Every man is a creature of the age in which he lives, and few are able to raise themselves above the ideas of the time.
Voltaire
The search is on to discover the best ways technology can be used to enhance, enrich and extend learning. This is not an easy quest to achieve, because technologies do not sit easily alongside traditional pedagogical methods. And yet they should, because as Clay Shirky argues, the social media tools and mobile phones we use are not alternatives to real life, they are now an integral part of it.
There should be no false distinctions between the real world and the digital world in schools. There are certainly none in the minds of students. Sadly, in institutional terms the distinctions do persist, because a notoriously conservative culture pervades schools and universities. New technologies and new ideas are regarded with suspicion. Computers are confined to âspecialâ labs in schools. Mobile phones are banned in many classrooms and social media services are blocked by education authorities. Video games are viewed as a distraction and a waste of time, and certainly nothing to do with learning.
Meanwhile, as education strives to preserve its old traditions, an entirely new generation of learners, immersed in the digital world from birth, is entering our gates. They are demanding â and expecting â new approaches to learning, approaches that incorporate technology.
All change
Incorporating new technology into everyday professional practice is not an easy prospect for the average teacher. Schooling in its present form was designed to meet the needs of a society that no longer exists. This is a view that is gaining a great deal of traction. In his famous TED Talk, Sir Ken Robinson argues that while other professions are rapidly adapting to meet the changes, education is standing firm, stoically preserving its status quo. This is not simply rhetoric. Itâs a warning. The formal learning spaces, traditional approaches, standardised delivery of content, and the restrictive manner in which learning is measured, all seem increasingly anachronistic.
Society is in transition, and the changes are rapid and relentless. Organisations everywhere are investing in new technologies, and the world of work is constantly changing, shifting from centralised to disaggregated. Almost every week, news channels report the arrival of a new device or technology that will supposedly make our lives easier. The changes seem to accelerate, leaving us all just a little bewildered.
The futurist Ray Kurzweil has suggested that where change was linear, now it is exponential. Change is now accelerating at an unprecedented rate. The result is that many traditional systems such as government, healthcare, transport, entertainment and communications are being disrupted and consequently transformed. Meanwhile, state-funded education stands like a rock amidst this maelstrom, largely unchanged.
Improving education
Is education changing at all? Some would assert that it is. Later in this book I will offer some evidence to support this claim. There are some signs in certain places that change is happening, but with change comes uncertainty and anxiety, and there is often a human price to pay. New technical infrastructures are now widely available, the Internet is familiar to many, and mobile devices are proliferating. This has prompted a rise in informal learning. The growth of movements such as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are accelerating this growth, heralding an uncertain, turbulent future for formal education.
Clearly, those who are fighting to preserve what is good in education will need to ensure that what happens in schools and universities is relevant to this generation, and is reconciled with the needs of future society. However, they may be fighting a losing battle if they rely solely on technology. Simply introducing technology into the classroom is not enough. Teachers will need to understand how new technologies can be used to improve pedagogy. Additionally, education leaders will need to understand the link between change management and the optimisation of learning outcomes. Often this is less than explicit. Most crucially, all educators will need to know how pedagogy should change to meet studentsâ needs in this disruptive era of technology and new working environments â teachers will need to understand the theory behind the practice.
Teachers will not achieve these quests by being timid, or reluctant to engage with technology. Nor, on the other hand, will they fully understand the benefits of technology if they believe that it is the only answer. Technology is not a silver bullet. Simply applying technology because itâs new and shiny, or because âeveryone else is doing itâ, is almost always a mistake. It is a false economy, and it does children a disservice. It also opens the door for sceptics such as Larry Cuban to argue scathingly that computers in schools are oversold and underused. Indeed, there is a truth to this opinion. Many schools and universities have cupboards full of technology that is gathering dust because no one actually figured out what to do with it before it was purchased. They are the proverbial solutions looking for problems to solve.
A greater problem arises when new technology is introduced into an old system only to be used to perpetuate old practices. Let me explain this with the help of an ancient tale.
An old story
We can learn a lot from old stories and ancient histories. This extract from the Bible illustrates the perennial problem:
No man putteth new wine into old wineskins; else the new wine will burst the wineskins, and be spilled, and the wineskins shall perish. But new wine must be put into new wineskins; and both are preserved.
