The Theatre of Death

Rituals of Justice from the English Civil Wars to the Restoration

P J Klemp

• Publisher: University of Delaware Press
• Year: 2016
• Print ISBN:
  9781644530313
  9781644530306
• eBook ISBN:
  9781644530320
• Topic: Literature
• Subtopic: English Literary Criticism
• Index: Literature

This book discusses some rituals of justice—such as public executions, printed responses to the Archbishop of Canterbury's execution speech, and King Charles I's treason trial—in early modern England. Focusing on the ways in which genres shape these events' multiple voices, I analyze the rituals' genres and the diverse perspectives from which we must understand them.

The execution ritual, like such cultural forms as plays and films, is a collaborative production that can be understood only, and only incompletely, by being alert to the presence of its many participants and their contributions. Each of these participants brings a voice to the execution ritual, whether it is the judge and jury or the victim, executioner, sheriff and other authorities, spiritual counselors, printer, or spectators and readers. And each has at least one role to play. No matter how powerful some institutions and individuals may appear, none has a monopoly over authority and how the events take shape on and beyond the scaffold. The centerpiece of the mid-seventeenth-century's theatre of death was the condemned man's last dying utterance. This study focuses on the words and contexts of many of those final speeches, including King Charles I's (1649), Archbishop William Laud's (1645), and the Earl of Strafford's (1641), as well as those of less well known royalists and regicides. Where we situate ourselves to view, hear, and comprehend a public execution—through specific participants' eyes, ears, and minds or accounts—shapes our interpretation of the ritual. It is impossible to achieve a singular, carefully indoctrinated meaning of an event as complex as a state-sponsored public execution.

Along with the variety of voices and meanings, the nature and purpose of the rituals of justice maintain a significant amount of consistency in a number of eras and cultural contexts. Whether the focus is on the trial and execution of the Marian martyrs, English royalists in the 1640s and 1650s, or the Restoration's regicides, the events draw on a set of cultural expectations or conventions. Because rituals of justice are shaped by diverse voices and agendas, with the participants' scripts and counterscripts converging and colliding, they are dramatic moments conveying profound meanings.

Published by University of Delaware Press. Distributed worldwide by Rutgers University Press.
 

Table of contents

• Title Page
• List of Figures
• Preface
• Acknowledgments
• Introduction
• “I have been bred upon the Theater of death, and have learned that part”
• The Earl of Strafford’s Trial and Scaffold Speech
• The Earl of Strafford’s Trial and Scaffold Speech
• Archbishop William Laud in the Theatre of Execution
• Civil War Politics and the Texts of Archbishop William Laud’s Execution Sermon and Prayers
• Genre Criticism and the Animadversions upon Archbishop William Laud’s Execution Sermon and Prayers
• Self-Referential Defense Strategies in King Charles I’s Treason Trial
• The Earl of Strafford, Archbishop Laud, and King Charles I’s Deflation of Genre in His Speech Made upon the Scaffold
• “The Last Actors in This Bloody Tragedy”
• Afterword
• Works Cited
• Index
• About the Author