Similar to its âparentâ concept âglobal citizenshipâ, global citizenship education represents something of an enigma to the extent to which the term is now fairly ubiquitous within academic discourse yet defies clear, precise andâperhaps more importantlyâconsistent definition. Global citizenship education, for example, lacks clear disciplinary boundaries, and is permeated by themes such as peace education, human rights education, education for sustainable development, social justice education, education for cultural diversity and futures education. Not only do these terms fall within global citizenship education but some of them, such as peace education, human rights education and education for sustainable development, are identifiable and similarly contested fields in their own rights. In general terms, global citizenship education is posited as crucial for ensuring that students understand a wide range of global trends that impact upon themselves and upon others. These trends include technological developments, increased migration, food security/insecurity, the existence and prevalence of diseases (pandemic, or otherwise), transnational political organisations, multinational corporations, globalised financial systems and institutions, fair and free trade and international terrorism. Furthermore, central to most formulations of global citizenship education is the belief that students need to develop what has generally been termed a global consciousness , perceiving themselves as citizens of the world and learning the requisite capacities to participate actively in global(ised) communities. Furthermore, and as the discussion in Chap. 2 examines, global citizenship education can be conceptualised from a range of theoretical positions and as serving various ends.
Writing nearly a decade ago, Marshall (2011: 10) highlighted the lack of studies examining âhow schools negotiate the tensions between ⌠[the various] agendasâ that global citizenship education can serve. Despite the increase in empirical studies of global citizenship education over the last decade in a variety of contexts (for example, IsraelâYemini & Fulop, 2015; Yemini & Furstenburg, 2018; Goren & Yemini, 2016; South KoreaâKim, 2019; Pak & Lee, 2018; LebanonâGhosn-Chelala, 2020; New ZealandâTallon, 2012; Milligan, Taylor, & Wood, 2011; USAâRapoport, 2010; DiCicco, 2016; CanadaâSchweisfurth, 2006; ChinaâWoods & Kong, 2020; multiple contextsâDill, 2013; Walsh & Casinader, 2019), there remains a need for more, and more detailed, empirical studies that illuminate how global citizenship education is understood, practiced and experienced by teachers and students.
The purpose of this present book is to give consideration and attention to forms of global citizenship education in Australia. More specifically, drawing on research collected from six Australian high schools, the book examines the perceptions and practices of school leaders, teachers and students to provide a much needed empirical understanding of how school teachers interpret policy and curricula intentions around global citizenship education and how students experience global citizenship education in practice. By focusing on Australia as a particular case, the analysis and arguments of the book will be of relevance and significance to those working in other contexts in which global citizenship is identifiable as an aim and outcome of education and schooling.
The remainder of this introduction consists of three main sections. The first provides a brief context of global citizenship education in Australia in order to situate the analysis offered in the chapters that follow. The second section provides details of the empirical study on which this book is based, setting out the aims, research questions, methods, sample and participants. The third section lays out the structure of the book. In the pages that follow I seek to portray and examine the ways that global citizenship education manifests in Australian schools at the lower secondary level. From the outset it should be acknowledged that the focus on global learning in Australia is not a completely contemporary phenomenon. Wierenga et al. (2008), for example, trace global citizenship education in Australia back to the 1970s and the educational programs of several development organisations, such as Oxfam and World Vision, and similar histories of global learning exist in other countries. However, in Australia, as elsewhere, the meaning of global citizenship and global citizenship education remains elusive, multifarious and contested. That this is so is not helped by the dearth of empirical studies that engage with the actual existing practices of schools. My hope is that this present book helps towards addressing this gap.
Global Citizenship Education in Australia: A Brief Context
Before offering some brief background comments by way of locating global citizenship education in the Australian context, it is worth saying something about the wider global policy agenda around global citizenship education. At the level of global policy, the increasing importance of global citizenship education is exemplified by a range of conferences, proposals and initiatives since the early 1990s that have recognised and promoted the need for young people around the world to learn about the nature of global issues and to do so through participatory pedagogies. While there is not space to recount all of the various initiatives in full here, key examples include the following: the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992; the United Nationsâ Agenda 21 action plan; the 1993 UNESCO report World Plan of Action for Education on Human Rights and Democracy (UNESCO, 1993); the United Nationsâ Decade for Human Rights Education (1995â2004); the UNESCO Education for All conferences (Jomtein in 1990 and Dakar in 2000); and the Millennium Declaration; and, the United Nationsâ Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) (2005â2014).
More recently the UN Secretary-Generalâs Global Education First Initiative placed the fostering of global citizenship as one of its three priorities:
It is not enough for education to produce individuals who can read, write and count. Education must be transformative and bring shared values to life. It must cultivate an active care for the world and for those with whom we share it. Education...