1
Why We Might Not Pray as We Should
I do not mean to discount the reasons others write about for not praying, such as the flesh, weak faith, or sin in a person's life, but I would like to add some prayer discouragers that do not seem to be sufficiently addressed. I would also like to resolve them so that rather than being discouragers to prayer, they become encouragers.
There are many reasons why we as Christians do not pray as we should, but there are also many great resources to address the normal reasons Christians fail to pray as we should. This book is not trying to replace those, but rather, I pray, contribute to encouraging Christians to pray. I seek to address some of the lesser spoken of belief issues that hinder passionate and consistent prayer. This chapter suggests some of the thoughts, questions, and considerations that can discourage prayer; we will seek to clear them up in the remainder of the book. To summarize what this book will address, consider the following:
ā¢If God is in sovereign control of everything, and if he is omniscient (foreknows the future), how can our prayers change things? How can we change tomorrow by praying if God already knows what is going to happen tomorrow? Would that not make God wrong, or at least in a position of having to learn from our prayers?
ā¢If our prayers are meaningful in the sense that they change events, how can God be sovereign? If there are almost eight billion people on earth, and Christians are offering up hundreds of thousands of prayers to change things, how can God eternally know the future; how can he be sovereign over a future that is changed by the prayers of his people?
ā¢If we are to pray for God's will to be done (Matt 6:10), and if God's will is set from eternity (Eph 1:11), then why should we think our prayers can change anything? If God's will is perfect, can we change that, and if we did, would that make it a less perfect will?
ā¢If God's will is perfect, and it is, do we even want to change it?
ā¢Since we must pray, āYour will be done,ā and his will is most assuredly going to be done, what is the point of making our requests known to God? Should we not just pray āYour will be doneā and be done with it?
In light of these thoughts, it is understandable why we struggle to be passionate about making our requests known to God. When we just think about the biblical teaching that prayer changes things and events, we do OK Conversely, when we think about God, who knows everything and is working everything according to his divine plan, we are OK But when we think about how those two realities work together, confusion abounds. And this confusion can hinder our prayer life, which is closely followed by the partner to a weak prayer life, which is a cold and distant relationship with God. Focusing too much on the power of prayer to change things will diminish our respect and understanding of Godās sovereignty and will. Focusing too much on Godās divine immutable will and sovereignty will erode our belief in the essentialness of prayer, as far as being able to walk with God and see changes in outcomes from our prayers.
Not understanding how these two realities work together is a prayer killer, finally arriving at praying out of believing that whether I pray or do not pray, things will work out according to Godās sovereign will. Although we continue to pray out of obedience because we are told to pray (Matt 6:9ā15), we do so hoping it will help in some way. As we say, you can always pray even if you cannot do anything else. Sometimes involving that if we can do something else, we should prioritize that over prayer.
We agree that God is sovereign, God knows all things, and God is in control, which are all true. But what do they mean concerning prayer, and particularly in the area of the Bibleās conditional promises? A conditional is a statement or command made with a stated or implied corresponding dependent outcome. The outcome is based on meeting the condition. For example, Jesus said, āWhatever you ask in My name, that will I doā (John 14:13). The condition is to ask in Jesusā name, and the outcome or promise is that if you ask, he will do what you ask. Quite commonly, but not always, āifā identifies conditionals or if not by the word āif,ā by the idea of āif.ā Another example of a conditional is Matt 6:14, which says, āFor if you forgive others for their transgressions, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.ā The Fatherās forgiveness of us is conditioned on whether or not we forgive others. When Scripture calls on humans to choose between options with corresponding consequences, that is a conditional.
While comfort surely is derived from such beliefs as Godās sovereignty and omniscience, these beliefs can also leave us confused about how prayer fits in with these great truths, which leaves us with a less passionate prayer life; at least we are not praying with a strong belief that our prayers matter in how things develop or end up. Further weakening of our prayer life often takes place when we pray for something, and nothing happens, or even worse, things go from bad to dreadful. After that happens a few times, even if we do not say it out loud, we can begin to wonder if our prayers matter. We may also begin to question if prayer can truly change an event or outcome. Meaning, will the outcome of what I pray about be different if I pray than if I had not prayed at all? If so, how, and how will I know? Are there things we cannot change with prayer? If so, how can we know them?
