CHAPTER ONE:
Dogs, Cats,
and Marketing
It must have been one of those âlight bulb moments.â A Russian scientist ambles through his laboratory one day, thoughts of digestive secretions on his mind. Idly he watches a lab-coated assistant lean down to pet one of the dogs.
The dog starts drooling, and this routine sight stops the scientist in his tracks. Assistant pets dog, dog salivates (the involuntary, slobbery confirmation the dog is thinking about food). Yet there is no food in sight. Aha! The assistant always wears his lab coat when he feeds the dog. The dog sees the lab coat and thinks food is on the way.
Most of us, faced with a drooling dog, would simply shake our heads and reach for the nearest paper towel. Not Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, who worked with dogs to help him understand the human digestive system.
To get a handle on the relationship between stimulus and response, Pavlov replaced the lab coat with a sound and began an investigation into the world of conditional reflexes. The rest is history. Pavlov won a Nobel Prize in 1904 for his medical inquiries into the physiology of digestion, but he is best remembered as the man who got dogs to salivate to the sound of a bell.1
So what does dog drool have to do with marketing?
Since the time of Pavlov, marketers have been âbell ringersâ, and customers have played the role of the drooling dog. Bells ring everywhereâ there are even ads in urinalsâbut today fewer customers are panting and whining for a bite. Even worse for marketers, many customers simply find all that bell ringing annoying.
What changed? The bell? The dogs? Why arenât customers responding? And what can marketers do about that?
Cooking up a conditioned response
A conditioned response is a simple form of branding, and you canât create a conditioned response in the blink of an eye. Thatâs why marketers insist on creating the most salient ads possible, then broadcasting those to as many people as possible as frequently as possible.
Here is the recipe for âCustomers a la Pavlovâ:
1. Find your dog and keep him a bit hungry. This takes time.
2. Ring your bell, and offer the dog meat. 2Dogs love meat; meat is salient. If you try to associate bell ringing with sawdust, the dog will simply ignore you. No self-respecting dog drools for sawdust!
3. Repeat step #2 over and over and over again. When âbellâ becomes synonymous with âfoodâ in the canineâs gray matter, you can ring the bell, withhold the food, and the dog still salivates.
4. Conditioning can wear off. To keep your dog conditioned, repeat this process frequently.
Modern psychology considers Pavlovâs behaviorist experiment an example of âclassic conditioning,â the goal of which is to instill an association between stimuli (usually external ones like the bell) so that encountering one will bring the other to mind.3
Far-reaching implications
In 1909, the implications of Pavlovâs results came to the attention of American behaviorist John Broadus Watson, then on the faculty at Johns Hopkins University. In 1930,Watson wrote:
Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in, and Iâll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might selectâdoctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief and, yes, even beggar-man and thief, regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, and race of his ancestors. I am going beyond my facts, and I admit it, but so have the advocates of the contrary, and they have been doing it for many thousands of years.4
Watson gained notoriety through his âLittle Albertâ experiments, in which he conditioned a fear response in an eleven-month-old boy, using a white rat and a loud sound.5 Forced to leave academia when he was caught in a sex scandal involving the student who assisted him in this research,Watson turned his attention to advertising and went to work for J.Walter Thompson (now JWT):
. . . where, using techniques from his behavioral psychology, he showed that peopleâs preferences between rival products were not based on their sensory qualities but on their associations. He went on to develop the selling of products like Maxwell House Coffee, Pondâs Cold Cream, Johnsonâs Baby Powder and Odorono (one of the first deodorants). By 1924 he was one of the four vice-presidents of this very successful agency.6
âSo here we have J.B. Watson,â wrote Chris Locke in Chief Blogging Officer, âfather of American behaviorism, packing up all he knows about eliciting the Pavlovian slobber reaction, and wholesaling it to Madison Avenue.â7
Through men like Pavlov and Watson, the seeds for over half a centuryâs worth of marketing practice were planted, then nourished by the âscienceâ of behaviorism and its successful application in the spheres of marketing.
âTomâ foolery
Pavlov used dogs because their digestive systems are similar to those of humans. As all his equipment was set up to accommodate dogs, Pavlov carried out his conditional reflex experiments on dogs.8
We suspect Pavlov would have had a harder timeâand wonder what it might have meant to the development of behaviorist marketing practiceâ had he been working with cats. You can classically condition a response in many creatures, but the ease depends in large part on the nature of your subject and the reinforcement you use.
One basic difference between cats and dogs is motivation.9 Centuries of cat and dog humor captures the stereotypes: A dog wants to please you; a cat couldnât care less. Dogs are devoted and loving and selfless. Cats are aloof, indifferent, and self-indulgent. Dogs are social and act in ways that maintain and support the social order. Cats are solitary and act in ways that benefit themselves.
Cat Haiku
The food in my bowl
Is old, and more to the point
Contains no tuna.
Most problems can be
Ignored. The more difficult
Ones can be slept through.
Am I in your way?
You seem to have it backwards:
This pillowâs taken.10
Yes, a cat may come running when she hears you going for the can opener, and with enough effort you can teach her to roll over on command some percentage of the time. Ultimately, though, her engagement with you lasts only as long as she wants it to last. A cat is not out to please you; sheâs in it for herself.
She is not, and never will be, a dog.
Consumer branding: calling all cats
Early marketers, supported by Pavlovâs research and studies with human subjects, attempted to âproveâ that when businesses rang the right bell the right number of times, they could command desire and behavior in their audience through branding alone. Early successes helped them feel advertising gave them control over their audiences.
When the available advertising media choices were limited and communities were more localized, peopleâs exposure to alternative experiences was restricted. It seemed possible that this theoretical control, or behavior-centeredness, of marketing was the key. Customers did, indeed, appear to salivate to marketingâs bells and responded by buying the most heavily marketed goods and services.
Few anticipated the full effect of blossoming media options on the behaviorist marketing models. Even as late as the mid-1980s, people looked upon burgeoning mediaâbroadcast and cable television and radioâas growing vehicles for delivering messages to even larger audiences who were predisposed to âdevour information and constantly clamor for more.â11 Expanding media markets seemed to offer brilliant opportunities to ring better bells for increasingly more dogs.
Even a casual reading of a newspaperâs business section, with headlines that herald the death of mass-marketing and advertising, reveals the opportunities havenât played out the way weâd hoped.
To everyoneâs disappointment, emerging media are shattering behaviorist marketing tenets. Businesses are not in control of the strings; they can command neither desire nor response. Customers now have access to an unprecedented amount of information and can communicate any time and place they please. As media fragments, so does the âmassâ in mass-marketing.
The window that emerging media has opened for us reveals a personal-experience economy, in which customers are in control. Brand is defined in customersâ minds by their personal experiences with a particular product or service. Attentive only to the information that matters to them, customers are behaving a lot more like cats than like Pavlovâs dogs.
Interactivity has changed the nature of marketing. Marketers must now reach beyond their traditional roles of raising awareness and driving traffic and extend themselves into the more intimate world of sales and customer relations. They are now responsible for creating powerful âpersuasive systemsâ that anticipate and model customer needs, personalize information and processes to meet those needs, and then measure the return on investment for every discrete process in that system.
Technology may evolve at a pace that leaves us breathless, but the essential qualities of human behavior arenât nearly that transitory. The road may have changed, but those traveling on the road havenât.
We are not, and have never been, the metaphoric equivalent of Pavlovâs dogs.
Actually, when it comes to consumer behavior, weâve always been like cats. All it took was a little...