent of an incendiary bombing raidâ. The Japanese generals and businessmen he interviewed told him that they would eventually have surrendered but that the atom bomb certainly made further war impossible. In November 1945, Nitze met Baron Hiranuma Kiichiro, the president of the Privy Council. On 26 July 1945, the United States, the United Kingdom, and China issued the Potsdam Declaration that called on Japan to surrender or else it would face âprompt and utter destructionâ. Kiichiro said he was moved by this threat to urge his fellow members of the Privy Council to surrender. He failed to carry the day. A week later, on 6 and 9 August, the US dropped the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japanâs Emperor Hirohito surrendered on 15 August. Kiichiro told Nitze that the âbiggest factorâ for the Japanese surrender was âthe atomic bombâ. The country, he said, âwas faced with terrible destructive powers and Japanâs ability to wage war was really at an endâ.
The immense authority of the atomic bomb had an impact on the Washington bureaucrats, even those who might have felt uneasy about its use. Nitze was one of them. He would have preferred that the atomic bomb not be used; but once used, saw its utility. It is why he would urge the US government to expand its massive arsenal. The point would not be to actually attack the USSR, but to ensure that the USSR was â as the US diplomat George F. Kennan said â contained, and then eventually rolled back. Nitze, more than Kennan, would shape US foreign policy for decades. With his team at the US State Department in 1952, Nitze formulated the clear objective of US power after the Second World War. The liberals in the US government, he said, tend to âunderestimate US capabilitiesâ; he did not, since he had seen it as part of the Strategic Bombing Survey. He introduced a word â preponderant â that would become part of the formula of US policy planners. âTo seek less than preponderant power would be to opt for defeat,â Nitzeâs staff wrote in 1952. âPreponderant power must be the objective of US policy.â
The word âpreponderantâ comes from Latin. It means âto weigh moreâ. The king is always worth his weight in gold. Now the United States claims the scale, its weight bolstered by the payloads dropped over Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
TRUSTEESHIP
Old colonial masters liked to think that they were directed by God to bring peace and civilization to the world. That idea of the colonizer as the peacemaker and the lawgiver shuffled into the grand discourses of modern international law. Natives were fractious, unable to be governed by reason; they needed their masters to help them, to be their trustees. The League of Nations Covenant (1919) assembled the lands of the natives into âtrusteeshipsâ, so that their masters could believe that their domination was sanctified by law. It was in Article 16 of the Covenant that the âpeace loving nationsâ â namely the imperialists â said that they had the âobligationâ to maintain peace and security.
European hypocrisy over terms like âpeaceâ was by then clear to the colonized world. The League of Nations Covenant was signed on 28 June 1919. A few months earlier, on 13 April 1919, British troops conducted a massacre in Jallianwala Bagh (Amritsar, India), where a mass meeting was being held in opposition to the authoritarian Defence of India Act of 1915. As many as a thousand people were killed on that one day. They were holding a peaceful meeting. The âpeace loving nationsâ murdered them. This was despite the fact that âIndiaâ was a member of the League. Well, as the Indian papers â such as Rajkaran (November 1919) â understood immediately, âEngland secured a vote for India on the League of Nations in order to be able to command a larger number of votes.â There was no benefit for India âin any wayâ.
The United States signed the Covenant. So did Nicaragua and Haiti. In 1909, the US had intervened in Nicaragua to overthrow President JosĂ© Santos Zelaya who had ambitions of creating a Federal Republic of Central America. Such a project of regional unity was unacceptable to the US, which wanted to carve out a canal through Nicaragua to unite the two oceans (when the US turned its attention to Panama, Zelaya asked the Germans if they would be interested in a canal; this was a fatal error for him). The departure of Zelaya opened up space in Nicaragua for nationalists, including in the military. When they rose up in the Mena Rebellion in 1912, the US marines returned â and remained until 1933.
Haiti, which, like Nicaragua, was in the League of Nations, saw its people rise up against the pro-US dictator Jean Vilbrun Guillaume Sam in 1915, whose death in the streets of Port-au-Prince gave the US the excuse to send in the marines; they remained in Haiti till 1934. Fifteen thousand to thirty thousand Haitians died in the repression, though this did not stop a peasant rebellion in 1919â20 and a series of strikes in 1929. The leader of part of this unrest â Charlemagne MassĂ©na PĂ©ralte (1886â1919) â and his band of cacos fought to defend the Haitian peopleâs rights. He was shot in the heart by a US marine. PĂ©ralte was Haitiâs Sandino, the Nicaraguan revolutionary who met a similar fate in 1934. Every institution in Haiti was hollowed out, their functions subordinated to the United States.