The Holy Spirit commands us, āSo then do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord isā (Eph 5:17). To which, we all can say a hearty amen! But the nagging questions that come on the heels of our amen are: Where does prayer fit in with the will of the Lord? What about all the areas that Scripture does not speak to directly? How do Scriptures that tell us to pray specifically, which clearly either imply or even explicitly state that outcomes depend on our praying, matter in light of Godās sovereign will?
Paul tells us, āWith all prayer and petition pray at all timesā (Eph 6:18a). Every other aspect of preparation for spiritual warfare outlined in Eph 6:10ā21 has a specific protective element to it. But the instruction to pray seems to be a general directive that permeates all areas of protection and spiritual armor and warfare. Then, in the next verse, Paul personally requests prayer saying, āpray on my behalfā (Eph 6:19a). As Paul has done, we also request others to pray on our behalf. But do we pray for others as though their life, or ours, will be different if we pray than if we do not pray, believing Mark 11:23ā24? You know, how does praying for someone matter in light of the truth that āalso we . . . having been predestined according to His purpose who works all things after the counsel of His willā (Eph 1:11)?
Think about this specific prayer request of Paul. āAnd pray on my behalf, that utterance may be given to me in the opening of my mouth, to make known with boldness the mystery of the gospel, for which I am an ambassador in chains; that in proclaiming it I may speak boldly, as I ought to speakā (Eph 6:19ā20). This specific request raises the question, could the prayers of the Ephesians really have impacted the spread of the gospel? Could their prayers have impacted people hearing the gospel and even being saved? That is to say, would Paulās spreading of the gospel have been different or even more effective if the Ephesians prayed than it would be if they did not pray?
We find this kind of emphasis on prayer making a difference throughout Scripture, but, again, how do we reconcile this with āYour will be done,ā other people having free will, and the outcome of the gospel encounter (Matt 26:42)? What if Jesus had not prayed for the disciples (John 17:13ā19), for those who heard the gospel through them, and those who came after them, which includes us? He prayed āso that the world may believe that you sent meā (John 17:20ā21). What if he had not prayed for us and the unsaved of our day? Would lives have turned out differently? And if it does have an effect, how does it work?
Further confusing these issues is the teaching known as Calvinism. While I will explain these concepts in chapters 3 and 4, I mention them here preliminarily since they are relevant to this chapter and chapter 2.
Calvinism claims that God decreed (foreordained or predetermined) everything and gave man compatible moral freedom, meaning there is nothing man can do to change anything because God predetermined everything, and man cannot override that. This perspective raises the question, what possible difference can prayer make in what God has determined it to be, whether it was Paul beseeching the Ephesians to pray or Jesus praying for others? If Calvinism is true, then the truth is none of these prayers make a difference in the way things turn out, even though it seems that Jesus chose to pray, and Paul chose to implore the Ephesians to pray for the precise purpose of changing outcomes to be different than if they did not pray.
There is no indication that either Jesus or Paul understood their choice to pray as a determined event in which they could not have chosen otherwise. In an attempt to reconcile Scriptureās conditional statements with Calvinismās determinism, Calvinists often say prayer and the words prayed are a part of the process. But within Calvinism, whether one prays or not, including the very words prayed, the prayer and words are as determined as everything else, and any thought that a person could choose to act differently than he did is a delusion.
But Scripture portrays prayer undeniably differently. Scripture teaches that prayer, at least some of the time, results in different outcomes than if the person did not pray, and that the person chose to pray that specific prayer because he wanted a different outcome than the one happening or about to happen. He was not predetermined to pray, and he did not see the event he was praying about as determined. I believe a normal reading of Scripture, particularly the passages depicting human interaction with each other or with God, Godās promises, conditional statements, and prayer, along with much of the language employed, becomes nonsensical and even misleading if a person is consistent with Calvinismās belief that everything is decreed in unconditional election and compatible moral freedom. Calvinism, therefore, by its actual nature, reduces most of the normal language of Scripture depicting people making choices between accessible options with their comparable encouragements and warnings to utterly meaningless gibberish to maintain their view that God determines everything.
I believe there are accessible options in con...