Nazi Saboteurs on Trial

A Military Tribunal and American Law

Louis Fisher

• Publisher: University Press of Kansas
• Year: 2005
• Print ISBN: 9780700613878
• eBook ISBN: 9780700637492
• Edition: 2
• Topic: Law
• Subtopic: Legal History
• Index: Law

The 9/11 attacks were not the first operations by foreign terrorists on American soil. In 1942, during World War II, eight Germans landed on our shores bent on sabotage. Caught before they could carry out their missions, under FDR’s presidential proclamation they were hauled before a secret military tribunal and found guilty. After the Supreme Court’s emergency session upheld the tribunal’s authority, six of the men were executed.

Louis Fisher chronicles the capture, trial, and punishment of the Nazi saboteurs in order to examine the extent to which procedural rights are suspended in time of war. One of America’s leading constitutional scholars, Fisher analyzes the political, legal, and administrative context of the Supreme Court decision Ex parte Quirin (1942), reconstructing a rush to judgment that has striking relevance to current events.

Fisher contends that the Germans’ constitutional right to a civil trial was hijacked by an ill-conceived concentration of power within the presidency, overriding essential checks from the Supreme Court, Congress, and the office of the Judge Advocate General. He reveals that the trials were conducted in secret not to preserve national security but rather to shield the government's chief investigators and sentencing decisions from public scrutiny and criticism. Thus, the FBI’s bogus claim to have nabbed the saboteurs entirely on their own was allowed to stand, while the saboteurs’ death sentences were initially kept hidden from public view. Fisher also takes issue with the Bush administration’s mistaken citing of Ex parte Quirin as an “apt precedent” for trying suspected al Qaeda terrorists.

Concisely designed for students and general readers, this newly abridged and updated edition provides a cautionary tale as our nation struggles to balance individual rights and national security, as seen most clearly in the recent Supreme Court decisions relating to Yaser Esam Hamdi, Jose Padilla, and the “detainees” at Guantanamo.

Table of contents

• Front Cover
• Half Title
• Series Page
• Title Page
• Copyright Page
• Table of Contents
• Editors’ Preface
• Preface
• 1. School for Saboteurs
• 2. Misadventures in America
• 3. The Military Tribunal at Work
• 4. The Supreme Court Steps In
• 5. Rethinking Tribunals
• 6. Bush’s Military Order in 2001
• Conclusions
• Chronology
• Major Participants
• Bibliographical Essay
• Index of Cases
• Subject Index
• Back Cover