A âpeace loving nationâ invaded two other members of the League in the name of peace. But these exceptions were already baked into the Covenant. It said quite clearly, âNothing in this Covenant shall be deemed to affect the validity of international engagements, such as . . . regional understandings like the Monroe Doctrine, for securing the maintenance of peace.â The Monroe Doctrine of 1823, which the US understood as its right to the hemisphere, was quite legal since it allowed the imperialists a right to its dominions.
Japanâs representative to the League of Nations meeting was Baron Makino Nobuaki. His speech at the Versailles conference â tinged with naivetĂ© â put forward a âproposal to abolish racial discriminationâ. Nobuakiâs brief was narrow, as made clear by Foreign Minister Viscount Uchida Yasuya; this proposal would only apply to the members of the League of Nations, and not to the colonized territories. But even this principle was too much. Australia had officially adopted a White Australia Policy in 1901. Its Prime Minister William Morris Hughes would not tolerate such a proposal at the League. Both Britain and the United States of America agreed. The Japanese proposal fell by the wayside. Baron Nobuaki returned home furious; he was a patron of the ultra-nationalist groups whose role drove Japan towards its wars of aggression in Asia.
âINTERNATIONAL LAW HAS TO TREAT NATIVES AS UNCIVILIZEDâ
In the days of colonialism, there was no need for any justification. If a colonial power wanted to invade a territory, it could do so at will. Other colonial powers could object â and sometimes did â but this objection did not come on behalf of those who were being overrun; it came out of the competitive feeling between colonial powers. In 1884â85, the imperialist powers met in Berlin to carve up Africa. European powers and the United States vied for âeffective occupationâ and âspheres of influenceâ, phrases that disguised the brutal and cruel seizure of lands and the suppression of peopleâs aspirations. Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the United States carved out the landscape. A decade later, only Ethiopia, Morocco, and the Sultanates of Majeerteen and Hobyo remained relatively independent. Within decades France and Spain would seize Morocco, and the two sultanates would be taken by Italy, which would later fight a severe war against Ethiopia to seize it in 1936. All this was done through a legal framework which disenfranchised an entire continent to serve the needs of Europe and the United States.
John Westlake, the Cambridge University professor who pioneered international law and would later be a Liberal Member of Parliament, wrote in his 1894 textbook International Law,
[I]nternational law has to treat natives as uncivilised. It regulates, for the mutual benefit of civilised states, the claims which they make to sovereignty over the region and leaves the treatment of natives to the conscience of the state to which the sovereignty is awarded, rather than sanction their interest being made an excuse the more for war between civilised claimants, devastating the region and the cause of suffering to the natives themselves.
To protect the natives, in other words, they must give up their land and resources to the colonizers, who must themselves come to an understanding through international law so that they do not go to war with each other; it is to the benefit of the natives that they surrender and watch the imperialists divide up the loot. Thatâs the highest point of imperialist international law, which burrows itself into the conceptual framework of present-day international laws.
Legal fictions hovered over conquest, but there was no such disquiet over the massacres of entire peoples and cultures.
The First Geneva Convention (1864) emerged out of a sense of outrage at the large numbers of Europeans killed in battles in Europe. Two particular engagements disgusted the European public : the conflict in Crimea between 1853 and 1856, which claimed over 300,000 lives, and the Battle of Solferino in 1859, which claimed 40,000 lives in a single day. Out of these two wars came the First Geneva Convention and the International Committee for Relief to the Wounded (later the International Committee of the Red Cross). This law and this institution set the moral framework for warfare.
It would all fall apart during the First World War, when the technology of war eclipsed any moral framework. Chemical weapons and aerial bombardment removed the âhonourâ in warfare, making combat a matter of technological superiority rather than bravery. The impact of aerial bombardment was the most significant, since it meant that the divide between combatant and civilians began to dissolve in front of the technological ability to bomb civilian areas far behind the front lines of the battlefield. Further Geneva Conventions (1929, 1949) would follow, each trying to ameliorate the harshness of the new technologies of death. The Nazis had no qualms about civilian deaths, the prelude being the bombing of Guernica (Spain) in 1937. But the Allies were no less harsh. In 1942, the British government acknowledged that its bombing was to damage âthe morale of the enemy civil population and, in particular, the industrial workersâ. The 1945 Allied bombing of Dresden (Germany) is practice to the 1942 theory. The US novelist Kurt Vonnegut was in Dresden as a prisoner of war. Later, he wrote a devastating book about the bombing called Slaughterhouse-Five (1969). The dead littered the city. âThere were too many corpses to bury,â Vonnegut wrote. âSo instead the Nazis sent in troops with flamethrowers. All these civiliansâ remains were burned to ashes.â
The new technology of warfare â and the Holocaust â demanded that the West create the United Nations, and the UN Charter (1945). Europe had widened the jaws of hell for itself. Hell, on the other hand, had always been the condition in the colonies and for the colonized.
Thirteen hundred West African soldiers from Benin to Togo who had fought in the French army, been ...