Artist-teacher-practice is a site-responsive way to return to the classroom, providing a way to move differently with and perceive anew its complex affective relations.
In bringing together the objects of artist-teacher practice with the classroom to ask what is revealed and given potential, this turn argues that it is necessary to see both as phenomena in movement, having a rhythm that one must be caught up in and carried along by in order to understand them. The turn has two moves. Move one describes the unique character of the classroom as formed by multiple movements of to and fro. Move two then considers how artist-teacher practice as a form of site-responsive inquiry may be a way to engage with and re-enliven the ârestlessnessâ inherent within the constant to and fro. Theoretical reflection is interspersed with descriptions of the four classrooms that I visited as part of this study.
Move 1: How movement creates the unique character of the classroom
Imagine a classroom.
From field notes at school with Julie and Catrin April 2017:
An art room to die for! One whole wall is floor to ceiling windows, with views across a tree lined street and the city centre beyond. From the car park below I could see three large MDF letters, A R T, leant against the windows for all to see - this is where the art room is! Everything looks new. White walls, white cupboards, white tables facing the front, at an angle, arranged in rows with a central aisle. Students (sitting on black metal stools with grey plastic seats) have a clear view of the white board centrally placed at the front of the room. Thereâs a desk at the front where Julie sits, completing the register on her laptop and using the visualiser (the projector is fixed to the ceiling) and a white plan chest in the corner behind for paper.
Three stainless steel sinks, all clean, sit within almost spotless white work surfaces, running along two sides of the room. A noticeboard at the back of the room displays homework (making colour wheels) and âknowledge organisersâ. Above the teacherâs desk, is a kind of washing line, where more work is pegged. The walls are fairly bare though various notices outline classroom behaviour expectations. Behind Julieâs desk are pinned A4 laminated sheets indicating the desired level of noise (âone at a timeâ or âsilent timeâ). There is no lesson now. Everywhere is quiet. When students arrive they line up silently outside the room - on the wall you can see the scuff marks that their bodies and belongings are starting to make, as they lean against it whilst waiting. I smell food from the canteen downstairs, a large white atrium, more like a minimalist contemporary art gallery cafe than a school cafeteria (until the students pour out of their classrooms, in their black blazers and white shirts). I hear a hand drier from the toilet across the corridor.
This art room is not a âtypicalâ one, but, arguably, there are no âtypicalâ classrooms, only particular ones. From a sociological perspective, Thomson and Hall caution that when asked to imagine âa schoolâ, âthe chances are we think generallyâ (2017, p. 7), but when asked to imagine âmy schoolâ, the focus is more likely to be on the peculiarities. Thomson describes this particularity as âthisnessâ, â⊠the specificity of place and how it is that local action is framed and limited by the flows of people, information and things, and by connections beyond the school gatesâ (2017, p. 21). She conjures a picture of the classroom in movement (students come and go, communities evolve), not simply a noun (a thing) but also a verb (a doing) â a happening in action, created by flows from both inside and outside its boundaries. Classrooms are not static, generic spaces, but unique, affective phenomena, with aesthetic qualities.
From field notes at school with Molly October 2018:
A really cold day, the school feels run down, decorated a while ago and needing refurbishment. The last OFSTED report was not favourable. This does not âlookâ like a âgoodâ school. The only art room on the first floor, originally twice the size, was divided to make a languages classroom. Language staff use the art room as a cut through, several do so whilst I am there. Windows on opposite sides of the room are so drafty that papier machĂ© sculptures hanging from the ceiling sway in the noticeable breeze. With my coat on Iâm cold. Outside are fields and hills in the distance. At the back is a battered work-surface with cupboards underneath. To the side is a row of tables, facing the wall - when older students sit there they appear overgrown, too big for the furniture. A large table in the middle catches my eye as I enter. Itâs an enticing âfeatureâ- black but worn, its surface flecked with colour. Thereâs a lot of clutter. Shelving is piled high with used canvases waiting for reuse and old grey plastic drawers (the deep ones) are stacked lower down containing various âpast their bestâ materials. Everything looks worn, and well-used. There is just enough space for a whole class to sit down. Molly has an old wooden desk at the front; on it she keeps a barbie doll in a box dressed as her âidealâ art teacher self, part of an activity from her teacher training. Through a door behind her desk is a separate work area, with facilities for screen printing, and a âclassâ of fist-sized clay heads arranged on tables and window sills, the sun catches them and they glow a bright terracotta. Here there is a fridge, a kettle, a toaster, a bread bin, a box of biscuits, a jar of jam and an âhonesty boxâ; a piece of paper stuck to the wall lists prices. Students come at break times, helping themselves to tea, coffee, toast and biscuits (choc-ices in the summer), staying in the room to work or chat. Judging by the number of students who try the door whilst we are talking this is a popular option. The teacher admits most do not pay.
