![]()
CHAPTER 1
IS YOUR INFLUENCE OUTDATED?
The challenge begins with the mistaken belief that how we influenced others in the past still works in todayās world of business.
Letās go back to Michael, my client who received the gift of feedback from a car-service driver. There is more to his story.
Like I did, you may have wondered if Michael and his company got the contract he was so confident they would win. It turns out the contract was awarded to a different company, a new player in the industry.
When I asked Michael why he thought they didnāt get the business, he said, āI felt like I gave a powerful and persuasive presentation to the client. And I donāt think I lost the deal because of that less-than-stellar phone call with my contact on the way to the airport, although it probably didnāt help.
āWhen I followed up with my contact, she said the company they chose didnāt have a significantly better solution, cheaper price or more experienced team,ā Michael explained. āShe said they just felt more confident in the other organizationās ability to meet their needs.ā
Although he didnāt realize it at first, what really happened here was that Michael and his team lacked the influence necessary to close the deal. I share Michaelās story because itās a powerful example of what many leaders around the country are now discovering: how we have defined influence in the past doesnāt consistently produce results in the new world of business. Michael and his team were playing by the old rules in a new game and still expecting to win.
While we are all aware (perhaps somewhat painfully) that the business environment has changed dramatically in recent years, few recognize that our understanding of influence hasnāt kept pace with changing times:
- Too many leaders still buy into common misconceptions about how we gain influence and what it means to be influential.
- Technology has made it easier for us to communicate, yet much more difficult for us to influence others.
- Good is no longer good enough in a competitive global marketplace.
- In todayās business world, effective leadership requires influence not only in high-stakes situations but Monday to MondayĀ®.
The prevailing influence paradigm is out of date. The world has changed yet our concept of influence hasnāt. Letās find out why.
THE THREE MYTHS OF INFLUENCE
I wish I had a dollar for every time Iāve heard a client say, āIām influential when I need to beā or āI have influence because I am a [insert any number of executive titles hereāCEO, VP, etc.].ā If only these sentiments were true. Influence would be so much easier.
Much of our thinking (and therefore our actions) around influence is based on misconceptions and mistaken beliefs. If we want to update our thinking about influence, we first need to address what I call the Three Myths of Influence.
Myth #1: āI feel influential, therefore I am.ā
Many people believe that if they feel they are a certain way (such as a good driver or an effective communicator), then it must be true. All too often, leaders mistakenly believe that if they feel influential, then others perceive them the same way. This problem is compounded by the fact that few people are willing to give leaders honest feedback about their influence or lack thereof. As a result, they take their level of influence for granted.
The vice president of sales for a large organization recently told me, āIāve been doing [sales presentations] a long time. Iām always comfortable. I never get nervous when I present.ā I quickly pointed out that comfort doesnāt equal influence!
Just because you feel confident, credible and knowledgeable, and the person sitting across the table from you is nodding his or her head yes, does not mean you are influential. The proof is in the other personās actions. Will they do what you want them to doābuy your product or service, accept your recommendation, follow your lead?
REALITY: Influence is evidenced by results.
Myth #2: Influence is situational.
Many leaders believe influence is a skill set that can be turned on and off, used only as necessary. We show up for the big event or critical conversation and āturn it on,ā meaning we are very conscious of our demeanor, our presence, the words we speak, how we deliver those words, and how we interact with those around us. We turn our influence on for key presentations, sales and creative pitches, board meetings, product launch events, conferences, important meetings or when itās time to rally the team around a goal.
Outside of these high-stakes events, we tend to turn our influence off. We seem to think itās not necessary to be influential in our routine, daily interactionsāanswering the phone, typing out a text or chatting in the hallway. This mindset leads to inconsistent behavior and unpredictable communication between leaders and listeners.
True influence is Monday to MondayĀ®. There is so much more to influence than showing up and giving a powerful presentation or having a meaningful conversation. Real influence is developed not through a series of one-time events, but rather through the accumulation of our daily actions and interactions.
REALITY: Influence is all the time, in every situation.
Myth #3: Title = Influence.
There is a myth in corporate America that influence comes with a title. We operate under the assumption that the higher our position, the longer we have been in our field or industry, or the bigger our success, the greater our influence by default. Many leaders confuse authority and power with the ability to have impact and influence on those around them. You may have power, but do people follow you? Do they willingly act on what you have to say?
The truth is that position and influence are not directly correlated. An impressive title doesnāt buy you a pass. Influence is not a badge of honor you receive as you move up the corporate ladder. Itās not determined by years of service, pay grade, or even contribution or value to an organization.
