All of these manifestations of global environmental change in oceans and seas, and indeed many other manifestations that are not mentioned here, present new challenges for governing the marine environment. Marine environmental governance can be broadly conceived of as marine policies and actions that prevent or limit adverse environmental outcomes and promote desirable ones (cf. Delmas and Young 2009: 6). Governance has always been difficult in the marine environment (see, e.g., Grip 2017), but global environmental change adds new layers of difficulty that cannot be ignored. This is especially true with respect to the most profound of all types of global environmental change: climate change. As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has observed, âImpacts of climate-related changes in the ocean ⌠increasingly challenge current governance efforts to develop and implement adaptation responses from local to global scales, and in some cases pushing them to their limitsâ (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2019: 29). Consequently, it is imperative to strengthen those and other governance efforts that are directly and indirectly related to the worldâs oceans and seas. How have governments, communities and other actors concerned about the marine environment responded to global environmental changes? How will, and how should, they do so in the future? The contributors to this book aim to answer these and many related questions. Their chapters are organised into sections that respectively focus on marine environmental governance with respect to (a) international law, regimes, and institutions (Part 2 of the book); (b) non-state actors (Part 3); (c) particular environments and regions (Part 4); and (d) emerging issues (Part 5). The following subsections highlight some of the ideas presented in each chapter.
International law, regimes, and leadership in marine environmental governance
The substantive chapters begin in Part 2 of the book, which focuses on international law, regimes, and institutions in marine governance amidst global environmental change. In Chapter 2, Erik van Doorn provides a foundation for most subsequent chapters with a detailed description of the law of the sea. He argues that marine governance is very largely premised on the law of the sea, which evolved through centuries to become customary international law. The importance of clarifying the law of the sea and adapting it to modern needs resulted in negotiation and agreement of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Combined with existing practices, UNCLOS has subsequently affected the use of oceans and seas as the Anthropocene has become more evident there. The question is whether UNCLOS and the law of the sea more broadly are up to the task as global environmental changes become more intense, more widespread, and more influential in the marine environment. The likely outcome for marine environmental governance may be a combination of creative interpretation of existing law and creation of new formal and informal (âsoftâ) law agreements and the evolution of practices by states, all of which are taken up in greater detail in several other chapters in this book.
One of the big challenges for marine environmental governance amidst global environmental change is the imperfect fit between regimes developed for ocean management and those created to manage global climate change. The nexus between these two regimes â or, more accurately, sets of regimes â is taken up by Rozemarijn J. Roland Holst in Chapter 3. Holst points out that, despite the many connections between oceans and climate â the bulk of carbon pollution and indeed heat from global warming have been absorbed by the oceans, for example â oceans and seas were, at least until very recently, largely absent from international negotiations on combatting climate change. Where oceans have found their way into international efforts to address climate change are in countriesâ so-called Nationally Determined Contributions â their action pledges â to the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change. While the oceans regime is adaptive enough to incorporate considerations of climate change, Holst argues that cumulative impacts of climate change expose the weaknesses of approaching the management of different forms of ocean pollution independently. To be sure, there are opportunities to overcome this sectoral approach within both the oceans and climate regimes, but coordination is still lacking. Neither regime is up to the task of effectively managing ocean challenges exacerbated by climate change, so âpurposeful coordinationâ will become increasingly necessary and urgent.
