This book examines Japanās foreign and security policy, especially under the Shinzo Abe government. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe came to power after his predecessor Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi stepped down in September 2006. Although Prime Minister Abe planned to enhance Japanās security policy and strengthen the JapanāUSA alliance in his first cabinet (September 2006āAugust 2007), he ended up resigning within a year. After the fall of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) government (September 2009āDecember 2012), Prime Minister Abe came back to power in December 2012. Since then his government has reinvigorated Japanās foreign and security policy in various ways. There are a number of books about Prime Minister Abe both in Japanese and in English. Much attention seems to be paid to the prime ministerās economic policy, also known as ā Abenomicsā, and most of the Japanese-language titles resulted in one-sided and overheated criticism of or applause for the prime minister.
Understandably, most Japanese economists tend to focus on the economic policy of the Abe administration,1 and international economists have also paid much attention to the prime ministerās economic initiative, namely Abenomics.2 On the contrary, political scientists have examined Japanese political system under the Abe government, such as the ā2012 political systemā being a new phase in Japanese politics,3 and the ā prime ministerial executiveā in comparison with the Westminster system.4 Meanwhile, Japanese political scientists have conducted a thorough review on the Abe government from multiple perspectives in an edited book.5 In particular, Seiji Endo of Seikei University has critically analyzed the foreign and security policy of the Abe administration under the policy of ā proactive contribution to peaceā.6 Endo pointed out that the Abe government intentionally did not utilize the term āpacifismā but chose the words ā proactive contribution to peaceā (sekkyokuteki heiwashugi), so that the government could promote both Japanās international cooperation and military normalization at the same time.7
More specifically, Kyoji Yanagisawa , the former Director of the National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS) , observed that the policy of the Abe administration under the concept of proactive contribution to peace coincides with Japanās military cooperation with the United States.8 In regard to Japanās military normalization through the enactment of the Peace and Security Legislation, Marta Ross described the strategic policy facilitated by Prime Minister Abe as the ā Abe restorationā, and observed that āit is not only an effort to restore Japanās confidence and pride, but is also an opportunity for Japan to demonstrate that it can exercise the responsible use of national power ā economic, political, and militaryā.9 Likewise, Craig Mark conducted a comprehensive analysis of the Abe administration at political, economic, and strategic levels, and also described the leadership of the prime minister as ā Abe restorationā.10
Another distinguished earlier study by Christopher Hughes investigated the foreign and security policy under the Abe government, including the issues of history problems, defense policy, and US bases in Okinawa , as well as the relationship with Asian neighbor countries; he described the policy as the āAbe Doctrine ā.11 In Japan, Akira Kato, Professor in International Politics at J. F. Oberlin University, critically examined this, arguing that the doctrine seeks to strengthen Japanās military capability in a way that is more than necessary.12 However, the term Abe Doctrine has not been commonly used by the Japanese people, and the prime minister himself has not defined his national security strategy in this way. Is the Abe Doctrine really identifiable in Japanese politics and international relations? If this is the case, what are the policy implications and components of the Abe Doctrine as Japanās new grand strategy? Will it be sustainable and widespread in Japanese politics?
Notably, less attention has been paid to the legal and political implications of the Peace and Security Legislation based on the policy of proactive contribution to peace during the Abe administration for Japanās foreign and security policy, especially Japanās Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system, the JapanāUSA alliance, and Japanās policy on international peacekeeping operations in South Sudan . Moreover, exploring the characteristics of Japanās security strategy under the Abe government and Japanās policy toward the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is important in order to comprehend the strategic nature of the Abe Doctrine . These case studies can be regarded as filling a research gap for the Abe administration.
In an attempt to answer the main questions and to fill in the research gap noted above, this book aims to investigate the policy implications of Prime Minister Abeās proactive contribution to peace (proactive pacifism) for Japanās foreign and security policy (domestic/national), the JapanāUSA alliance (bilateral/regional), and Japanās policy toward international peace operations (international/global). To this end, this book investigates Prime Minister Abeās policy-making process through the Peace and Security Legislation, which upgraded Japanās security policy and enabled Japan to exercise the right of collective self-defense, which used to be unconstitutional. The main argument of the book is that the domestic, bilateral, and global implications of the prime ministerās proactive contribution to peace concept are policy components of the Abe Doctrine as a new grand strategy.
Accordingly, this book will specifically explore the areas mentioned above: the policy implications of the Peace and Security Legislation for Japanās BMD system, the JapanāUSA alliance system, and Japanās policy on international peacekeeping operations in South Sudan . Finally, it seeks to reveal the emergence of the Abe Doctrine by anatomizing its policy elements of security strategy as well as the strategic implication of Japanās TPP policy. The significance of this lies in the fact that whereas earlier research examined the possible existence of the Abe Doctrine by analyzing its ideological elements, such as the prime ministerās attitude toward historical issues, official visits to the Yasukuni Shrine , and his foreign and security policy, this book identifies the domestic/bilateral/global implications of the proactive contribution to peace policy and the Peace and Security Legislation as a concrete example of the Abe Doctrine.13
Immediately after his return to power, Prime Minister...