We inherently know this myth isnāt true when we observe other executives or high-level leaders who lack influence. Yet we donāt consider that same possibility might be true for ourselves. The further irony of this myth is that as you are promoted, your need for influence increases, but a bigger salary and corner office donāt guarantee you will have greater influence. Those with powerful titles are expected to be influential leaders, yet many arenāt.
In The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership, John Maxwell states, āTrue leadership cannot be awarded, appointed or assigned. It comes only from influence, and that cannot be mandated. It must be earned. The only thing a title can buy is a little timeāeither to increase your level of influence with others or to undermine it.ā2
āAn individualās title doesnāt predict influence, which is a problem, especially for someone in my position,ā the CEO of an international advertising agency once said to me. āI often wonder, are people telling me what they think I want to hear because Iām the CEO? Or am I influential because people genuinely believe I have good ideas?ā The good news for this executive is that he truly is influential.
REALITY: Anyone has the capacity to be influential if they are willing to do the work.
Myths and misconceptions are just a few of the many factors that undermine influence. As long as we hang on to these outdated beliefs, we limit our potential to enhance our influence. Do you subscribe to any of the Three Myths of Influence?
The Top Ten Lies We Tell Ourselves about Our Influence
- Iām an executive/leaderāIām already influential.
- I can turn on influence when I need to.
- I feel confident, credible and knowledgeable, so others must experience me the same way.
- Influence only occurs in face-to-face situations.
- Having influence in day-to-day interactions isnāt necessary or important.
- People are on their phones while I talk because that is just todayās culture.
- My work sells itself. I donāt have to be influential.
- What Iāve done in the past has gotten me where I am, and itās good enough to get me where I want to go in the future.
- Influence is a āsoft skillā that doesnāt really matter in the digital age.
- Iām comfortable in high-stakes situations, and if Iām comfortable I must be influential.
TECHNOLOGY: THE DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD
I recently attended a conference where I presented on the topic of influence. On the day of my arrival, I had trouble finding the exact conference location, and I texted the conference coordinator asking for specific directions. Her responses were abrupt and harsh, almost bordering on rude. When I met her in person, I found her to be the complete opposite: approachable, pleasant and welcoming. I presumed the tone of her earlier texts was simply due to stress.
When she and I emailed after the conference, her responses were again curt. I was surprised that someone in such a visible position wasnāt more aware of her virtual persona. If I had never met this woman in person, my perception of her would be based solely on how she came across in her emails and texts. This experience made me wonder how many people have a less-than-positive perception of her and how that might be negatively impacting her business.
Technology has affected almost every aspect of our professional and personal lives, including our ability to influence others. With respect to influence, technology is a double-edged sword. Technology has made it easier for us to communicate, yet much more difficult for us to influence others Monday to MondayĀ®.
In an always-on, always-connected world, we tend to overlook the importance of influence. Too often, we donāt stop to think about how we show up or how our communication will be received. Case in point: the message at the bottom of emails sent via smart phones asking recipients for forgiveness of our spelling errors. Itās easier and fasterāyet far less influentialāto ask forgiveness than to check ourselves before we hit send.
Recent statistics indicate that eighty-nine billion business emails are sent worldwide each day.3 According to The Radicati Group, the average corporate email user sends and receives between 105 and 125 email messages per day.4 That is an astounding number that doesnāt even include text messages. A report by Heywire Business found that 67 percent of business professionals use text messaging for business-related communication. Of those professionals, 72 percent text with internal coworkers and 51 percent text with external contacts such as customers, prospects and vendors. Furthermore, more than 33 percent of sales professionals say they have closed a business deal via text. The report concluded, āBusiness has stopped talking and started texting.ā5
Have you ever thought about how many emails and texts you send each day? Have you thought about how each of those messages impacts your influence? Each one is an opportunity to stand out from the crowd and grow your influence. Each one is also an opportunity to be misinterpreted, to damage your reputation and to negate your influence. Welcome to the new world of business, where your influence is always on display.
When it comes to influence, every interaction matters.
If you remember nothing else from this book, remember this one point: Every single interactionāeven the virtual onesāmatters. Every presentation, conversation, impromptu meeting, email, text, picture, video, post or phone call in the back of a taxiāis a representation of who you are and directly determines how others experience you. Every interaction is a representation of your voice and your personal brand and establishes your reputation. Every interaction either enhances or detracts from your influence.
YOU CAN'T INFLUENCE THEM IF THEY AREN'T PAYING AT TENTION
Imagine that youāve been preparing...