1
Hollywoodâs Whitest
Tonight we celebrate Hollywoodâs best and whitest, sorry . . . brightest.
âNeil Patrick Harris
Oscar host Neil Patrick Harris satirized the Academyâs all-white acting nominations in 2015.1 The following year, Oscar host Chris Rock dubbed the Academy Awards as âthe White Peopleâs Choice Awards.â2 However, Hollywoodâs white dominance is not a joke. From media ownership down to the average working actor, whites saturate the ranks. Whites are 62.6 percent of the US population but make up between 74 and 96 percent of Hollywood personnelâfrom professional actors to decision makers responsible for creative and casting choices.3 White male decision makers fund projects by white men, who tend to tell stories with white male leads.4 Nearly all of the 2016 best picture Oscar nominees told stories of white men triumphing over enormous odds.5 By making white men the center of nearly every narrative, Hollywood films and television shows naturalize their positions of power in every institution.
Hollywoodâs stories, though fictional, transmit real ideologies. When film and television privilege white stories over other stories, they reinforce a racial hierarchy that devalues people of color. Not only do dramatic racial disparities indicate employment discrimination in Hollywood, the underrepresentation of people of color in film and television can also have wider societal consequences. Since the media landscape can blur reality and fiction for viewers, the erasure of actors of color on screen can skew real-life perceptions. When audiences never see actors of color in major roles, they are less likely to perceive them as on equal footing with whites. Inversely, when whites and their stories are celebrated more than their fair share, audiences begin to associate significance, admiration, and power with that group over others.
Hollywoodâs biased employment practices have contributed to the dominance of whites across its ranks. For instance, Hollywoodâs union admission policiesâpast and presentâhave perpetuated a predominantly white workforce. Historically, nepotism reigned supreme in Hollywood, allowing only relatives of existing members (the majority of whom were white) into its unions.6 Today, unions such as the Directors Guild of America (DGA) and the Producers Guild of America (PGA) still require member endorsements and sponsorship.7 This inevitably leads to racial insularity because white Americans have social networks that are 91 percent white.8 As a result, Hollywoodâs unions remain primarily populated by white people, who recommend or refer their white friends and family. Furthermore, creative industries like Hollywood rely on social networks, resulting in a majority-white hiring pool. Even if whites in the industry do not consciously bar people of color, union policies and social networks effectively do so. To better understand the scope of white dominance in Hollywood, I examine racial disparities, both in front of and behind the camera.
PROFESSIONAL ACTORS
In 1977, the US Commission on Civil Rights released Window Dressing on the Set: Women and Minorities in Television, the first report on network televisionâs racial and gender exclusionary practices and stereotyped portrayals.9 Little has changed in the almost four decades since this report. While people of color made up 37.4 percent of the US population in 2013, actors of color were significantly underrepresented in film and television (see fig. 2). Even in 2015, regular actors of color on broadcast prime-time television lagged 9.2 percentage points behind the corresponding US populationâs percentage.10
Actors of color fare worse in lead roles. In 2013, actors of color occupied fewer than one-fifth of cable television and film leads, and fewer than one-tenth of broadcast television leads (see fig. 2). In 2014, the number of leads of color remained low, dipping even further in cable television and film.11 Coveted lead roles typically speak the most lines, have the longest time on screen, and display the most emotional depth and complexity. Audiences are most likely to identify with leads in film and television. Given the importance of lead roles, the overrepresentation of white actors as lead characters not only gives them a professional advantage but also constructs a narrative of white supremacy.
Figure 2. Actorsâ share of roles by type and race (2013)
Sources: US population (2014 estimate): US Census, âState and County Quickfacts,â http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html; âFilm (Speaking)â (2013): Smith, Choueiti, and Pieper, âRace/Ethnicity in 600 Popular Films: Examining on Screen Portrayals and Behind the Camera Diversityâ; âFilm Leadsâ (2011â2013), âBroadcast TV Leadsâ (2012â2013), and âCable TV Leadsâ (2012â2013): Darnell Hunt and Ana-Christina Ramon, â2015 Hollywood Diversity Report: Flipping the Scriptâ (Los Angeles: Ralph J. Bunche Center for African American Studies at UCLA, 2015).
