Rightly considered the most systematic of German idealists, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770ā1831) elaborated a comprehensive philosophical system which, he believed, could consistently explain how everything in the world, including our thoughts, is interrelated. It is hard to overestimate his ambition and the complexity of his undertaking, which, together with the highly abstract metaphysical background of his philosophy, has led to a number of misinterpretations and misconceptions about both his philosophical project and its results. Hegelās writings are difficult to read and comprehend, yet his many valuable insights into numerous topics remain philosophically significant today and secure for him a permanent place in philosophy and its history.
This chapter sketches the thinkerās life and views him in the context of his historical time and intellectual milieu. It does not attempt to discuss all the nuances of Hegelās intellectual development. There are many outstanding biographies of Hegel published only in recent years (Pinkard 2000; Althaus 2000; Fulda 2003; Vieweg 2019), and it would be hard to surpass either their details or their breadth. My more modest aim is to explore links between Hegelās life, philosophical ideas, and specific intellectual context that together can provide the context necessary for a thorough understanding of the thinker and his ideas.
This chapter examines the most formative and decisive periods of Hegelās life, which either significantly impacted his thought or reflected some notable changes in his philosophical views. It begins with a discussion of the early stage of Hegelās intellectual development, which focuses on his life in Stuttgart (most notably 1777ā1788), then turns to Hegelās time in Tűbingen and his interactions with Hƶlderlin and Schelling that proved to be instrumental to his philosophical self-awareness (1788ā1793). The third section considers the transitional years between his time as a student and the beginning of his academic career, as he first tries his hand at writing philosophical essays (1793ā1800), the fourth turns to Hegelās stay at Jena where he successfully launched his university career (1801ā1806), the fifth section draws from Hegelās years outside the university (1807ā1816), the sixth examines a short two-year period at Heidelberg, and the final, seventh, section addresses the Berlin period, perhaps the most productive of Hegelās philosophical career (1818ā1831). I thus aim to consider Hegel in his natural setting, i.e. the historical and intellectual context that shaped him as an individual and influenced the development of his philosophical thought.
1 Early Life and First Encounter with Philosophy
The son of Georg Ludwig Hegel and Maria Magdalena Louisa, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was born on 27 August, 1770 in Stuttgart, the capital of the Duchy of WĆ¼rttemberg. The youngest of six children, only he, his sister Christiane Luise, and his brother Georg Ludwig survived into adulthood. Throughout his life Hegel was plagued by health difficulties and, in his early years, suffered through several life-threatening illnesses. Hegelās father, Georg Hegel, had studied law at Tűbingen University and eventually became a secretary to the revenue office at the court of Wűrttemberg. Equally impressive, Hegelās mother was unusually educated for a woman of her time.
The Hegel family was moderately well off in comparison to other households, which allowed them to move close to the ānon-noble notablesā (Ehrbarkeit) āwho staffed the Wűrttemberg assembly of estates and who had a near-monopoly on the better, more prestigious positions in WĆ¼rttembergā (Pinkard 2000, 5). However, Hegelās family was not part of this establishment and had to rely on education and the opportunities procured through their hard work and talent instead of familial or social connections. As a child, at the age of three, Hegel began attending German School. In addition, his mother taught him Latin at home, and by the time he was placed in Latin School, he already knew basic Latin. No doubt, this emphasis on education and learning would characterize Hegelās views on the role education (both as schooling and as enculturation [Bildung]) would play in the modern world.
When Hegel was eleven, his mother died from bilious fever (a sort of acute intestinal or malarial fever) that spread through Stuttgart. Hegel himself barely survived and, as a result of the disease, developed a speech impediment characterized by stuttering and periodic gasping, with which he had to cope his entire life. His motherās death had a lasting, traumatic impact on the young boy, who was now left in the care of his father.
