Chapter 1
As I Have Loved You
The One Commandment
1. Love
Jesus said, âLove each other as I have loved youâ (John 15:12, emphasis added). He did not say, âLove each other as you like,â nor âLove each other as you can.â No. He said, âLove each other as I have loved you.â
Hence: for much that we fail to see it, for much that we are afraid to say it, we can love like Christ. We can love like Christ not because we want to, out of some grandiose desire of oursâto be like the Son of Godâbut because he said so; he said we shall love like him. Thus, we will not be proud when we assert this possibility, but faithfulâto him. By loving in such a way, we will be contributing to the emergence of a renewed Earth; an Earth crafted by those who are coherent with the teachings of Christ, by those who serve as conductors of the Spiritâs descent. To love as Christ is not just the way to be truthful to the words of Christ, it is Truth enabled. Such is the main sign of Christ carriersâof those who take the responsibility to be the Light in this world, of those who facilitate the transformation of the Earth.
2. Difficulty
Jesus said, âLove each other as I have loved you.â
The most striking implication of this statement is not the act of loveâthat is, to love one anotherâbut the qualification of such love: that it shall be a Christ-like Love. Without this qualification of love, the one Christian commandment would be incomplete, thus ineffective. As for loving each other, Christ is not needed: Would we deny the existence of relational or fraternal love in the times before Christ, or in those who do not follow the Way of Christ? No, we cannot deny such love, neither in the times before the Light came to stay nor in those who have not committed to the Way of endurance in the Light of being. Anyone who has traveled the world or established friendships beyond their own Christian community knows it: relational and fraternal love were not brought by Christ; Christ-like Love was brought by Christ.
Yet, some Christians forget the last part of the one commandmentâas if the statement âas I have loved youâ no longer existed. Such forgetfulness results in the mistaken divinization of affectionate love, because the âcommandment,â as they remember it, is to love each other. And so, certainly feeling affection for one another, they say among themselves: âWe do love each other as Christ commanded us, donât we?â But they forget: you do not need to follow the Way of Christ to love kindly, passionately, compassionately, or in a brotherly, motherly, or fatherly way, because these types of love and affection are not the Gift of Christ. Hence, erroneously assuming Love is a Christian givenâpresumed âto be thereâ if you are a Christianâsome Christians pay attention to just doing âthe right thing,â not giving enough consideration to the way they should loveâas Christ did.
Of course, the commandment of Christ to love like him is much more difficult to contemplate than the accumulation of deeds sufficient to feel that one is âgood enoughâ to be counted as the chosen sheep. But to love as Christ is not a Christian given. It cannot be bought by deeds, although it may be demonstrated in deeds; it cannot be thought of as affection, although it may be accompanied by affection. The command of Christ to love like him is difficult. It is difficult because it is inconvenient. It is inconvenient because it demands the questioning of our self and the transformation of our being. Even so, we should not allow the editing of Christâs words in our minds and our hearts. We should not allow the exile from our consciousness of the last part of the one Christian commandment just because it is inconvenient for us. We cannot say that to love one another is the Christian commandment. Only the commandment to love as Christ is faithful to the words of Christ.
3. Denial
Jesus said, âLove each other as I have loved you.â
Without this qualification of love, Christ is denied. That is, if we reject the possibility to love as Christ, we are denying the Christ in usâwe decide to not-know the Light of being, and to not-be his living witnesses in the world. Moreover, by denying the Christ in us, we are refusing to embody the Way of Christ: we are battling his call (to follow him), his teaching (to be the Light of the world), and his prayerâthat the love with which the Father loved him may be in us, and that he (the Light through and of which things are made) may be in us. Even more, we are rejecting the fruit of his Sacrificeâthe Atonement of our being for its participation in the Light of sentient creation, which is Christ himself, as Logos and Being.
Christ-like Love is dependent on Divine Light expressed in the context of human relationships. This Light is difficult to bear because it challenges our conceptions of âselfâ and âotherâ by calling us to perfection in Spirit, both as individuals and as a community. For this reason, many are those who misallocate Christian Love from the domain of divinized relationships to the context of superficial interactions, thus making it dependent not on Divine Light but on kindness. In these environments, Christ is imagined as a âsinlessâ Good Shepherd in whom the higher complexity of his mighty characterâas Light, Life, and Truthâis absent. Accordingly, contemporary Christians emphasize kindness instead of Truth; politeness instead of Love. But Truth and not kindness, and Love and not politeness, is what Christ taught. Indeed, Christ was less kind than most well-minded Christians want to be and possibly are: Christ used the whip and turned over the tables of the money changers at the temple; Christ did not wait for his called ones to bury their relatives; Christ rejected brotherhood based on blood in front of his brothers and his mother; Christ publicly called the religious leaders of his time âhypocrites!â and âbrood of vipers!â; and Christ told the fruitless fig tree to wither away. His power was not in his kindness but in the Fatherâs will and the Spirit. Christ demanded truthfulness, forgiveness, commitment, insight, wisdom, and, above all, Love of divine standardsâ standards set by him, supported by conditions set by him through his Office and Sacrifice. Without the qualification of Love to be as Christâsâthe standards set by the Son of GodâChrist is denied as a matter of course.
On the other hand, by taking the responsibility of such Love, we will be ...