Abstract
Employing Africancentric Methodology (i.e., the systematic inquiry of knowledge as a commonality of cultural traits among the diverse peoples of Africa which characterize and constitute a worldly perspective that is somehow distinct from that of the foreign world views that have influenced African peoples), this chapter aims to fill a major gap in the study of digital communication. It does so by discussing the Ancient Kemetian/Egyptian genesis of the technology (i.e., the exchange of information in signal or symbolic form), how it is being used today, and how it can be advanced. The chapter reveals that the genesis of digital communication was Ancient Kemet, a verity that will come as a huge surprise to those who think that the technology is a recent invention. In fact, it was the Ancient Kemetians and other Africans who invented the number zero (0) and the binary code, without which the binary digit system on which modern computing is based would not have been possible. But, quite perplexing is that universities in todayâs Egypt which should be exploring, teaching, and advancing this technology are too caught up into promoting Eurocentric digital communication technology to do so.
Introduction
That the genesis of digital communication (i.e., the exchange of information in signal or symbolic form) was Ancient Kemet/Egypt will come as a huge stupefaction to those who perceive the technology to be a recent invention. In fact, as I have discussed elsewhere, it was the Ancient Kemetians/Egyptians and other Africans who invented the number zero (0) and the binary code, without which the binary digit system on which modern computing is based would not have been possible (Bangura 2011, 2012). But, quite perplexing is that universities in todayâs Egypt which should be exploring, teaching, and advancing this technology are too caught up into promoting Eurocentric digital communication technology to do so. For instance, the American University in Cairo (AUC), one of the leading Egyptian academic institutions teaching and researching digital media communication technology, offers the following Eurocentric courses on the subject, none of which includes Ancient Kemetian digital communication technology in its content, much less being exclusively on it:
- (a)
âECNG 210/2101âDigital Logic Design (3 cr.): The nature of digital logic and numbering systems. Boolean algebra, Karnaugh map, decision-making elements, memory elements, latches, flip-flops, design of combinational and sequential circuits, integrated circuits and logic families, shift registers, counters and combinational circuits, adders, subtracters, multiplication and division circuits, memory types. Exposure to logic design automation software. Introduction to FPGAs and HDLâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
- (b)
âECNG 218L/2108LâDigital Logic Design Lab (1 cr.): The laboratory component will cover experiments in digital design and experiments illustrating material of course ECNG 2101 including an FPGA-based projectâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
- (c)
âECNG 413/4103âTesting of Digital Circuits (3 cr.): Basic concepts behind testing digital circuits. Causes of permanent and temporary failures. Test pattern generation techniques including exhaustive, Pseudo-exhaustive, Path sensitization, Critical path, Random and Pseudo-random Testing. Design for testability methods for testing Integrated Circuits. Techniques for testing Printed circuit boardsâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
- (d)
âECNG 414/4104âHigh Level Digital ASIC Design Using CAD (3 cr.): Design of digital application-specific integrated circuits (ASICS) using synthesis CAD tools. Topics include the following: design flow, hierarchical design, hardware description languages such as VHDL, synthesis, design verification, IC test, chip-scale synchronous design, field programmable gate arrays, mask programmable gate arrays, CMOS circuits and IC process technology. For the project, students will design and implement a significant digital system using field programmable gate arraysâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
- (e)
âECNG 3201/MACT 3224/ENGR 3202 concurrent with ECNG 4314L: Review of signal representation and classification, time and frequency domains, Fourier transform; Energy and power spectral density. Basics of analog communication: amplitude, angle, and pulse modulation; modulators and demodulators; frequency division multiplexing. Introduction to digital communication: Review of sampling and quantization; pulse code modulation (PCM), Delta Modulation, Differential PCM, time division multiplexing, line codes; the matched filter. Introduction to Random Processes. Noise in communication systemsâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
- (f)
âECNG 421/4302âFundamentals of Communications II (3 cr.): Fundamentals of Digital Communications. Geometric Representation of Signals; Binary and M-ary Modulation and their Performance Analysis and Spectral Efficiency M-ary Baseband Transmission. Introduction to Information Theory and Source and Channel Coding; Channel Capacity; Block and Convolutional Codes. Introduction to Spread-Spectrum Communications and Discrete Multitone (DMT). Several experiments are conducted in the Communication Lab to illustrate the material covered in the courseâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
- (g)
âECNG 2101/ECNG 3106/ECNG 3502 and concurrent with ECNG 4509L: Microcontroller architecture (ARM, Motorola 68HC11). Interrupts, serial and parallel Input/Output, Timers, Analog-to-Digital and Digital-to-Analog conversion, Watchdog timers, I/O expansion, Interfacing to keypads and display devices, AC control, Introduction to RISC and CISCâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
- (h)
