1. Introduction
Over the last decade, the Internet and digital technologies have fundamentally changed the way we interact, communicate, and store information. These technology tools and services, such as emails, data files, photos, videos, social network sites, and blogs are embedded in many aspects of our daily lives – at work, in our personal life, entertainment and civic behaviour. Consequently, we continue to generate and store substantial amounts of data throughout our lifetime. Recently, many researchers and technology designers have considered issues related to this information being made available about someone following their death – also known as digital legacy [1, 2]. The information that is stored as an online form becomes a digital asset [1, 2], which can be, for instance, photos, videos, music, emails, and blogs. These digital assets can originate from or be stored on: (a) online services including websites, social media, emails, and cloud services; and (b) digital devices, such as hard disks, mobile phones, and laptops [3].
School of Computer Science, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
While researchers and technology designers for digital legacy systems have focused on providing services (e.g., remembering the bereaved to sharing information with loved ones), little research has gone into preserving the privacy of the deceased person [4, 5], a.k.a. afterlife privacy or, more recently, digital immortal privacy [6]. Currently, there are no standard laws governing digital immortal privacy. In the absence of these digital immortal privacy laws, regulation of both the privacy and the digital asset rights of the deceased will fall under the service terms of the digital intermediary platforms where the digital assets are stored, such as social networks, cloud services, blogs, and emails [4, 7]. In such a situation, it is most likely that any future disputes or disagreements on digital immortal privacy will be handled by intermediary digital platforms and the beneficiaries of the deceased, provided they have the rights granted [4, 7]. The rights of the digital platforms are usually determined by their own unilaterally dictated terms of service, and rights granted to the beneficiaries are determined by succession laws [4, 7]. In both cases, neither side of this conflict has the best interests in preserving privacy of the deceased [4, 7].
In our literature review on digital legacy systems and digital immortal privacy, there is no work on designing a framework or solutions that offer users granular access to the digital asset and preserve digital immortal privacy. Such a system would provide enhanced user experience and greater flexibility to the digital asset owner in order to share digital assets with their loved ones. While digital assets can be broad – photos, emails, music files, data files, blogs, there is some work done on email digital assets in this area by Google [8]. Google has implemented the Inactive account manager for its users to share their data (organised into folders) with nominated persons in an event there is no activity for a specific time period [8]. However, this is still coarse-grained, where entire folders will be shared and thus may not have the appropriate privacy protection for the deceased. Preserving digital immortal privacy and providing a fine-grained access control mechanism is a challenge as most digital assets are heterogeneous and have unstructured data [1, 8–11].
To address the need for enhanced user experience and greater flexibility with granular access to the digital asset and to preserve digital immortal privacy in digital legacy systems, we have designed a digital legacy framework for big data – DigImoPriv–that will provide the digital asset owner defined policies with a fine-grained access mechanism. These defined policies delivered through the access control mechanism will protect the Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in the digital asset against unauthorised access, thus preserving digital immortal privacy. There are two types of users defined in the digital legacy framework, the owner of the digital asset and the bereaved. The bereaved is the contact who has been given access to digital assets by the owner. The authentication and appropriate access to the folders are determined by a policy-based access control mechanism. DigImoPriv will have an intelligent data classifier to annotate the contents of the digital asset based on data labels into categories, such as private, confidential, unrestricted, or even events/sentiments, such as happy and sad moments. These components in DigImoPriv will work together with the support of a synchronous system – a timer that would periodically check the owner’s living status by checking the user’s online activity. In the event of no activity, the system will send invitations to the nominated persons or contacts to access the digital asset. The novelty of this solution is in the design of DigImoPriv, which brings the three components working together, i.e., a policy-based access control mechanism to provide the fine-grained access control, the logic required to categorise the PII contents of the digital asset that will preserve digital immortal privacy and the synchronous system to monitor the digital asset owner’s activity. In this chapter, our research problem is to find an approach to protect digital immortal privacy and provide a fine-grained access control mechanism to the digital asset, as data within the digital assets are heterogeneous and unstructured. The main contributions of this work are:
- We define use case scenarios where digital immortal privacy was important to the digital asset owner.
- We propose high-level system requirements that address the issues in digital immortal privacy and enables a fine-grained access control mechanism to the digital asset.
- We provide a thorough literature review in the areas of digital legacy systems, digital immortal privacy, PII, and access control mechanisms.
- We present DigImoPriv that addresses digital immortal privacy to the digital asset owner and enables a fine-grained access control mechanism to the digital asset.
- We instantiate DigImoPriv by considering emails as digital assets and discuss solution details.
- We present future research opportunities in digital immortal privacy and fine-grained access control in digital legacy systems.
This chapter is organised as follows. Section 2 defines four scenarios where the digital asset owner’s digital immortal privacy was violated. Following the scenarios section, we enumerate the high-level requirements. Section 3 reviews various research approaches in digital legacy systems, PII and different access control mechanisms. Section 4 presents the proposed idea, design of the digital legacy framework, define the high-level system model, different entities and the general overview. Section 5 explains the detailed design of the digital legacy framework using email digital asset as an example. Section 6 concludes this work and provides research directions for future work.