Movement
Continuing with the notion that a classroom is âin movementâ, one can ask what has moved and is moving in order to create the differences between this art room and the one previously described. Many âmovementsâ or flows are events that sanction change: funding decisions, admissions policies etc. Other âmovementsâ are modest, the opening of a door or window, putting something out or putting things away, others still occur at a molecular level that we cannot see (Youdell & Armstrong 2011; Frost 2016), materials drying out or decaying, teachers and student bodies modulating temperature, emotions, blood pressure, digestion, hormones etc. Each movement is part of a series of movements, all connected to each other.
These movements generate phenomena, or entangled material agenciesâ, in Baradâs terms (2003, 2007, 2012, 2014). No thing comes into being independently without entanglement with other things. A classroom might be considered a fixed, pre-formed âthingâ, determined by the physical boundaries of floor, ceiling, walls, doors and windows, but if viewed in movement as a phenomenon, it becomes a complex milieu where a myriad of material and non-materialities intersect (Youdell and Armstrong 2011).
Thompson and Cook describe the classroom as âless a static locationâ (2014, p. 286) than a moment of interaction formed as close-by and far-away flows and intensities intersect. Classrooms are alive with close-by sensation, noise, smell, temperature and light, but are also propelled by distant, spatial and temporal flows: exam regulations, inspection frameworks, accountability measures, funding decisions and political trends. Thompson and Cook present a paradox: perpetual movement ensures that the classroom is continually remade anew, with different combinations of teacher, students, curriculum, policy, life events etc. so that every day is different, and yet, there is a predictable repetition of the same as lessons return time and again to familiar patterns of movement, day after day, term after term, year after year. Adopting from Deleuze and Guattari the idea of metallurgic return, a repetition of the same movement, they present teaching as an ongoing oscillation between returning possibilities. Offering a number of oscillations that hold in tension the close-by and the far-away, they suggest that âthe working to and fro between the oscillations of closeness and distance places teaching in constant fluxâ (2014, p. 287).
This flux is seen in the following description: a coastal school tarnished by far-away, out-of-reach standards, political and economic realities that have moved to frame the school as ârequiring improvementâ. These contrast with Bellaâs close-by interaction, the overwhelming superfluousness of resources she crams into every space, keeping all kinds of materials âjust in caseâ a particular student might develop work for which only that material might do.
From field notes at school with Bella November 2018:
An early academy, one of the first âBuilding Schools for the Futureâ builds, a huge contemporary building looming over the white cottages of the seaside town. Artist Elena, teacher Bella and I enter through the lobby where 3D art displays are positioned on high up ledges (now out of reach for anyone to change - the school has no scaffold tower high enough for working safely at that height). It is Saturday, the building is eerily quiet. We use the lift. The building is painted grey and green. Itâs sunny, but I wonder how the greyness feels on a really grey day. We walk along endless wide corridors before reaching the art room. First impressions: the room is large but (Bella did warn me) crammed with stuff. The architecture is industrial, walls of breeze blocks, exposed pipes and steel girders. Windows, set high up, run along one whole wall, overlooking a parallel corridor where the staff room and another classroom are - above that a slither of sky. There is no view unless you stand against the windows and look right. Under the windows is a work surface crammed with bags of materials and studentsâ work in progress. At the front is a whiteboard (projector on ceiling) ...