PART I
Strive to Create a Positive Impact for Your Organization and Yourself
The first three keys to creating a positive impact for your organization and yourself in any job, in any organization are (1) your fit with the key players and with the organizationâs culture; (2) your job challenges in relation to your skills, your effort, and the support you receive to do your job; and (3) the quality of your relationships with the key players and others who are important to your survival and success (Figure 2).
Figure 2 The keys to creating a positive impact for your organization and yourself
Key #1 examines your fit with the key players and with the organizationâs cultureâthat is, the extent to which your beliefs and values are compatible with those of your key players and of others in the organization. The worse your fit, the more difficult it is for you to create a positive impact for your organization and yourself. You will not survive and succeed if your misfit (your âvalues gapâ with the key players and with the organizationâs culture) is irreconcilable. If at all possible, you must avoid such an unbridgeable âvalues gap.â
Key #2 asks whether your skills, the effort you put in, and the support you receive to do your job are adequate given its challenges. If yes, you can perform the job well and enjoy doing it. If notâif there is a âskills, effort, and support gapââyour performance, satisfaction, happiness, and growth will suffer.
Key #3 considers the quality of your relationships with the key players and others who are important to your survival and success. The better your relationships with these people, the more they will support you, and the greater will be your credibility with them. Key #3 is the master key, because it can help you to bridge both your âvalues gapâ and your âskills, effort, and support gap.â
Your credibility (Key #4) is your credit rating in the eyes of the key players and others. It is based on your job performance and other contributions and on how these people perceive these contributions. It can help you to undertake important initiatives that are innovative or politically risky, because the key players and others will support you and even run interference if you have sufficient credibility with them.
The experience of Bob Drake, a new manager, will be used for illustration throughout the book. Here, briefly, is his story.
The first unpleasant surprise for Bob came on his third day with the company when he heard two senior colleagues arguing in public, cursing and shouting at each other. Within the next few weeks he realized this wasnât aberrant behavior in the company. He was also struck by the very long hours, the infrequent group meetings, and the unusually high amount of rumor and gossip. Bob had previously worked for a company where more polite behavior, shorter hours, more team play, and more openness prevailed. He was disturbed, but said to himself, âItâs too bad they operate this way, but I can live with that without becoming a part of it.â
The next shock was of higher voltage. After about two months with the company, Bob was called into his bossâs office and told he was not being âtough enough.â To âreally contribute in this environment,â he was told he would have to become âmore aggressive.â Bob was upset but said nothing. For one who prided himself on his competence, the last thing he felt he needed was advice on personal style.
Bob decided he would redouble his efforts to show these people what he could contribute. A large part of Bobâs job involved dealings with peers in another department, and he decided to show them what he could contribute by putting in long hours with them and going out of his way to help them. What Bob experienced, however, was fierce internal competition and the withholding of important information; appeals to various parties were to no avail. At his 6 monthsâ performance review Bobâs boss told him that he had failed to learn from the feedback given earlier. This was open competition, he was told, and he was not measuring up. Bob got an unsatisfactory rating and was fired.
KEY #1
Your Fit With the Key Players and With the Organizationâs Culture
The first key is the extent to which your beliefs and values are compatible with those of the key players and with the organizationâs culture.1 The better your fit with the key players and with the organizationâs culture, the easier it will be for you to create positive outcomes for your organization and yourself (Figure 3). However, a âperfect fitâ is not generally possible because the key players and the organizationâs culture can differ from you in many obvious and subtle ways. The bigger your âvalues gapâ with the key players and with the organizationâs culture, the more difficult it will be for you to create a positive impact for your organization and for yourself. You must assess the extent of your misfit (âvalues gapâ) and determine if it is irreconcilable (âunbridgeableâ).
Figure 3 Your ability to create a positive impact for your organization and yourself depends on your fit with the key players and with the organizationâs culture
For example, Bob Drake, the new manager, valued teamwork and a cooperative environment. The key players in his organization believed in cutthroat internal competition. Bobâs misfit with them was irreconcilable; he was unable to survive, let alone to succeed in the organization.
Your list of the key players may change over time (see Exhibit 1, page 4), and your fit with them and with the organizationâs culture could get worse or better if their beliefs and values, or yours, change. It is important to assess your fit not only before and after joining an organization but also on a periodic basis thereafter.
If you have an irreconcilable misfit with the key players or with the organizationâs culture, it is generally best to move on if you can. Other types of misfits must be managed constructively, as described later.
To assess your fit with the key players and with the organizationâs culture, you need to determine the extent to which your personal beliefs and values are compatible with theirs. Key #1 provides the concepts, frameworks, and tools for making these assessments.
Beliefs and Values
Beliefs are assumptions about the world and how it works. They derive from personal experience and are reinforced by it. Individuals also rely to some degree on the judgment and expertise of others whom they trust, or can identify with, to help them decide what to believe or not to believe.
Values are a special class of beliefs, called evaluative beliefs. These are assumptions about what ideals are desirable or worth striving for. Values derive from personal experience and identification with those who have had an important influence on a personâs development since early childhood. Values represent preferences for ultimate end states, such as fairness or compassion.2
Personal Beliefs and Values
Your espoused beliefs and values are what you say (to yourself and to others) are your beliefs and values. However, you may not even be aware of your unconscious beliefs and values. Timothy Wilson explains in Strangers to Ourselves, his authoritative and highly readable book on what we know about the unconscious mind (2002, pp. 6â8), as follows3:
According to the modern perspective, Freudâs view of the unconscious was far too limited. . . . The mind operates most efficiently by relegating a good deal of high-level sophisticated thinking to the unconscious, just as a modern jumbo jetliner is able to fly on automatic pilot with little or no input from the human, âconsciousâ pilot. . . . It is best to think of the adaptive unconscious as a collection of city-states of the human mind and not as a single, homunculus like the Wizard of Oz, pulling strings behind the curtain of conscious awareness.
Freud argued that our primitive urges do not reach consciousness because they are unacceptable to our more rational, conscious selves and to society at large. . . . According to the modern view, there is a simpler reason for the existence of unconscious mental processes . . . these parts of the mind are inaccessible to conscious awarenessâquite possibly because they evolved before consciousness did.
Your unconscious beliefs and values may be revealed (to you and others) by observing your behavior and in particular the choices you make over time.4
Value System
The relative ordering of values is what distinguishes one personâs value system from anotherâs. Two people may hold many of the same values, but when these values come into conflict, the individuals may prioritize them very differently.5
For example, Bob Drake and the key players in his organization believed that internal competition and cooperation were important for the effective functioning of an organization. However, the others considered internal competition far more importantâit ranked far above cooperation in their value system. But for Drake, cooperation was much more important. Drake and the key players had very different value systems.
We sometimes donât realize what it is we really value till we donât have it. For example, money was less important to Drake than he thought prior to joining the organization; a congenial work environment was more important to him than he had realized. Thus, our value system gets tested and clarifiedâand our values sometimes get reorderedâwhen we reflect on the choices we make as we live our lives.
The following classification scheme developed by the German philosopher Eduard Spranger, comprising six ideal types of person, is an illustration of how different people rank their values differently6:
1. The theoretical person is primarily interested in the discovery of truth and the systematic ordering of knowledge. The personâs interests are empirical, critical, and rational. Scientists or philosophers are often of this type (but not exclusively so).
2. The economic person is primarily oriented ...