SECTION I
Laying the Foundation
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
EVA M. HORN, SUSAN B. PALMER, GRETCHEN D. BUTERA, AND JOAN A. LIEBER
Six Steps to Inclusive Preschool Curriculum: A UDL-Based Framework for Childrenâs School Success describes an evidence-based curriculum framework that early educators can use to organize curriculum support for young children with and without disabilities in early childhood classrooms. This book is a natural extension of the work of the bookâs and forewordâs authors and contributors, who have participated in multiple research projects within early childhoodâparticularly related to early childhood curriculum and early childhood special education (ECSE) services provided in classrooms within Head Start, publicly funded early childhood, ECSE with peer models, and community-based preschool programs. A more complete description of the evidence supporting the framework is provided in this chapterâs final section about research efficacy.
The book is primarily written to address the needs of the following two audiences. First, early educators such as those previously noted or in similar early childhood education or care settings will find this book useful in their curriculum planning, implementation, and progress monitoring efforts. Second, faculty in early childhood educator preparation programs, including ECSE, as well as professional development providers will find the book useful as they prepare and support early educators to teach all young children.
The purpose of this book is to describe the Childrenâs School Success Plus (CSS+) Curriculum framework for early childhood educators as a guide to plan and deliver instruction for all young children they serve. Too often, children with disabilities are less likely to be provided with the same high-quality curriculum as children without disabilities. The CSS+ Curriculum framework, however, offers guidance to provide equal access to interesting and integrated academic and social curriculum content while simultaneously addressing childrenâs unique learning needs. Strategies for providing challenging and universally designed curriculum content, differentiation through curricular modifications, individualization, and child progress monitoring procedures are provided.
Readers of this book will recognize many curricular elements, domains, and techniques for instruction discussed in early childhood education and ECSE, but the CSS+ Curriculum framework draws all of these together along with additional supports and strategies to include all children. Early educators can use the CSS+ Curriculum framework to embed expected outcomes as framed by local, state, or national early learning standards within any selected curricular content. Educators can use favorite themes or program-selected topics while integrating curricular domains with this evidence-based structure to support high-quality, effective instruction for all children, including children at risk for or identified with a developmental delay or disability.
IMPORTANT CONCEPTS
A number of important concepts related to the CSS+ Curriculum framework will be referred to throughout the book. The following section briefly describes the concepts to provide context for how they are used throughout this book.
Including All Children
Inclusion is the term most often used to express the belief of including all children and the underlying philosophy that all children and their families have a right to opportunities to learn and a sense of belonging. Inclusion for young children has been defined in a joint position statement by the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC):
We embrace this definition as well as the idea that adults must hold high expectations for each child to reach his or her full potential in order for inclusive services to achieve the desired results. Having high expectations means that professionals strive to support children with developmental delays or disabilities to engage in learning challenging curriculum content within the general education classroom, as opposed to assuming children cannot learn particular concepts because of disability or a delay in development. How does one determine the full potential of a child, and could this notion of full potential in the DEC/NAEYC (2009) definition limit high expectations? Teachers of young children must make it a point to regularly reflect on their philosophy and beliefs about teaching and learning. They should use their knowledge of child development to carefully observe children during various activities. Using this reflection and observation, instruction should be thoughtfully planned to support childrenâs learning. Teachers must hold high expectations for all children.
The phrase âaccess to the general curriculum,â which is used in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004 (PL 108-446) to explain that each child should engage with and have access to the same instruction, activities, and experiences as all children; enjoy equal participation; and have the support to do so, if needed, is a simple way to describe inclusive services. Including every child in learning challenging curriculum content, having high expectations for all children, and providing the supports and instruction needed to achieve valuable learning outcomes are ways to ensure that all children have equal opportunities to gain access to what all young children experience.
Active Child Engagement
Preschool children are active, self-motivated learners who learn best from personalized, hands-on, real-world activities with opportunities to acquire knowledge and practice skills in a meaningful context. Vitiello, Booren, Downer, and Williford noted,
Young children construct knowledge by participating with others in activities that encourage choice making, experimenting, problem solving, and reflecting.
Integrated Curricular Content
Curriculum that presents information in a coherent and integrated format facilitates childrenâs learning. Children are more likely to understand concepts and make connections across content domains when curricular elements are integrated. Children are less likely to make sense of their experiences and may quickly forget what they learn when teachers provide fragmented, one-topic instructional content rather than connecting domains to increase meaning and possible generalization (NAEYC, 2009). According to Schickedanz (2008), âIncreasing the integration of learning within multiple content domains and various instructional contexts can help us better manage our time and make our instruction more powerfulâand learning more meaningfulâfor childrenâ (p. 1).
Intentional Teaching
Intentional teachers teach with specific goals in mind for academic and social outcomes related to childrenâs development and learning (Epstein, 2014). An intentional teacher acts purposefully to infuse learning objectives, strategies, and plans into a carefully designed learning environment established for a particular learning activity. Opportunities for child-initiated activities are provided, but they are still guided by adults. Adult-guided activities, however, are designed to facilitate child engagement and choice. Intentional teachers frequently use both child-initiated and adult-directed interaction to set the stage for learning. Preschool children learn best with a blend of adult-directed and child-initiated activities, sensitive and warm interactions, and responsive feedback.
Collaboration
Collaboration is more than individuals working together. It is the process through which individuals with different areas of expertise, knowledge, experiences, and perspectives meet together as a team on a consistent basis. Specifically, the team comes together for the purpose of sharing information, identifying individual children who may need more support in accomplishing their learning goals, developing strategies to solve the problems or concerns, and reflecting on the results of their efforts. The following factors must be in place for effective collaboration to occurâsufficient time to meet, respect for all membersâ contributions, trust, and effective communication.
Family as Partners
Recognizing the childâs family as the first and most important teacher in the lives of children is a central assumption that must be in place for any program that supports young childrenâs development and learning. Thus, ongoing family involvement in the program and developing partnerships with families is a critical aspect of high-quality care and educational programming in preschool (Horn & Kang, 2012). Familyâprofessional partnerships lead to benefits for the child, the family, and the professionals. That is, the child benefits from bringing together multiple perspectives and resources, and the partners (families and professionals) benefit from the availability of multiple perspectives and resources for solving problems and providing for effective learning opportunities (Turnbull, Turnbull, Erwin, Soodak, & Shogren, 2015).
INTRODUCING THE EARLY EDUCATORS
The stories of four early educators and the children and families they serve enrich the presentation of the CSS+ Curriculum framework and are intended to support the readerâs understanding of how implementation can look within the real world of practice. The following terms will be used throughout the book to provide clarity about the role of each of the early childhood educators.
⢠Teacher refers to the educator who takes primary responsibility for planning the curriculum in a particular classroom.
⢠Assistant teacher refers to the educator who works alongside the teacher to provide instruction and support to all children in the classroom.
⢠Itinerant ECSE teacher refers to the educator who consults with the teacher about children with disabilities or who are at risk for developing a disability in programs such as Head Start, publicly funded preschool programs, and community-based child care programs.
⢠Related services providers refers t...