African American Actors
Compared with other groups of color, African Americans have been more visible in US popular culture. The black/white binary is fundamental to how the Americans conceptualize race and race relations given the complex racial history of the United States.12 Consequently, since The Birth of a Nation (1915), African Americans have âfigured prominently in Hollywoodâs racist symbolic relationsâ because of their âunique history of material and cultural oppression as well as their rich expressive resources.â13 African American actors have had more opportunities than any other nonwhite group to make the âUlmer Hot List,â a ranking list of top A-list actors.14 The visibility of African Americans is reflected in their role sharesâoften at or above their 2013 percentage in the US population (see fig. 3). African Americans occupied 14 percent of both film and cable television roles in 2013. Though African Americans fell below their population percentage in the 2013â2014 television season, accounting for 10 percent of broadcast regulars, their numbers rose to 14 percent in the 2014â2015 season.15
Despite having a greater presence, African American actors still face limitations. A significant number of film and television shows have no black characters.16 In 2013, the percentage of African Americans in more than half of the top-grossing films was smaller than in the US population, while nearly a fifth of these films had no African American characters at all.17 Similarly, 16 percentâ37 percent of all cinematic, television, or streaming stories in 2014â2015 failed to portray a single speaking or named African American on screen.18 Many African American actors find roles in all-black films and television shows, which typically have lower budgets and limited distribution.19 Consequently, upon closer examination, even when African American actors reach population parity, they do not enjoy the same breadth of representation as white actors.
Figure 3. African American shares of roles by type (2013)
Sources: US Population (2014 estimate): US Census, âState and County Quickfacts,â http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html; âFilm (Speaking)â (2013): Smith, Choueiti, and Pieper, âRace/Ethnicity in 600 Popular Films: Examining on Screen Portrayals and Behind the Camera Diversityâ; âCable TVâ and âBroadcast TVâ (2012â2013): Darnell Hunt and Ana-Christina Ramon, â2015 Hollywood Diversity Report: Flipping the Scriptâ (Los Angeles: Ralph J. Bunche Center for African American Studies at UCLA, 2015).
Lead roles also remain elusive for African American actors. Chris Rock wrote, âWhen it comes to casting, Hollywood pretty much decides to cast a black guy or they donât. Weâre never on the âshort list.â Weâre never âin the mix.ââ20 Similarly, Will, a black male actor in his late twenties, told me about his limited opportunities compared with those of a white male actor friend:
I have a friend. . . . We moved to New York together . . . good-looking white guy, leading man. His opportunities and my opportunities are so different. This guy gets so many opportunities, and theyâre leads. Theyâre big, big leading things, so much that at the busy times of the year, he canât go in on everything. He gets so many opportunities that heâs tripping over them, while Iâm going in for three lines.
African American female actors experience even fewer quality lead roles because of a combination of racial and gender limitations. Hollywood is less likely to cast an African American woman opposite an African American man because the industry operates according to the myth that international audiences will not see films with black couples.21 For example, Hitch (2005) intentionally cast Latina actor Eva Mendes opposite African American actor Will Smith instead of an African American woman.22 Prior to Scandalâs premiere in 2012 on ABC, a black woman had not led a network television drama in nearly forty years.23 Viola Davis described black female actors as having only âtwo or three categories,â compared with white female actors, who have different roles for every age category.24 Beating the odds, Viola Davis became the first African American female actor to win an âoutstanding lead actress in a dramatic seriesâ Emmy in 2015. Taraji P. Henson won the 2016 Golden Globe Award for the best actress in a television drama, the third African American female actor to do so in seventy-three years. Though African American actors still lag behind white actors in opportunities, they have made tremendous strides toward greater representation and recognition.
Latina/o Actors
Compared with other groups of color, Latina/o actors have the biggest disparity between their on-screen presence and US population percentage. Despite being the largest nonwhite group in the United States (17 percent of the population), Latinas/os were severely underrepresented in film and television in 2013. Specifically, Latinas/os represented only 5 percent of film speaking roles, 3 percent of cable television regulars, and 2 percent of broadcast television regulars (see fig. 4). Latinas/os were underrepresented by a factor of more than eight to one in broadcast television. In 2014â2015, Latinas/os played only 5.8 percent of all speaking/named characters in film, TV, and streaming services.25 Chris Rock wrote, âBut forget whether Hollywood is black enough. A better question is: Is Hollywood Mexican enough? Youâre in L.A, youâve got to try not to hire Mexicans.â26 Latinas/os make up 48.3 percent of Los Angeles County.27 Blanca Valdez, who runs a Latina/o casting agency in Los Angeles, said that Latinas/os have a difficult time auditioning for roles unless the call specifically asks for âdiversityâ or âmultiethnicâ; in any case, most are secondary roles, such as a neighbor or a bank teller.28
US film and television have rarely cast Latina/o actors in lead roles. In 2013, no Latinas/os starred as leads in the top ten movies or network television shows.29 In 2014, only 2.7 percent of lead roles in films went to Latinas/os.30 Just two US broadcast television shows in the 2014â2015 season starred Latinas: Jane the Virgin and Cristela. Cristela was cancelled after just one season. In 2015, Gina Rodriguez became only the second Latina actor to win a lead actress Golden Globe Award when she won for Jane the Virgin. In her acceptance speech, Rodriguez said her win ârepresents a culture that wants to see themselves as heroes.â31 Even with Rodriguezâs win, Latinas/os remain the lowest represented racial group compared with their percentage in the population.
Figure 4. Latina/o shares of roles by type (2013)
Sources: US Population (2014 estimate): US Census, âState and County Quickfacts,â http://q...