Part 1
SETTING THE SCENE
1.1
Mission and Proselytism
Themes and Issues
John Baxter-Brown
Evangelism is the queen of all Christian ministries. It is the one dedicated to making the Triune Godâs Good News known to all the world through the words, deeds and character of Godâs people. It is an outward-looking ministry, facing into the world that is loved by God and yet wounded and broken by sin.
The Churchâs very existence is both a result of evangelism and Godâs chosen tool for evangelism. She is called to be salt and light in the world if she is to be faithful to her calling of love and obedience towards God. There is an urgency and necessity for the Church to embrace her responsibility before God such that the whole world is invited to participate in the life and love of God.
Throughout Christian history, the Church has endeavored to find how best to be faithful to her calling to mission and evangelism. Not always has she been successful and too often even the best of intentions led to hurt and pain, and caused disrepute to the gospel. In the twentieth century there were many expressions of concern and growth in the ways the Christian traditions thought about mission. In 1910 was the famous Edinburgh World Missions Conference. It produced two âmessagesâ calling the Church to mission and evangelism, as well as leading to the founding of the International Missionary Council (IMC, now known as CWME, and part of the World Council of Churches). The Anglican Church produced a report on âthe Evangelistic work of the Churchâ in 1919. There followed a series of IMC world missionary conferences; the rise of the Pentecostal and charismatic movements; the formation of the Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization (now called the Lausanne Movement); Papal encyclicals and other documents, and in 2016, the Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church produced The Mission of the Orthodox Church in Todayâs World. During the twentieth century, there was a rapid demographic shift in world Christianity, from the North Atlantic (Europe and North America) to the developing countries of the majority world.
And yet . . . even âwhile leadership of all participant bodies [of the Global Christian Forum] agree that the church is called to mission and evangelism, powerful emotions and deep wounds rooted in experiences, perceptions, or accusations of proselytism between churchesâunderstood popularly as the âstealing of sheepâ from one Christian body by another Christian bodyâare widely manifest.â
This book, which is primarily concerned with proselytism from a theological perspective, is itself part of the initiative of the Four Pillars of the GCF to explore the issue of proselytism. It is a multi-layered issue within the global Christian community, with complex inter-connecting themes which can play out differently in varying contexts. However, the subject is of significant interest beyond the boundaries of the Christian community as it raises legal, ethical, and political concerns as well as theological and methodological ones. Thus, both Christian and secular bodies have addressed the issue from within their areas of competence. For example, this book includes an edited version of a long article from the Emory International Law Review, as well as theological and ethical reflections drawn from the main Christian traditions.
The legal and political intersection
There are several reasons why the intersection with law and politics is important.
Firstly, and most obviously, we all live in societies that are governed by law (however it is formulated and administered). As such governments have the power to shape and change the cultural and legal framework of their societies (for good or ill), and this includes creating, defining and imposing boundaries around the religious life of its citizens. Thus, when governments enact such legislation, or act in such a way as to enforce policies on religious practice, there will usually be direct implications for adherents of religion. These may be beneficialâor detrimental.
Secondly, religious belief and behaviour are often closely associated with national and cultural identity. National Churches, for example, can be custodians of national culture (to varying degrees). The national Churches from the former Soviet-bloc countries of Eastern Europe and the Middle East, subjected to many years of oppressive, foreign rule, make this claim with some justification. The religious tradition, as cultural guardian, may therefore be deeply valued and the boundaries between religious and cultural institution may be difficult to define. Changing oneâs religious affiliation and loyalty can be perceived as a denunciation of oneâs national citizenship. This is a sociological aspect, but intersects with the legal one as well.
Thirdly, human rights, especially those rights connected to religious freedoms and expressions, create an international framework in which the issue of proselytism comes into sharp focus. For example, Stahnke notes that âall major international human rights documents recognize the right to freedom of religion, which includes not only the freedom to hold religious beliefs but also the freedom to manifest those beliefs.â However, âwhile the freedom to hold beliefs is considered to be absolute, i.e., not subject to limitation by the State, the freedom to manifest beliefs is subject to valid limitations.â The State, therefore, can impose restrictions upon the practice of faith which is especially relevant when so-called âanti-conversionâ laws are applied. In theory, the development of national legal frameworks should protect the rights all interested parties; in practice, it is questionable if this is achieved.
Fourthly, and closely connected to the previous point, there are competing ârightsâ within the issue of proselytism. Variables exist within this ârightsâ context. Stahnke expresses it well: âThe problem l...