Ugliness or unsightliness is much more than a quality or property of oneās appearance. In Western contexts and histories especially, ugliness has long functioned as a social category that demarcates oneās rights and access to social, cultural, and political spaces. People who are unsightly are framed as not only unworthy of being seen or of having eyes set upon them, but they then become the target of interventions to curb the possibility of their causing aversion and discomfort in others. For example, āugly lawsā or āunsightly beggar ordinances,ā which were widespread in the US, UK, and Europe by the late nineteenth century, functioned to formally exclude certain peopleās access from the public sphere on the basis that their bodies would pollute the public spaces because they were dirty, disabled, ādeformed,ā sickly, disgusting, or unsightly.1 Emerging in many cities in the US as a tool of the state, ugly laws have functioned at the nexus of ableism, classism, racism, and settler colonialismāprotecting wealthy, white, able-bodied, and hetero-domesticated settler subjects from the perceived aggressions of the exploited and exhausted impoverished working classes and other āburdensomeā subjects.2 Ugly laws, if nothing else, demonstrate the extent to which what we look like, that is, how we appear to one another but more specifically to those with the power to see, functions as a key determinant in what kind of life we can expect to live. Yet, as with ability, bodies are prone to change, to alter, and to move in and out of categories of ugliness, such that upholding investments in unsightliness ultimately functions against even the most privileged. In the words of Heather Laine Talley, āugliness matters for us all, but it particularly matters for those with bodies defined as ugly.ā3 Bodies are punished when they are deemed āugly,ā and this treatment is justified on account of their reduction to being an ugly thing, and thus, as NoĆ«l Carroll argues, ābeneath or outside ethics.ā4
On the Politics of Ugliness is a collection of engagements with ugliness as a politically invested site, one that flows in and out of dialogue with gender, ability, race, class, age, sexuality, health, and body size. The editors and authors of this collection refuse to accept that ugliness is solely the property of a body, space, or thing, and argue that ugliness is also a function leveraged to uphold notions of worth and entitlement. In identifying and locating ugliness as a political category, On the Politics of Ugliness strives to imagine new ways of seeing ugliness and of being and being seen as ugly by fighting against its categorization and use as a pejorative denomination of visual injustice.
Ugliness appears everywhere in our everyday lives and in scholarship on the body, beauty, culture, appearance, and representation. Yet, it is infrequently engaged with as a direct object of study. As this Introduction will explore, while mentions of ugliness have been abundant in philosophy, aesthetic and literary theory, feminist theory, critical race studies, art history, and critical disability studies, and while ugliness so clearly informs these many fields, it has been elaborated on in fairly limited terms. In philosophy and art history, ugliness is usually explored in terms of aesthetics, tending to erase from view its complex politics and its effects on atypical bodies. In such work, ugliness is also largely dependent on conceptualizations of beauty, while its social and relational aspects are obscured from view. Indeed, ugliness seems to emerge as a property or attribute of places and bodies rather than as a process that relies on an unjust distribution of value and power in relation to the workings of gender, ability, race, class, beauty norms, body size, health, sexuality, and age. This collection seeks to centralize ugliness as an object of study, exploring how ugliness operates in the perpetuation and justification of social, political, and visual injustice, and to consider what drives our social and academic fears of ugliness.
In this chapter, we open up this study of ugliness by exploring what it means and what is at stake when someone or something is marked with and by āugliness.ā We do this by considering contemporary deployments of ugliness, with a focus on Western socio-cultural contexts, as well as by providing a review of theoretical engagements with ugliness. We position ugliness politically, rather than purely aesthetically, tracing its intersections with discourses, practices, and institutions of power. To this end, we trace what it means to engage with a āpolitics of ugliness,ā through a survey of conceptualizations of ugliness in both academic literature and the social context, drawing out ugliness as a uniquely mobile category that is deployed not only to marginalize bodies but also to keep those bodies in their subjugated place.
In outlining the stakes of thinking with ugliness as well as providing an overview of the existing literature on ugliness, this chapter is organized according to the sections that comprise this collection. We begin by exploring ugliness as a form of visual injustice, focusing in particular on how ugliness affects relating and how spatio-temporalities are organized to expunge bodies deemed ugly. Following this, we explore the materialization of ugliness through and on bodies as well as in representations. Next, we consider ways in which ugliness has been imagined as a site to be desired, as a generative power. Throughout, we focus on literature that is adept at exploring the politics behind the operations of uglinessāthat is, work within the fields of feminist theory, critical disability studies, sexuality studies, cultural studies, postcolonial literatures, and critical race studies. Yet, we find that while many of these fields are, in intricate and surprising ways, cognizant of the politics of ugliness and how they map onto other categories, they have not meticulously engaged with ugliness as an object of analysis. This body of interdisciplinary work makes mention of ugliness only incidentally, such that it is more difficult to conduct a genealogy on the politics of ugliness than on the aesthetics of ugliness. It seems that theorists have a vested political interested in ugliness but that explicitly politicized analyses of ugliness are wanting. All the same, this work, as we will explore, speaks to the political valence of ugliness and its operation alongside identities and bodies, laying the groundwork for this collection. In what follows, we argue that it is important to position ugliness politically as a form of visual injustice, first tracing extant scholarly considerations of the intersection of ugliness with circuits of power and oppression, and then outlining how the pieces in this collection consider these intersections anew.
Visual Injustice: Relationality and the Spatio-Temporalities of Ugliness
Theoretical and scholarly work on ugliness has developed along two tracks. The first mostly de...