In 1784, Hegel was admitted to the Gymnasium Illustre in Stuttgart. The school, like many others during this period, was unorderly and in a state of partial disarray. Nonetheless, it managed to combine Enlightenment thought with the Protestant humanism of the Renaissance, thus giving Hegel a sense of both tradition and progress in his youth. The decision to send the boy to the Gymnasium was likely a compromise between his father, who wanted to provide Hegel with an Enlightenment education, and his deceased motherās desire to see her son studying theology at Tűbingen. As some of the seats at Tűbingen were reserved for students who attended the Gymnasium, Hegel could get an Enlightenment education and still be qualified for a theological career (Pinkard 2000, 8).
One of the most significant influences on Hegelās thought during this period was his friendship with Professor Jacob Friedrich von Abel, a faculty member of the Karlsschule, a unique educational institution founded by Duke Karl Eugen of WĆ¼rttemberg to train officials and high ranking military officers in the new sciences.1 Hegelās sister wrote that von Abel āfosteredā Hegel (or made him his āprotĆ©gĆ©ā), so it should be no surprise that, when Abel voiced his opinion on the debate surrounding Kantās Critique of Pure Reason and Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics through the publication of his 1787 book Versuch Ć¼ber die Natur der speculativen Vernunft zur PrĆ¼fung des Kantischen Systems (An Essay on the Nature of Speculative Reason for a Test of the Kantian System), Hegel would take his mentorās opinion very seriously.
Abelās book sought to defend the traditional rationalist metaphysical stance against Kantās claims that positive metaphysical knowledge of the world is impossible, and that all one can know is the negative claim that there are metaphysical things. Moreover, in light of the view that God is a metaphysical being, Kantās argument held that one cannot know anything of God. It was this line of thought that Professor Abel attacked in his book, which claimed that the world simply must have a creator and that this divine creator establishes the relation of our experience to the world (Pinkard 2000, 13). This book was one of Hegelās first introductions to Kantās philosophy, and given the influence that his mentor had on him, it is likely that Hegel would have been inclined to have a highly critical view of Kantās philosophy. Indeed, his anti-Kantianism seems to be confirmed by his dismissive attitude toward Kantian philosophy over the next several years.
While Hegel might have held less than enthusiastic views about Kantās philosophical system, he was greatly swayed by Gotthold Ephraim Lessing (1729ā1781), whose attitude toward philosophy and education of the general public made a substantial impact on Hegelās intellectual development. In a letter to Hegel, one of his contemporaries, Karl Joseph Hieronymus Windischmann, observes:
The study of your system of science has convinced me that someday, when the time for understanding has come, this work will be viewed as the elementary text of human emancipation, as the key to the new Gospel announced by Lessing. (Letters 558)
Lessing, a philosopher, writer, publicist, and art critic, was widely regarded as one of the German-speaking worldās most prominent āmen of letters.ā In particular, Hegel became fascinated with Lessingās role as an āeducator of the peopleā (Volkserzieher) and envisioned a similar future for himself. His diary was filled with musings on what being an educator of the people entailed, and what exactly he would teach all of them.2
2 Time in TĆ¼bingen: Acquaintance with Hƶlderlin and Schelling, and Lived Experience of the French Revolution
In 1788, Hegel began his studies at the TĆ¼binger Stift, a Protestant theological Seminary, which he entered with the intent of studying theology and eventually becoming a Lutheran pastor.3 Many commentators and biographers of Hegel underscore the idyllic setting of the Stift on the bank of the Neckar River and the glorious traditions of this oldest of theological institutions, whose roots can be traced to the Middle Ages (see Plant 1999). Yet, at the time of Hegelās arrival, the Stift was in such a state of decline that it was in danger of closing altogether: the lecturing material was antiquated, the professoriate was comprised of amateurs who were only able to teach in virtue of their family relationships or friendship with the Stift administration, and the Seminaryās antiquated mission of providing corrective attitudes towards the students was oppressive. Thus, it should not come as a surprise that Hegelās initial reaction was one of overwhelming disappointment and discouragement. Nonetheless, two major events that happened during Hegelās stay in TĆ¼bingen altered the course of his life f...