By focusing on the problem of ocean acidification, in Chapter 4, Jennicca Gordon further explicates the important relations between the oceans and climate regimes, in the process especially highlighting the legal connections. Due to emissions of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels, changes in ocean chemistry are occurring at an accelerating rate. In particular, as the oceans absorb that carbon, they become acidic; today, they are almost one-third more acidic than 200 years ago. Impacts on marine organisms and ecosystems are increasingly apparent, ranging from adverse effects on plankton to reductions in shellfish harvests. Gordon argues that ocean acidification is creating specific new challenges for international law. While extant multilateral environmental agreements can serve as the basis for marine governance in this context, it is still unclear which should take the lead and what kind of new rules will need to be agreed upon to do so effectively. An obvious problem is that the cause of this problem â carbon emissions governed by the climate change regime â and the impacts â acidification of oceans and seas â are the subjects of different regimes. Gordon draws on the experience of the Convention on Biological Diversity to suggest avenues for strengthening the oceans and climate regimes so that they can more effectively respond to acidification. Connections across all three regimes â oceans, climate, and biodiversity â point to avenues for more effective marine governance of this aspect of global environmental change.
Marine governance will be conceived by some people as addressing the management challenges of the worldâs great oceans, but often it is about regional seas with proximity to large human populations. The latter are the objects of analysis in Chapter 5, by Luciana Fernandes Coelho and Nata Tavonvunchai. Coelho and Tavonvunchai maintain that regional seas programmes â formalised agreements among littoral states, often under the auspices of the United Nations or other international organisations â are important regimes for ocean governance at the regional level. In particular, in addition to their normal focus on addressing traditional forms of ocean pollution, regional seas programmes provide opportunities for storing carbon within marine habitats. They can do this by shifting focus towards ecosystem-based management of marine environments, in the process protecting those habitats, such as seagrass beds and mangroves, which absorb and retain on the order of one-half of all carbon stored in marine (including coastal) ecosystems. Coelho and Tavonvunchai argue that preserving these âblue carbonâ ecosystems can contribute to the management objectives of both the oceans and climate regimes. A number of regional seas programmes have adopted ecosystem-based management schemes, the most prominent examples being marine protected areas and integrated coastal zone management. These schemes have the effect of promoting blue carbon storage without necessarily trying to do so specifically. This implies that more conscious efforts to protect, and eventually enlarge, blue carbon ecosystems would result in both more effective marine governance amidst climate change and more effective governance of the climate change problem itself, thanks to regional seas.
Adding to Coelho and Tavonvunchaiâs analysis of blue carbon and regional seas programmes, in Chapter 6, Gabriela A. Oanta explores the marine (âblueâ) dimensions of the European Unionâs (EU) European Green Deal, a nearly continent-wide initiative to realise environmental sustainability in general and carbon neutrality in particular. Towards that end, the European Green Deal has implied and explicit marine components â implied because maritime considerations matter for the programmeâs wider objectives and explicit because it includes specific maritime sectoral policies and the unionâs Integrated Maritime Policy. Oanta argues that the European Green Deal should be developed in ways that comport with the EUâs policies that affect oceans and seas. In particular, she calls for policies and laws that move the union beyond its established Integrated Maritime Policy towards achieving coordinated climate-related objectives through the European Green Deal, the European Climate Law, and promotion of the broader blue economy.
Whether efforts to address the marine challenges of global environmental change are likely to be successful will, to a substantial extent, be a function of leadership by actors and institutions. Their strategies for leadership are examined in Chapter 7 by MaĹgorzata Zachara-SzymaĹska. Zachara-SzymaĹska defines leadership in terms of multilevel activity directed towards building capacities to act. She argues that leadership is central to marine environmental governance in identifying problems and building trust among actors that, without that leadership, might face difficulties in working collectively. Leadership, or the lack of it, can be exercised by individuals, such as national leaders, corporate executives, and activists, with roles in the regimes and institutions that formulate and implement marine environmental governance. Through their leadership, they can promote new rules and measures for action, build trust among the entities that must carry out action, and address fragmentation among those entities. Zachara-SzymaĹska explores several dimensions of leadership: structural leadership among states and international organisations, which is often premised on the distribution of material power; cognitive leadership, which is focused on how knowledge is created, distributed and transformed, in the process affecting conceptual frameworks that guide or at least affect policies; and relational leadership, a dimension that highlights the important interactions among actors that are central to whether marine environmental governance will be effective.