âECNG 453/4503 - Microcontroller System Design (3 cr.) and concurrent with ECNG 4509L: Microcontroller architecture (ARM, Motorola 68HC11). Interrupts, serial and parallel Input/Output, Timers, Analog-to-Digital and Digital-to-Analog conversion, Watchdog timers, I/O expansion, Interfacing to keypads and display devices, AC control, Introduction to RISC and CISCâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
- (i)
âECNG 510/5210âAdvanced Solid-State Devices (3 cr.): This course covers crystal structures, band gap theory, ionic equilibrium theory, fundamentals of carrier transport, compound semiconductors III-V. This course will make special emphasis on the properties of various types of junctions (p-n junctions, heterojunctions, metal-semiconductor junctions) leading to various electronic devices such as field effect transistors (FETs), metal oxide-semiconductor FETS (MOSFETs), high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs), etc. Short Channel effects and nanoscale phenomena will be emphasized throughout the course and their impact on device modeling in analog and digital circuitsâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
- (j)
âECNG 517/5217âDigital Integrated Circuit Design (3 cr.): The Diode (DC and Dynamic Behavior), The MOSFET (DC and Dynamic Behavior as well as short channel effects), The CMOS inverter (Static and Dynamic Behavior - Power / Speed Tradeoffs), Combinational Logic Gates (Static CMOS Design, Transistor Sizing, Static vs. Dynamic logic styles, Power / Speed Tradeoffs), Sequential Logic Circuits (Static and Dynamic circuits/flipflops, Power / Speed Tradeoffs), Low Power Circuit Techniques, Memory circuit design and power / reliability consideration, arithmetic logic blocks (adders/multipliers) and its designâ (AUC 2019, p. 1).
In light of the glaring negligence in the exploration, teaching, and advancement of Ancient Kemetian digital communication technology, this chapter seeks to contribute toward filling this gap in the subject. It does so by discussing the Kemetian genesis of the technology, how it is being used today, and how it can be advanced. But before doing all this, I must first very briefly describe the Africancentric Methodology that undergirds the analysis for the sake of cohesion. The reader interested in more details can consult the works cited in the following section.
Africancentric Methodology: Very Briefly
As I relay in more depth in my books titled African-Centered Research Methodologies: From Ancient Times to the Present (Bangura 2011), African Mathematics: From Bones to Computers (Bangura 2012), Toyin Falola and African Epistemologies (Bangura 2015a), and Falolaism: The Epistemologies and Methodologies of Africana Knowledge (Bangura 2019), and my essays titled âThe Colors of the Flag of Sierra Leone: An Africancentric Analysisâ (Bangura 2015b) and âBo School Symbols: A Deep African-Centered Analysisâ (Bangura 2015c), from the late 1980s to the mid-1990s, many, and consistent, definitions of Africancentricity were proffered by Africanists. The first definition was by Molefi Kete Asante who defined âAfrocentricity [African-centered] as the placing of African ideals at the center of any analysis that involves African culture and behaviorâ (1987, p. 6). The second definition was by C. Tsehloane Keto who defined the âAfrican-centered perspective [as an approach that] rests on the premise that it is valid to position Africa as a geographical and cultural starting base in the study of peoples of African descentâ (1989, p. 1). The third definition was by Wade Nobles who defined âAfrocentric, Africentric, or African-Centered [as being] interchangeable terms representing the concept which categorizes a quality of thought and practice which is rooted in the cultural image and interest of African people and which represents and reflects the life experiences, history, and traditions of African people as the center of analyses. It is therein that the intellectual and philosophical foundation [with] which African people should create their own scientific criterion for authenticating human realityâ exists (1990, p. 47). The fourth definition was by Maulana Karenga who defined âAfrocentricityâŚas a quality of thought and practice rooted in the cultural image and human interest of African people [and their descendants]. To be rooted in the cultural image of African people is to be anchored in the views and values of African people as well as in the practice which emanates from and gives rise to these views and valuesâ (1993, p. 36). Finally, Lathardus Goggins II defined âAfrican-centered [as being able] to construct and use frames of reference, cultural filters and behaviors that are consistent with the philosophies and heritage of African cultures in order to advance the interest of people of African descentâ (1996, p. 18).
I add that from the preceding definitions, it is obvious that Africancentricity presupposes knowledge of a commonality of cultural traits among the diverse peoples of Africa which characterize and constitute a worldly view that is somehow distinct from that of the foreign world views that have influenced African peoples. Africancentricity simply means that the universe is a collection of relationships, and an individual or a group being in that universe is defined by and dependent upon these relationships. Africans, prior to European and Asian dominance, and still to some degree now, considered the Cause or God as being a part of His creation while Europeans on the other hand considered God separate from His creation.
Also, I point out that Asante suggests that in the analysis of what he calls the âthree fundamental Afrocentric themes of transcendent discourse: (1) human relations, (2) humansâ relationship to the supernatural, and (3) humansâ relationships to their own beingâ (1987, p. 168) that if done with an awareness of the interrelatedness of these themes, a greater understanding of the African being will be acquired...