CHAPTER ONE
Introduction: Danes in Wessex
Ryan Lavelle and Simon Roffey
In many ways the title of this volume draws attention to the problems associated with the perception of the Viking Age in the south of England. While scholars commonly deal with the vocabulary of âthe Danelawâ and âAnglo-Scandinavian Englandâ when discussing the east Midlands and northern England, Wessex, for understandable reasons, is an area which is often treated as remaining âAnglo-Saxonâ throughout the later Anglo-Saxon period. This is hardly surprising. The narrative of the ninth and tenth centuries is one of the resistance of the rulers of Wessex against Viking invaders and the eventual imposition of a notion of an âEnglishâ identity, that of the Angelcynn, over parts of the rest of England.1
The survival of the West Saxon dynasty is one of the âgreatâ themes of early medieval English history and it would be perverse if the title of this book were to have been something like Anglo-Scandinavian Wessex or even Viking Wessex (to our publisherâs credit, this title was never suggested to us). The notion of âDanes in Wessexâ, which was the title of the conference from which many of the papers in this volume are drawn, is deliberately unspecific, reflecting the range of ways in which the papers in this volume have interpreted its theme. The lack of a definite article in the title is intentional: we cannot speak of the Danes in Wessex because the notion of âDanesâ, as discussed in our other joint contribution to this volume (Chapter 2), often seems to have been semantically fluid, encompassing members of âVikingâ warbands and settlers who may not just have come from Scandinavia, let alone Denmark; such groups of âDanesâ are likely to have included other Scandinavians (especially Norwegians, as noted in Lavelleâs own contribution (Chapter 8), but also those from north of the Arctic Circle), those from the âDanelawâ regions of Britain and other areas associated with the Viking diaspora such as the Baltic states and Belarus, as well as those who actually came from the provinces of the Danish polities (notwithstanding that these were somewhat different from the twenty-first-century Kongeriget Danmark).2 Again, this is probably understandable, as the volume covers three centuries of early medieval history, during which one could hardly expect notions of identity to remain static. (We might note too that notions of âWessexâ could vary; this is an issue which is touched on in our own contribution to this volume but we have not proscribed our contributorsâ definitions of the region/s, as its geographical variations over three centuries are not insignificant.)
âDanesâ were in Wessex, then, and while there was no âDanishâ Wessex, there were close links between West Saxons and Danes in the early middle ages. These links were not necessarily hostile. The earliest known reference to Denmark, as Denamearc, is, famously, in a vernacular West Saxon version of the work of the late Roman historian Paulus Orosius, The Seven Books of Histories against the Pagans, amongst added details of northern voyages, recounted at the West Saxon court by a Norwegian chieftain, Ohthere (ON Ăttarr).3 Before the Viking Age, as Barbara Yorke noted, the presence at Hamwic (Anglo-Saxon Southampton) of eighth-century âWodan/monsterâ sceattas â coins which âmayâ have been minted in Ribe, Denmark â âimply that the Norwegian marauders [of c.789] may not have been the first Scandinavian ships to land in Wessexâ.4 Still, it is the influences of the âViking Ageâ in Wessex which ensure that the topic of this book is a valid one, determined by two âViking Agesâ in the region:5 the âFirst Viking Ageâ in the second half of the ninth century, traditionally seen to have tailed off in southern England in the early tenth century as the successor of King Alfred, Edward the Elder, took the initiative â perhaps through the support of his sister, ĂthelflĂŚd, âLady of the Merciansâ â by seizing control of areas of the former Danelaw. (Inside the frontiers of Wessex itself the first Viking Age might be said to have ended with the whimper of the night flight of the renegade member of the West Saxon dynasty, dubbed the âking of the pagansâ (rex paganorum) because of his alliances with Danes, Ăthelwold, from Wimborne, Dorset, in 899 or 900, though Wessex was hardly unaffected in the aftermath.6) The activities of the âSecond Viking Ageâ in the later tenth century, which had a direct impact on Wessex, led to the establishment of a Danish dynasty in England, centred on Winchester, as a consequence of the conquest of Cnut âthe Greatâ, son of the Danish ruler Swein Forkbeard, in 1016, with the further influence of Danes in Wessex for at least the next thirty years, arguably the next fifty.
Those two Viking Ages have tended to shape our perceptions of Danish influence in Wessex, and they have often been treated separately, or with the sense that the resistance successfully put up by Alfred the Great as a consequence of campaigns across Hampshire, Dorset, Somerset and Wiltshire during the 870s and other campaigns on the outer parts of what might be termed âGreater Wessexâ in Kent in the 890s can be contrasted with the less successful resistance of the English during the reign of Ăthelred II (âthe Unreadyâ), during which a series of brief âhit and runâ raids rapidly gave way to a series of longer campaigns, with tragic consequences for the king and his kingdom. Depending on their relative temperaments, modern commentators have been more or less vituperative in their criticism for Ăthelred and high-flown in their praise for Alfred, but it should be noted that there is continuity to the Viking Age in Wessex that we should acknowledge. Alfred may have been successful in the campaigns of the late ninth century but the Viking impact was not without significance. There were a small number of âDanesâ who lived peacefully in Wessex as a consequence of the actions of the ninth century, whose presence should not be forgotten,7 but lest this consideration be seen as a radical attempt to unpick a neatly sewn West Saxon history, it is perhaps better to consider the impact itself, for which the broader themes of the two Viking Ages emerge. The Old Minster in Winchesterâs lease of some of its land and stock to the king, at what appears to have been unfavourable terms,8 provides a parallel with the actions of ecclesiastical landholders in the reign of Ăthelred II, during which land was, somewhat more infamously, sold by the likes of Christ Church Canterbury in order to raise money to pay geld.9 Although the parallel is not a new one, it is worth bearing in mind the larger number of surviving charters from the late tenth and early eleventh centuries in comparison to those of the late ninth and early tenth, so those earlier examples from Winchester may represent a much wider phenomenon.
