PART I
Overview of Italian Economy and Governance Model
CHAPTER 1
Italian Economy and Governance Model from a Global Perspective
A Historical Overview of the Italian Economy
Before the 20th century, the Italian economic system was mainly rural and the industrialization process was limited to the North of the country and to some industries (above all the mechanical and the textile). At the beginning of the 20th century, Italian economy joins the second industrial revolution, thanks to the important role played by the State that controls a number of companies operating in key industries such as public utilities, steel, insurance, and banking. In the first decades of the 20th century, two subjects, that is state-owned companies and large universal banks (e.g., Banca Commerciale Italiana, Credito Italiano, and Banco di Roma), dominate the national economic system as they finance the investment and the growth of companies operating in the capital-intensive industries such as public utilities (energy, telecommunication, etc.), steel, and mining.
The roots of Italian capitalism as it is nowadays are to be found in the Italian Stateâs reaction to the Great Crisis of 1929. The negative economic consequences affect first the industrial companies, and then the large universal banks that control them. The three main Italian universal banks collapsed due to the financial distress of their controlled companies. It emerged that an important part of nonfinancial firms was run by âmere executives using money provided almost entirely by the depositors of the commercial banksâ (Saraceno 1955: 198). Since the banksâ losses were eventually covered by the State, such a situation created moral hazard.
In 1933, to avoid potential terrible consequences for the entire national economy, the Italian Government creates a holding company (called IRI or Istituto per la Ricostruzione Industriale), which buys universal banksâ shareholdings in industrial companies. IRIâs board of directors was fully under the control of the Italian Government (Saraceno 1955). At the end of this massive reallocation of shares, the IRI group becomes the controlling shareholder of a large number of Italian companies and banks.
A second effect of the Great Crisis, following the evolution of the U.S. legislation (in particular, the 1933 GlassâSteagall Act), was the issue of a new banking law in 1936. This law prohibited âuniversalâ banks. Banks were not allowed to hold equity stakes in nonfinancial firms in order to avoid the possibility that the instability of industrial companies could have serious economic consequences on the financial industry (Amatori and Colli 2001). Since then, banks have generally preferred an armâs-length relationship with their customers rather than relational financing. This picture of bank behavior has one notable exception, Mediobanca (see Box 1.1).
The State intervention in the economy through the IRI group, originally intended as temporary, becomes permanent in 1937, characterizing the Italian capitalism as a âmixed economyâ (Barca and Trento 1997b). Since then, the State dominates the national economy through some large industrial business groups such as IRI, controlling a number of large companies operating in different industries and the largest banks in the country, ENI (Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi), controlling companies in the oil industry, EFIM (Ente Partecipazioni e Finanziamento Industrie Manifatturiere), controlling companies in the mechanical sector, and ENEL (Ente Nazionale per lâEnergia Elettrica) producing and distributing electricity in the country.
Besides the State, also some large private groups controlled by wealthy entrepreneurial families promoted the growth of the national economic system. Some business groups are relatively old and have been founded between the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century. They are Fiat group (Agnelli family), Pirelli group (Pirelli family), Italcementi group (Pesenti family), SMI (SocietĂ Metallurgica Italiana) group (Orlando family), and Acciaierie e Ferriere Lombarde Falck group (Falck family). These long-lasting groups are typically localized in the north of the country and are controlled by wealthy families of entrepreneurs who are strictly connected by personal relationships, mutual shareholdings, and syndicate pacts. For their characteristics, they have been called the galaxy of the North (galassia del nord) of the Italian capitalism. In the long period of growth of the national economy that follows the Second World War, also known as the Italian economic miracle (miracolo economico), new families entered into the scene. They founded and developed important business groups such as Ferrero, Benetton, De Benedetti, and Fininvest of Silvio Berlusconi.
Box 1.1 The History of Mediobanca: The âHubâ of Italian Capitalism
Founded in 1946 under the initiative of Raffaele Mattioli, the chairman of the Banca Commerciale Italiana, and Enrico Cuccia, Mediobanca offered a wide set of activities to its industrial and financial customers, including the placement of their bonds and shares and the advice on strategic and financial issues.
Mediobanca was formally controlled by some of the largest banks in Italy (Banca commerciale, Credito Italiano, and Banco di Roma), but de facto independent and under the strong leadership of its chief executive officer (CEO), Mr. Enrico Cuccia, who exercised his power until his death in 2000.
Not only did Mediobanca act as a merchant bank, but also played an important role in corporate governance, being able to influence CEO turnover of nonfinancial listed firms. This role was not justified by the relatively small proportion of shares directly held by Mediobanca in Italian nonfinancial listed firms, but by the fact that Mediobanca was the âhubâ of the main cross-shareholding network (including shareholdersâ agreements) among the most important industrial groups in Italy.
Sources: Barca and Trento (1997a); Aganin and Volpin (2005); Colli (2009); Zattoni and Cuomo (2016).
After the Second World War, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) have significantly increased their importance within the national 6 A PrIMEr oN CorPorAtE GoVErNANCE economy. These companies are usually controlled by an entrepreneur or a family and operate in small industries or niches of large industries. The most competitive Italian SMEs are usually diffused within limited geographical areas (the so-called industrial districts) where there is a high density of companies operating in a strictly related cluster of industries (Porter 1990). So, for example in Sassuolo, where there is the district of the ceramic tile production, it is possible to find not only the most competitive producers of ceramic tiles, but also the most sophisticated suppliers of goods and service related to the production of ceramic tiles.
Finally, the Italian economic system is also characterized by a large number of cooperativesâthat is, worker cooperatives, consumer cooperatives, social cooperatives, or consortiumsâoperating in several businesses (e.g., services, agriculture, retail, manufacturing, construction, and banking). The large number of cooperativesâthere are something less than 80,000 cooperatives employing about 1.3 million workers in Italyâhas been favored by both cultural and political values and the presence of tax incentives (Zattoni 2015). While some cooperatives are small and play a limited role in their industry, other cooperatives are large and play a leading role at national or international level. Think, for example, of Coop Italia in the domestic retail business, Sacmi in the global production of machineries for ceramic tiles, or CMC in the national and international construction business.
In sum, various actors played a leading role and promoted the national economic development along the time (see Table 1.1). Between 1900 and 1930, during the first phase of the industrialization process, the State and some large universal banks dominated national economy, with a minor role of wealthy entrepreneurial families and cooperatives. In the second phase, when the financial crisis of the 1930s pushed the Italian Government to dismantle universal banks and to buy their shares in industrial companies, the state became the most important shareholder and the driver of the national economic development, flanked by an increasing role of entrepreneurial families and cooperatives after the Second World War. In the current phase, that is, after the large privatizations and the new banking law of the 1990s, entrepreneurial families are the key drivers of the national economy together with the state.
Table 1.1 The role of main actors within major periods of national economy
| 1900â1930 | 1930â1992 | 1992âcurrent |
Major events in the period | Take off of industrialization | Economic crisis followed by the economic miracle New banking law separating commercial and industrial banks Large nationalization | Stagnation of economic development New banking law allowing commercial banks to own shares in industrial companies Large privatization |
State | Highly involved as entrepreneur in capital-intensive industries | Highly involved as entrepreneur in a number of industries | Focused on key strategic industries |
Entrepreneurial families | Involved as entrepreneurs of large companies | Highly involved as entrepreneurs of small and large companies | Highly involved as entrepreneurs of small and large companies |
Banks | Universal banks as controlling shareholder of large companies | Co... |