What is the God-given purpose of the local church?
Bobby Harrington gave a lot of his extra time for about a decade to train church planters and create church planting networks. He did it joyfully. But one day, flying out of Nashville for a network meeting in another city, a vague thought became a clear realization: he was uneasy with the churches being planted. Would the result of all these church planting efforts really last? Would the churches planted truly please God, long term?
The church planters were godly, wonderful people. The theology was good. Their level of commitment was inspiring. But he wondered if the approach to church planting that he and his peers (including various church planting organizations) were advocating was often leading to a shallow, cultural Christianity. Before giving himself to church planting, he had already concluded the same thing about many established churches. Too often they had problems with legalism or traditionalism or they lacked authenticity or something else that missed Jesusā heart for a lost and hurting world. But that day, he finally admitted to himself that he was witnessing much of the same cultural Christianity in the church planting world. Something at a fundamental level needed reevaluation.
It was around this time that we (Jim and Bobby) became good friends. We had the same fundamental belief. Maybe you agree with us? When it comes to the local church in North America today, something is not working.
The big question driving this book is the question of effectiveness. For a moment, resist the urge to defend yourself or your church. Donāt defend your experience in ministry, your seminary degrees, or your genuine heart for seeing people come to know Christ. Donāt defend any of the activities taking place at your church. And donāt defend the size of your congregation, the amount of giving, your service to the poor, or the number of new converts. Simply ask yourself, Is the church producing results? Is it doing its job in the best way possible? And please resist the urge to quickly answer yes.1
Itās true that throughout North America today, though numbers are declining, there are still many people coming to church, and some are busy with ministry-related activities. There are ministries to the poor. Buildings are being built. Programs are running at full tilt. Money is being given.
But attendance, busyness, construction, finances, and programs are not real indications of success. The core question of effectiveness ā the question that ultimately matters ā is whether the people who are getting saved are being conformed to the likeness of Christ. Are we making mature disciples of Jesus who are not only able to withstand the culture but are also making disciples of Jesus themselves?
Letās look at some research.2
Consider how recent statistics show that when it comes to morality and lifestyle issues, there is little difference between the behavior (and one can assume condition of the heart) of Christians and non-Christians.
Divorce rates are about the same.
The percentages of men who regularly view pornography are roughly the same ā and itās a lot of men.
Christians are considered to be more than two times as likely to have racist attitudes as non-Christians.
Domestic violence, drug and alcohol abuse, and most other problems are just as prevalent among Christians as among non-Christians.
Consider too statistics about evangelicals. About one in four people living together outside marriage call themselves evangelicals.
Only about 6 percent of evangelicals regularly tithe.
Only about half the people who say they regularly attend church actually do. And a significant number of younger adults (millennials) believe that evangelical churches are not even Christlike or Christian. Sixty to 80 percent of young people will leave the church in their twenties.3
Fewer than one out of five who claim to be born-again Christians have a worldview of even a few fundamental biblical beliefs. Plenty of people call themselves Christians, but very few people can actually tell you what it means ā from the Bibleās perspective ā to be a Christian. They might call themselves Christians, but they also believe that the Bible is full of errors or that God is not one God manifest in three persons or that Jesus Christ did not lead a sinless life (or that he isnāt God) or that simply being good will get you into heaven.
When you ask most evangelicals what their job as a believer is, they may tell you that they are to share Christ, but how many actually do? At worst, they follow the rule that you donāt talk about politics and religion, and they will die without ever seeing anyone come to faith. At best, they may invite people to church, but they think making disciples is not their job; itās the pastorās job.
We could go on and on. One canāt help but conclude that something is wrong. Whereās the lasting life change? Where are the transformed lives? Why are people in our churches just like the world? Why are we not developing people who are Christlike?
A few years back, Bill Hybels, pastor of Willow Creek Church, one of the most influential churches in America, revealed the results of a months-long study into the churchās effectiveness. The conclusion was that the church simply wasnāt producing the results they were hoping for. Willow Creekās leaders did research into other churches across the country and came to the same conclusions.4 In the foreword to Reveal, a book outlining their discoveries, Bill Hybels wrote, āThe local church is the hope of the world. For a number of years now, I have shared this message whenever Iāve had the opportunity to serve pastors of local churches across the nation and around the world. Itās a message I believe with all my heart. So you can imagine my reaction when three people whose counsel I value told me that the local church Iāve been the pastor of for more than three decades was not doing as well as we thought when it came to spiritual growth. As if that wasnāt bad enough, they said this wasnāt just their opinion. It was based on scientific research.ā5
The results rocked Willow Creekās world. Willow Creekās leaders realized that they had to make significant changes. Hybels put it this way: āOur dream is that we fundamentally change the way we do church. That we take out a clean sheet of paper and we rethink all of our old assumptions. Replace it with new insights. Insights that are informed by research and rooted in Scripture. Our dream is really to discover what God is doing and how heās asking us to transform this planet.ā6
Thatās whatās required of us as well. To be effective, we need to make a fundamental shift in the way we do church. What weāre doing now isnāt working, at least not like weād hoped. We have defined ourselves by emphases and methodologies that donāt produce results.
