An immigration system that forces people into the shadows of our society, or leaves them prey to criminals, is a system that needs to be changed. Iâm confident that we can changeâchange our immigration system in a way that secures our border, respects the rule of law, and, as importantly, upholds the decency of our country. (President George W. Bush speaking at the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast [White House April 7, 2006])
It is over a decade after President Bush delivered this speech, and the country may be even further apart on the issue of immigration than it was in 2006. Elected officials, party elites, a variety of interest groups, and the mass public appear to be more divided than ever. A careful reading of the Bush quotation indicates the difficulty of arriving at comprehensive immigration reform (CIR). Securing the border and respecting the rule of law conflict with âdecency,â removing immigrants from âthe shadowsâ and from the âprey to criminals.â Achieving immigration reform demands reaching an accommodation between the merciful treatment of immigrants and the legitimate demands of security, national sovereignty, and just and efficient governance. At this point, such an accommodation has not been reached.
The focus of our volume is on religion and its ties to the issue of immigration. This focus is a departure from the admonitions of many parents to their childrenâavoid talking and arguing about religion and politics, for the discussions and debates will lead to the loss of friends and end in a failure to convince people of your point of view. Despite the parental advice, as political scientists we are committed to examining politics in its various aspects and permutations. And in a country with such widespread religious involvement, even with the reported decline in religious affiliation (Cf. Pew 2014), the examination of the variety of associations between religion and immigration seems appropriate and even vital.
The specific focus of our volume is on a particular type or species of American religion, evangelicalism. Evangelicalism has been much in the news in recent years, with most of the attention given to its white constituents. Part of the reason for this is the size of white evangelicalism. Whites compose about half of the American population, and white evangelicals are the largest religious component of the white population. More important, however, than size is the realization that this group of Americans is by far the biggest contributor to Republican partisan identification and vote choice for GOP presidential candidates and has been for some time (Kellstedt and Guth 2018). Apart from scholarly research, the media have been filled with the 81% figureâthat is, the 81% of the white evangelical vote for Donald Trump reported in the exit polls from the 2016 election. This figure has been discussed and debated at such length that many Americans have come to associate the term âevangelicalâ with right-wing conservative politics and not with religious criteria at all.1 As we shall see, the association has some validity as white evangelicals have tended to support the Trump immigration initia...