
- 384 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
About this book
In this annual review from the Cato Institute, leading legal scholars analyze the 2021-2022 Supreme Court term, specifically the most important and far-reaching cases of the year, plus cases coming up. Now in its 21st edition, the Cato Supreme Court Review is the first scholarly journal to appear after the term's end and the only one grounded in the nation's first principles, liberty, and limited government. Topics in the 2021-2022 edition include: vaccine mandates ( National Federation of Independent Business v. OSHA and Biden v. Missouri ), guns ( New York State Rifle Association v. Bruen ), drugs ( Ruan v. United States ), free speech ( Austin v. Reagan National Advertising ), abortion ( Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ), school choice ( Carson v. Makin ), state secrets ( United States v. Zubaydah and FBI v. Fazaga ), and much more.
Frequently asked questions
- Essential is ideal for learners and professionals who enjoy exploring a wide range of subjects. Access the Essential Library with 800,000+ trusted titles and best-sellers across business, personal growth, and the humanities. Includes unlimited reading time and Standard Read Aloud voice.
- Complete: Perfect for advanced learners and researchers needing full, unrestricted access. Unlock 1.4M+ books across hundreds of subjects, including academic and specialized titles. The Complete Plan also includes advanced features like Premium Read Aloud and Research Assistant.
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app.
Information
Table of contents
- FOREWORD
- INTRODUCTION
- The Court of Mass Incarceration
- West Virginia v. EPA: Some Answers about Major Questions
- A Major Question of Power: The Vaccine Mandate Cases and the Limits of Executive Authority
- The Becerra Cases: How Not to Do Chevron
- Egbert v. Boule: Federal Officer Suits by Common Law
- The Content-Discrimination Two-Step Post-Reed and Austin
- Using My Religion: Carson v. Makin and the Status/Use (Non)Distinction
- The State Secrets Sidestep: Zubaydah and Fazaga Offer Little Guidance on Core Questions of Accountability
- Vindicating Cassandra: A Comment on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
- Ruan v. United States: “Bad Doctors,” Bad Law, and the Promise of Decriminalizing Medical Care
- Restoring the Right to Bear Arms: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen
- Looking Ahead: October Term 2022
- CONTRIBUTORS