Fortunately, there is hope ahead. Within the pages of Godās Word is a design that will lead to effectiveness. The solution to our ineffectiveness as churches involves following a clear and uncomplicated way to train people to be spiritually mature, fully devoted followers of Christ, and then in turn having those disciples make more disciples.
What we need in our churches today are fewer āChristians,ā at least in todayās popular definition of the word. Now, I donāt want fewer saved people. Far from it. I want as many to be saved as possible. But the point is that fewer than we think are actually saved.
What I want are full-fledged followers of Jesus Christ, and to produce that in our churches today, we need a radical shift. We need more of the engine that Jesus used to change the world, the engine he instructs us to use. This engine will not create perfect churches, but it will create effective churches.
Itās relational discipleship.
Is the church today doing its job to the degree that it could?
FOUR MAIN CATEGORIES
How did the church get to the state itās in today? Simply put, the problem stems from the way todayās churches are designed. Within North America, each local church is characterized by two important components.
The first is focus. Think of a churchās focus as the primary emphasis that it commits its time and resources to achieve. Itās the engine that drives everything else in that church. For instance, a church may desire to reach lost people, so it will expend its energy and resources on bridge events and worship services focused on giving reasons to believe and issuing invitations to accept and follow Christ.
The second component is methodology. This is the way a church sets itself up systematically to accomplish its purpose, or the manner in which it tries to achieve its focus. It could also be thought of as a structure or a system environment (as we call it in the sports world) that a church has created to accomplish what it values.
Every church has its focus and its methodology for achieving its focus whether it realizes it or not. When looking at the different kinds of churches, leaders disagree over how many categories of churches exist today. Some hold that there are only two main categories ā attractional and missional. Others add a third ā organic (sometimes called āhouseā). Others add a fourth ā educational. The disagreement stems mainly from crossover and blending of focus and methodologies. Truly, most churches donāt fit any category exactly. Nevertheless, I find that most churches today will lean toward one of the following four categories, even if a category doesnāt fit precisely.
Category 1: Educational
A pastoral-educational focus with a classroom methodology.
In the educational category, a church uses the bulk of its energy on biblical education, and itās understood that the pastorās job (along with the pastoral staff) is to provide this education for the people. Leaders and members make well-intentioned statements such as, āWe believe the Bible is Godās Word, and we want to get it into the heads of our people.ā Churches with this emphasis focus on Bible study and doctrine.
The methodology in these churches is most often the classroom model. A strong emphasis is placed on Sunday morning teaching times, Sunday school attendance, perhaps a midweek educational forum, youth and childrenās programs and Bible studies, and perhaps information-oriented teacher-led small groups.
Sometimes a strong emphasis is placed on pastoral care as well, though few churches, especially larger churches, are intentional about this aspect. The paid, formally trained, professional pastors are responsible for developing and implementing programs for teaching Bible knowledge. The pastors in churches where care is expected are also responsible for caring for the congregants, so heavy expectations are placed on the pastorsā time. Congregants want pastors to visit them in the hospital, counsel them, open meetings with prayer, attend myriad planning meetings, drop everything to come to their aid in family crises, and seldom take time off for vacation (otherwise, who will lead the church?).
The educational model typically doesnāt stress attracting new people to the church as much as it does educating and taking care of people who are already there. Those who come through the door expect to be biblically educated, and this is often (in their minds) the meaning of ābecoming a mature disciple.ā The hope is that the education will translate to Christian behavior outside the walls of the church.
Category 2: Attractional
An attractional focus with an entertainment methodology.
The well-meaning emphasis in the attractional category is placed on biblical evangelism through church services and large events that attract people. Helping people to āmake decisions for Christā is primary. It is assumed that discipleship will happen through church attendance. Some churches in this category seek to retain people who have attended church for years in more traditional settings, by updating the way songs are sung and lessons are taught. The modern way of doing things tends to keep people from being bored with church, at least for a while. The key is to design church services to win people.
In this category, people are attracted to the church because they have real questions and hurts that need answering and dealing with. The sermons are designed to answer those questions and address those hurts. The leaders in these churches are focused on taking ground outside the walls of the church by using the weekend service as a hook. They really seek to inspire Christians to invite their friends to the services where an invitation to accept Christ is given. Worship se...