Great Australian Dissents
About this book
When judges disagree, those in the minority write a dissenting opinion. This book considers the great dissents in Australian law. Their worth may derive from numerous factors, including their rhetorical force as a piece of legal reasoning or emotive power as a judicial lament for the 'error' into which the majority has fallen; the general importance of the issue at stake; as a challenge to the orthodoxy; and, sometimes, the subsequent recognition of a dissenting opinion's correctness and its ultimate vindication. On some occasions, all these features may be strongly present, on others only some. Through a diverse selection of memorable dissenting opinions, this book illuminates the topic of judicial disagreement more generally - not only through examples of instances when minority opinions have been distinctly valuable, but by drawing out a richer understanding of the attributes and circumstances which lead some dissents to become iconic, while so many lie forgotten.
Frequently asked questions
- Essential is ideal for learners and professionals who enjoy exploring a wide range of subjects. Access the Essential Library with 800,000+ trusted titles and best-sellers across business, personal growth, and the humanities. Includes unlimited reading time and Standard Read Aloud voice.
- Complete: Perfect for advanced learners and researchers needing full, unrestricted access. Unlock 1.4M+ books across hundreds of subjects, including academic and specialized titles. The Complete Plan also includes advanced features like Premium Read Aloud and Research Assistant.
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app.
Information
Table of contents
- Cover
- Half title
- Title
- Copyright
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- List of Figure
- List of Table
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction – What Makes a Dissent ‘Great’?
- 2 Justice Barton and the Demise of the Inter-State Commission in the Wheat Case (1915)
- 3 Unrequited but Still Great – The Dissent of Justices Dixon and Evatt in R v Federal Court of Bankruptcy; Ex parte Lowenstein (1938)
- 4 Justice Evatt and the Lost Child in Chester v Waverley Corporation (1939)
- 5 Uther’s Case (1947): Justice Dixon and the Troubled Legacy of the Commonwealth Immunity Doctrine
- 6 'Lone, vehement and incredulous': Chief Justice Latham in the Communist Party Case (1951)
- 7 Public Prosecutor v Oie Hee Koi (1968): Not So Humbly Advising? Sir Garfield Barwick and the Introduction of Dissenting Reasons to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
- 8 The Trouble with Duress: The Dissent of Chief Justice Bray in R v Brown and Morley (1968)
- 9 The ‘Intelligence of a Future Day’: The Vindication of Justice Stephen’s Dissent in Henry v Boehm (1973)
- 10 Justice Mason in the Australian Assistance Plan Case (1975): Nationhood, Federalism and Commonwealth Executive Power
- 11 Justice Murphy's Dissent in Australian Conservation Foundation v Commonwealth (1980): The Birth of Public Interest Standing in Australia?
- 12 The Essence of a Fiduciary Relationship: Justice Mason’s Dissent in Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984)
- 13 The Chamberlain Dissents (1984)
- 14 Treachery or Heroism? The Judgment of Justices Deane and Toohey in Leeth v Commonwealth (1992)
- 15 Justice Dawson's Steadfast Defence of the 'Very Essence of Political Discussion' in Langer v Commonwealth (1996)
- 16 Certainty, Co-existence and the Legacy of Mabo: Justice North in the Miriuwung-Gajerrong Native Title Case (2000)
- 17 When Liberty Divides: Judicial Cleavages and their Consequences in Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004)
- 18 He Who Would Not Be Muzzled: Justice Heydon`s Last Dissent in Monis v The Queen (2013)
- Index