Another theme is of course that of Alfred and his sonsâ emergence as a powerful dynasty. While comparisons with Ăthelred here are â as has been noted â the stock-in-trade of the late Anglo-Saxonist, parallels with the dynasty of Cnut are less common in terms of consideration of Wessex. With a sense of the primacy of Winchester within Wessex, as we shall see in the following chapter, Cnut may have underwritten the history of the English dynasty in the early eleventh century, at a time when, under Ăthelred, London had become more important.10 Although we should probably exercise some caution in reading Alfredâs direct role in the importance of Winchester, there may be something of a parallel in the manner in which the ninth-century decline of Hamwic, perhaps under the pressure of its vulnerability to Viking raids, allowed its smaller neighbour to emerge as an administrative and cultural centre during the course of the ninth century.11
Indeed, it may be noted that while we may still not talk in terms of an Anglo-Scandinavian society in Wessex prior to 1016 (although, as Jane Kershaw shows in chapter 5, Scandinavian material influences were greater than was once thought), the very fact that Alfred and his successorsâ hands were strengthened makes late Anglo-Saxon Wessex itself a direct product of the Viking Age. There is a certain dichotomy between the written sources, which portray Alfred as a pious Christian and Cnut as a Viking warrior, a dichotomy which should be borne in mind when considering their respective impacts upon Wessex and England. Arguably these figures had much more in common than is often acknowledged. Where West Saxon elites had asserted themselves over Britons in the earlier ninth century and Alfred the warrior king had made far more use and reference to the Anglo-Scandinavian roots of his dynasty than the image makers who shaped our picture of the âAlfredian courtâ would have him doing,12 Cnut and some Danish elites whose positions stemmed from his rule asserted themselves as lords over English men and women, while emphasising their Christian culture. In the employment of a Danish elite culture in the eleventh century, the language of assertion had changed but the political and social frameworks in which it was employed remained, in some ways, very much the same as they had been during the ninth century. Thus, a parallel may be made between West Saxon control in the South-West in the ninth century, recently imposed and at times tenuous, and the attention given to the region by Cnut in the early years of his reign, as he strove to ensure loyalty there in the wake of revolt.13
Such assertions of control within West Saxon political frameworks and the demonstration of control in a range of ways by ruling elites, are at the heart of this volume. Though there is, understandably, no consensus of opinion amongst the contributors as to the most significant of the assertions of control in the Viking Age (or the two âViking Agesâ) there is a degree of unity of purpose in the contributions. These encompass the political and social manifestations of âDanishnessâ in Wessex, as well as Anglo-Saxon responses to it. Studies of the Viking Age are often nuanced, focusing on the cultural, social and economic effects of the Viking impact in a manner that requires necessary oversight (or at least pausing) of the view of excesses of violence,14 but an understanding of the violence that underlies that Viking impact remains crucial. While this volume does not hold up an unreconstructed âback to basicsâ reading of the relentless violence of hairy barbarians, the place of Viking Age violence and, of course, violence perpetrated by Vikings should not be underestimated. Two of the contributions to this volume, by Thomas Williams (Chapter 3), and by John Baker and Stuart Brookes (Chapter 5), specifically address the military dimensions of responses to the Viking threat, using the region of Wessex as the focus for the study of wider-ranging phenomena, and fulfil something of the expectation of what might be seen in a volume titled Danes in Wessex. If any doubt remained as to the violence of the age, Angela Boyleâs report on Vikings as victims of violence (Chapter 7) is invaluable.15 Derek Goreâs consideration of the South-West in the ninth and early tenth centuries (Chapter 4), Ryan Lavelleâs discussion of West Saxon ealdormen in the late tenth century (Chapter 8), the first of Ann Williamsâs papers, on the career of a âVikingâ in the early eleventh century (Chapter 9), and indeed some of what follows in our own discussion of manifestations of ethnic identity in Chapter 2 are discussions conceived around the violence of Scandinavian actions, though the violence â whether real or threatened â of incursions, and the violence of responses underlies each of the papers in this volume. Readers of military history, of a narrative of âThe Viking Threatâ, should not be too disappointed, then, though if they expect that narrative to fulfil familiar motifs of threat, response, defeat, resistance, salvation, and struggle, they may be. Where the military history is most useful, it is often in terms of consideration within a wider socio-political context. Thomas Williamsâs contribution considers the experience of the early medieval battlefield and the degree to which shifting cultural expectations in the face of Viking warfare changed the perceptions of the battlefield â and ultimately perceptions of the West Saxon kingdom.16 His chapter, as with other contributions to this volume, shows the value of multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches in terms of the ways in which archaeological readings of the battlefield go beyond the physical stratigraphic remains, many of which, as Williams notes, do not lend themselves to conventional battlefield archaeology.17 Baker and Brookes bring to light their experience in running a cutting-edge project on the development of defensive systems in the Anglo-Saxon kingdom, using place-name, historical and archaeological evidence.18 Their contribution to this volume showcases the value of their work in the Wes...