Paul the Apostle (1:1)
The name âPaulâ (Paulus in Latin, Paulos in Greek) was a relatively common name in the ancient world. âPaulâ is either a cognomen or a nickname used because the Hebrew âSaulâ (ĆĄÄÊŸĂ»l) was foreign to Greek speakers. In the prescript of the letter Paul immediately sets out his credentials to the Romans in three quick-fire descriptions of himself as âservant [slave],â âapostle,â and âset apart.â
Paul first describes himself as a âservant of Jesus Christâ (see âservants of the Lordâ in 2 Kgs 18:12 [Moses]; Judg 2:8 [Joshua]; 2 Sam 7:5 [David]; Amos 3:7; Zech 1:6 [the prophets]). The word doulos has the nuance of âslaveâ and denotes one subject to the authority of another. Paul uses this expression of himself elsewhere in his letter openings (Phil 1:1; Titus 1:1; cf. Gal 1:10). As a âslave of Christâ Paul is expressing his solemn devotion to Jesus in terms analogous to the master-slave relationship with connotations of absolute belongingness and total submission. While all Christians are slaves of Christ (see 1 Cor 7:22 â 23; Eph 6:6), Paul is a special slave with a special office. The title âJesus Christâ probably first emerged as a shorthand way of saying Jesus is the Christ or Jesus is the Messiah. In fact, âJesus Christâ is probably an encoded reference to the status and story of Jesus as the Messiah of Israel and Lord of the cosmos.1
A second element that Paul introduces about himself is that he was âcalled to be an apostle.â The call was not an invitation; instead, it was a radical summons. In the Septuagint âcallâ (klÄtos) is equivalent to âchooseâ (e.g., Isa 41:9; 42:6; 48:12). Paul did not volunteer for service, but he was chosen to be an apostle by a sovereign action of God (see Gal 1:1; 1 Cor 15:10). This arresting sense of divine call is reminiscent of the commissioning of prophets in the Old Testament like Amos, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel. Paul stands in a line of great prophetic figures whom God chose and utilized for his own redemptive purposes.
An âapostleâ means literally âone who is sent.â It is most likely indebted to the Jewish concept of a ĆĄÄliaáž„ â the sending of an envoy who represents the sender as if himself in person. In Hebrews, Jesus is called an âapostleâ in the sense that he is sent from God (Heb 3:1). Titus and Epaphroditus are each designated as an apostolos (âmessengerâ) of certain churches (2 Cor 8:23; Phil 2:25). At the end of Romans, Andronicus and Junia are known as âoutstanding among the apostles,â which probably indicates their role as missionaries sent out from a Christian community (Rom 16:7). Although Paul was not one of the twelve disciples, he encountered the risen Jesus on the road to Damascus and was called to his apostolic work to proclaim the gospel among the nations (see Acts 22:21; 26:16 â 18; 1 Cor 9:1; 15:8 â 9; Gal 1:15 â 16).2
The third aspect of Paulâs self-description is that he was âset apartâ for an evangelistic task. Ironically, the former Pharisee who gloried in his set-apartness from sinners is now set apart as Godâs messenger to the quintessential sinners, the Gentiles. A similar testimony is given by Paul in Gal 1:15, where he described how God âset me apart from my motherâs womb and called me by his grace.â
In the church at Antioch, the Holy Spirit led the community to âset apartâ Paul and Barnabas for the work which God had called them to undertake (Acts 13:1 â 3). This set-apartness is also related to the priestly service of carrying the gospel to the nations that Paul undertakes (Rom 15:16).
Paul was called to be a servant and an apostle, set apart for a priestly work. These are not merely descriptions, they are tasks; Paul serves, was sent, and was consecrated for the sake of the âgospel of Godâ (see Rom 15:16; 2 Cor 11:7; 1 Thess 2:2, 8 â 9; 1 Tim 1:11).3 What Paul says about himself is geared toward explaining his role as a herald of the âgospel of God.â No sooner has Paul mentioned the âgospel of Godâ than he proceeds to describe the âgospel concerning his Sonâ in 1:3 and the âgospel of his Sonâ in 1:9. Elsewhere when Paul mentions the gospel, it is usually in association with Jesus Christ as its main subject (see 1 Cor 9:12; 15:1 â 5; 2 Cor 2:12; 4:4; 9:13; 10:14; Phil 1:17; 1 Thess 3:2; 2 Thess 1:8; 2 Tim 2:8). The interchangeability of âSon,â âJesus,â and âGodâ as subjects of the gospel is possible because the identity of God is bound up with the âone Godâ and âone Lordâ who are both revealed in the gospel (see 1 Cor 8:6). That means to tell the gospel of God is to tell the story of Jesus. The gospel narrates how God breaks into the world through his Son and the Spirit in order to fulfill the promises that he made to his people.
None of this should surprise us because Romans is the most theocentric letter of the Pauline corpus, with the word theos (âGodâ) occurring 153 times! Paul is the quintessential Jesus freak, but he is not a mono-Jesus adherent. In fact, God, Son, and Spirit all figure prominently in his opening narration of the gospel story in Romans 1:1 â 4. Theologically speaking, Romans is a discourse about God as he is known through the gospel. As the apostle called, sent, and set apart by God, Paul sets out before the Roman Christians the story of how Godâs plan to repossess the world for himself has now been executed in his own Son, the Lord Jesus Christ.
Before we expound Paulâs gospel further, it is important to establish the background story of âgospelâ in its various contexts. From Isaiah 40:9 and 52:7 we learn that the âgood newsâ (the meaning of the two components of eu-angelion, âgospelâ) is the announcement that Godâs reign is coming because God himself is coming; he will at last redeem his people from exile and slavery and shepherd them; then the ends of the earth will see his salvation.4 Also, when Jesus began his ministry in proclaiming the gospel, he did not go around simply announcing that he was about to die for the sins of the world and thereafter people will be able to get into heaven. He was picking up this prophetic story line of national sin-exile-redemption-new creation. When Jesus preached the âgospel of Godâ (Mark 1:14) and the âgospel of the kingdomâ (Matt 24:14), he was saying that these prophetic promises were coming to fruition. The shot clock had counted down to zero, the new exodus was here, Godâs reign was at last breaking in, and the proof of this was the healings and exorcisms he was performing (e.g., Luke 11:20).
Furthermore, we should note the usage of âgospelâ (euangelion) in the context of the political propaganda and religion of the Roman Empire. The Romans had their own âgospelâ about the accession of new emperors to the throne. In AD 69, while laying siege to Jerusalem, the Roman general Vespasian decided to press his claim to imperial power after the deaths of three emperors in a three-year span. Listen to what Josephus says about him: âWhen news spread of Vespasianâs accession to the throne every city celebrated the good news and offered sacrifices on his behalfâ (Josephus, War 4.618), and âOn reaching Alexandria Vespasian was greeted by the good news from Rome and by embassies of congratulations from every quarter of the world, now his own ⊠the whole empire being now secured and the Roman state saved beyond expectationâ (ibid., 4.656 â 57).
Giv...