Collaborative Public Diplomacy

How Transnational Networks Influenced American Studies in Europe

A. Fisher

• Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
• Year: 2013
• Print ISBN: 9780230338968
• eBook ISBN: 9781137042477
• Topic: Politics & International Relations
• Subtopic: European History
• Index: Politics & International Relations

Using archival research and recorded interviews, this book charts the development of American Studies in Europe during the early Cold War. It demonstrates how negotiations took place through a network of relationships and draws lessons for public diplomacy in an age when communities are connected through multi-hub, multi-directional networks.

N O T E S

Preface

1. Manuel Castells, The Rise of the Network Society, (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996).

2. M. Lewis, Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game, (New York: W. W. Norton, 2004).

3. Lewis, Moneyball, 147.

4. Lewis, Moneyball, 147.

5. See Pierre Pahlavi, “Evaluating Public Diplomacy Programmes,” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2, no. 3 (October 2007): 255–81; Louise Vinter and David Knox, “Measuring the Impact of Public Diplomacy: Can It Be Done?” Engagement: Public Diplomacy in a Globalised World (London: Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 2008), 166.

Introduction The Role of Networks in Public Diplomacy

1. G. Cowan and A. Arsenault, “Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy,” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616, no. 1 (March 1, 2008): 10–30.

2. For a history of network analysis, see John P. Scott, Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd ed. (London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2000).

3. Valdis Krebs, “Mapping Networks of Terrorist Cells,” Connections 24, no. 3 (2002): 43–52; Thomas W. Valente, Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications, 1st ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010); Everett M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995).

4. Thomas W. Valente, “The Diffusion Network Game,” Connections 19, no. 2 (1996): 30–37. Also see Franco Malerba and Nicholas S. Vonortas, Innovation Networks in Industries (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009).

5. Mark Granovetter, “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology 78, no. 6 (1973): 1360–1380.

6. Joel Levine, “The Sphere of Influence,” American Sociological Review 37, no. 1 (1972): 14–27.

7. Mark Gerzon, Global Citizens (London: Rider, 2010).

8. Ali Fisher, “Bullets with Butterfly Wings,” in Yahya R. Kamalipour (Ed.), Media, Power, and Politics in the Digital Age: The 2009 Presidential Election Uprising in Iran (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010).

9. R. Hill and R. Dunbar, “Social Network Size in Humans,” Human Nature 14, no. 1 (March 1, 2003): 53–72; W. X. Zhou, D. Sornette, R. A. Hill, and R. I. M. Dunbar, “Discrete Hierarchical Organization of Social Group Sizes,” Procee dings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272, no. 1561 (February 22, 2005): 439–44.

10. John F. Nash, “Two-Person Cooperative Games,” Econometrica 21, no. 1 (January 1, 1953): 128–40.

11. John F. Nash, “The Bargaining Problem,” Econometrica 18, no. 2 (1950): 155–62; John F. Nash, “Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36, no. 1 (January 1, 1950): 48–49.

12. R. B. Myerson, “Refinements of the Nash Equilibrium Concept,” International Journal of Game Theory 7 (June 1978): 73–80.

13. John F. Nash, “Non-Cooperative Games,” The Annals of Mathematics 54, no. 2, Second Series (1951): 286–95.

14. Thomas Schelling, “Arms and Influence,” in Thomas Mahnken and Joseph A. Maiolo (Eds.), Strategic Studies: A Reader, 1st ed. (London: Routledge, 2008).

15. Kathy Fitzpatrick, “U.S. Public Diplomacy in a Post-9/11 World: From Messaging to Mutuality,” CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy, Paper 6, October 2011.

16. Bureau of Public Affairs Department Of State, The Office of Electronic Infor mation, “21st Century Statecraft,” March 16, 2011, http://www.state.gov/statecraft/overview/index.htm; “Public Diplomacy in the Twenty-First Century [Rush Transcript; Federal News Service],” Council on Foreign Relations, n.d., http://www.cfr.org/diplomacy/public-diplomacy-twenty-first-century-rush-transcript -federal-news-service/p16698.

17. Luc Van den Brande, “Sub-Sta...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Title page
• Copyright
• Dedication
• Contents
• Preface
• Introduction   The Role of Networks in Public Diplomacy
• One   Navigating from the Salzburg Seminar to EAAS
• Two   Making an Exhibition of Yourself
• Three   Amerika Institut—Munich
• Four   The Founding of GAAS
• Five   The Founding of BAAS
• Conclusion   Building Blocks for a Collaborative Approach to Public Diplomacy
• Notes
• Index