CASE
To Twit or Not to Twit: That Is the Question!
Twitter is a for-profit corporation that earns its revenue through advertisements on its platform. âTwitter is a âmicrobloggingâ system that allows you to send and receive short posts called tweets⌠. Twitter users follow other users. If you follow someone you can see their tweets in your twitter âtimelineâ. You can choose to follow people and organisations with similar academic and personal interests to you⌠. Twitter has become increasingly popular with academics as well as students, policymakers, politicians and the general public.â (Economic and Social Research Council, n.d. âWhat Is Twitter and Why Should You Use It?â https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/social-media/twitter/what-is-twitter/, 1/19/2021.)
One of the largest and most profitable users of Twitter has been US President Donald Trump. He has used this platform, as well as other forms of social media, to reach his followers because he believes that traditional news media (television, the press) do not give a fair account of his actions. This included his belief that he won the 2020 election and that it was stolen from him. On January 9, 2021, just after the incident at the US Capitol Building, Twitter suspended Presidentâs Trumpâs Twitter account, claiming he was at least partially responsible for the incident based upon his claims about the election results.
Several media experts have blamed social media platforms like Twitter for providing a forum for hate groups to spread their radicalism and said that these groupsâ posts present a clear and present danger to the community (which they argued fueled the incident). They believe these firms must take responsibility for providing these forums and be held accountable to the public and applauded Twitterâs suspension of the presidentâs account. (Ortutay, Barbara and Tari Arbel, June 29, 2020. âSocial Media Platforms Face a Reckoning Over Hate Speechâ AP News, https://apnews.com/article/6d0b3359ee5379bd5624c9f1024a0eaf, 1/19/2021.)
Democratic societies, however, are predicated upon the notion that individuals have the right to express their ideas and that limiting anyoneâs access to social media, especially a public figure like the president of the United States, is a violation of the right to free speech under the first amendment. The public cannot make informed choices if all views are not available to them. However, âFirst Amendment protections against government censorship do not apply if Twitter âdecides it is not going to participate in disseminating someone elseâs message,â said Jeremy Mishkin, a lawyer with Montgomery McCracken in Philadelphia who practices First Amendment law. A newspaper, for instance, is not required to publish a politicianâs news release, Mishkin said.â (Hanna, Maddie 1/9/21. âDoes Twitterâs Ban Violate Trumpâs Free-Speech Rights? Likely Not, but It Raises Questions About Social Media Platforms, Philly Experts Say,â The Philadelphia Inquirer, www.inquirer.com/news/twitter-bans-trump-free-speech-first-amendment-20210109.html, 1/19/21.)
This action by Twitter, and later by other social media companies, including Facebook, raises the question as to what âprotected speechâ is in a social media age and how much authority and control social media companies should have in determining what is posted in the marketplace of ideas given their profit motive, which includes protecting themselves from liability that may be associated with radical posts.
- What are the main ethical issues when it comes to Twitter and the way they operate?
- What are some of the social problems affecting Twitter?
- Identify the key stakeholders in this case.
- If you were the president of Twitter, what nonmarket actions would you take relative to the stakeholders addressed in question 3?