Luke 5:37â38
This parable is often wrongly cited as ânew wine in old bottlesâ. To appreciate the full meaning of the metaphor, itâs important to use âwineskinâ rather than âbottleâ, so letâs deconstruct the meaning behind the parable of the new wine in old wineskins.
Two thousand years ago in Israel, at the time of Jesus Christ and his disciples, wine was stored in skins. These were usually bladders fashioned from goat or sheep skin, which held the liquid. Invariably the wine would ferment inside the skins, forcing them to expand to their limit, eventually causing them to become brittle. Once used, the wineskins had to be discarded; otherwise, if reused, the new wine would ferment, expand them beyond their capacity, and cause them to burst. It was a false economy not to buy new wineskins to store the new wine. Wine was spoilt and money lost when the rubric was ignored.
The power of the parable therefore resides in the nature of the wineskin. It has been used to show how volatile it can be when old and new cultures collide. Alvin Toffler illustrated this phenomenon in Future Shock, warning that where old and new cultures clash, there will be disorientation, confusion, stress, disruption ⌠and there will also be winners and losers.
Disruption
Today we are witnessing a clash of cultures in education, across all the sectors of learning and teaching. In fact we have been facing this challenge for some time. It is a struggle between the old and the new, the closed and the open, the traditional and the radical. In this context, putting new wine into old wineskins means that new practices do not sit comfortably with old mindsets. I would develop this further to argue that it is difficult to explain or justify new methods with old theories. New approaches often break the boundaries and rules that were established by the old traditions, which results in a human cost. People become uncomfortable when their old practices are disrupted and they are forced to relinquish that with which they have become familiar. Some resist valiantly, others simply pay lip service.
Change is inevitable (except apparently, from a vending machine). Change is rarely an easy process to manage, and disruption is never fully welcomed by any profession, but it is not necessarily bad news. As well as presenting a threat, disruption can be a positive force, providing fresh opportunities to improve practice. The rapid influx of new technologies into formal education has already disrupted many old practices, and has created a fair amount of stress for practitioners who have become comfortable with old practices. But it has also ushered in new ways of doing things. There are winners and losers. Some teachers thrive, others merely survive, and some sadly fall by the wayside.
Change is exactly what educators face each and every day, but is it the right kind of change?
New wine technology
The parallels between the wineskin parable and the state of the current state education system are abundantly clear. A new society with new needs clearly requires new methods of teaching. I have heard it said that the 1.0 School is no longer able to effectively teach the 2.0 Student. Massified state-funded education is no longer adequate to support the needs of a distributed, diverse society. When what is offered does not meet the needs or satisfaction of students, they will either subvert the system or they will fail.
If a school bans mobile phones, the students will still use them anyway, most probably for unscholarly purposes. If new technology is used in the same way as old technology, the pedagogy âwineskinâ is likely to fail. If the new technology is used inappropriately we can expect a similar outcome. There is no pedagogy for irrelevance.
When interactive whiteboards (IWBs) were first introduced into classrooms, they were a surprise. After a short hiatus while the new tools were appraised, many teachers began either to overtly resist, or use them conservatively, often in the same way they had used the older dry-wipe whiteboards. This kind of ersatz compliance was in reality a passive form of resistance. Usually teachers resisted because of ignorance due to a lack of training, but it might also have been because of technophobia â a fear of the new technology and the discomfort it might bring. Again, the application of some useful pedagogical theory would have helped. An understanding of how interactive tools such as the IWB can be applied to engage students and to support their learning would transform its use in formal education.
There are alternative uses for the IWB which draw on pedagogical theories. Allowing children to come to the front to use the IWB would transform it from a didactic teaching resource into an interactive learning resource, and extend studentsâ knowledge beyond what they could achieve on their own. Creating their own content on the IWB would increase their chances of developing a deeper understanding. However, teachers are often reluctant to allow students to touch the expensive equipment due to a host of perceived risk factors, or they simply donât conceive that student use might be possible â they see the IWB solely as a teaching resource.
And so the old practices continue, negating the disruptive, creative potential of the new technologies, with the result that teaching does not improve. Bec...