1
From YorĂčbĂĄ to YouTube
Studying Nollywoodâs Star System
When Nollywood star Omotola Jalade-Ekeinde was shooting the VH1 drama series Hit the Floor in February, 2013, she started live-tweeting from the set, describing the Paramount lot and calling her colleague Kimberly Elise âa beautiful Method actor.â That tweet in particular seemed to say so much all at once: that a Nollywood star can thrive when 8,000 miles from home and filming scenes with an American costar; that she can classify that costarâs performance style according to what is perhaps the most revered model of realist acting; that she can join forces with a fellow woman of color in order to furnish a reflection of global âgirl powerâ (the tweet came with the hashtag âGirlsRockâ); and that she can define her own ever-evolving identity as a truly boundless one. This tweet alone displays the notion that Nollywoodâs star system well equips its constituents to achieve expansive success. Omotola Jalade-Ekeinde has, as she says, âthe powerâ to infiltrate American popular culture; the proof is in the Instagram photos that she providesâthe charming self-portraits of the Nigerian star weaving her way through a Melrose Avenue lot with the legendary Paramount banner as a backdrop.
When a star like Omotola travels to Hollywood, she demonstrates the possibility of respecting Nollywoodâs specificityâits celebrated self-development outside of state support and foreign subsidiesâwhile simultaneously linking it, via the visibility of stardom itself, to production sites in Los Angeles. VH1âs Hit the Floor may not represent a Hollywood-Nollywood coproduction in the conventional economic sense, but it still makes use of a performer whose star was born within the boundaries of southern Nigerian films. Conceivably, Jalade-Ekeindeâs travels to Hollywood help shed light upon the singularity of Nollywood without necessarily introducing a qualitative dimension or suggesting a hierarchical relationship between the two industries. If Nollywood develops star performers whose identities become so widely known and so wildly popular that Hollywood begins to take notice, and if such stars as Jalade-Ekeinde accept acting gigs in Los Angeles, then Nollywood and Hollywood do not necessarily converge in typical ways. VH1âs Hit the Floor is not, after all, an international coproduction; it remains very much an American project. But one of its performers is a Nollywood legend.
FROM TELEVISION TO âCINEMAâ: BILLING VIDEO STARS
In focusing on Jalake-Ekeindeâs actions in Hollywood, I am perhaps getting ahead of myself. How, after all, did the actress become a star in the first place? What is her personaâs special significance in Nollywood, and how does the industry develop stars more generally? Such questions are rarely asked in scholarship on Nollywood, if only because the matters of narrative, aesthetics, economics, and accessânot to mention of nation, region, race, and cultureâhave been so pressing. But one could easily argue that without stars, such industrial factors simply would not matter, precisely because Nollywood, as popularly defined, would not really exist. âEvidence of a Nigerian star system dates back at least as early as 1992,â writes Stefan Sereda, âapparent in the opening credits of the best-selling Living in Bondage.â1 While he does not elaborate, Sereda is right to look to on-screen credit sequences for evidence of stardom in operation. Indeed, Living in Bondage functioned, in part, to publicize a host of well-known Nigerian television stars as, suddenly and specifically, movie stars, using its opening-credit sequence to signal a new set of professional terms for Francis Agu and Kanayo O. Kanayo, among other beloved performers. Broadly speaking, the politics of billing, in which one performerâs name will inevitably appear before (or larger than) anotherâs, can lead to illuminating superimpositionsââjuxtaposed graphic signifiers of stardom and success,â to quote Lisa Kernan.2
The significance of the on-screen (opening or closing) credit sequence should not be underestimated. Jonathan Gray argues that such sequences serve âto create genre, character, and tone,â but surely they also function to foreground stardom, literally showing who comes first in the panoply of performers.3 The one-name-after-another crawl of a credit sequence is perhaps the clearest textual indication of a hierarchy of actors and actressesâof a behind-the-scenes star system with demonstrable on-screen effects (such as, for instance, a performerâs precise role and time spent in front of the camera). Anyone who regularly watches Nollywood films has surely had to sit through more than a few elaborate, impossibly prolonged opening-credit sequences in which superimposed performersâ names slowly fade in and out, or in which such names become legible through digital pixels that explode into different directions in order to make way for the next credit.4 Such sequences usually end, as in Western media, with the identification of the director, reflecting Nollywoodâs auteurist culture and also inviting auteurist analyses. But they also, invariably, illuminate particular pecking orders among performers, some of which might seem surprising.
Consider, for instance, the case of Emotional Crack (Lancelot Oduwa Imasuen, 2003). In this film, Stephanie Okereke plays the lead role, that of Crystal, a battered housewife who has an affair with her husbandâs mistress, Camilla (Dakore Egbuson). Despite the fact that Okereke has by far the most screen time, her name appears fourth in the opening credits, reflecting a stardom that was, for the performer, nascent in 2003 and easily eclipsed by that of three others (two of whose names appear before the filmâs title): Ramsey Nouah (who plays Crystalâs abusive husband, Chudi), Patience Ozokwor (popularly known as Mama G, who plays Crystalâs protective mother, Magdalene), and Dakore Egbuson. Befitting images that were well-established and widely celebrated by 2003, Nouah and Ozokwor are the two above-the-title stars, and Egbuson is the performer whose name appears immediately after the words âEmotional Crackâ but before Okerekeâs credit.
Viewed today, in the wake of Okerekeâs ascension to the ranks of Nollywoodâs most prolific and itinerant writers, directors, and performers, the opening credit sequence of Emotional Crack might seem strange and somewhat misleading as an entrĂ©e into the narrativeâs breakdown of characters. Okereke, however, has frequently been at the center of similarly odd or inaccurate billing practices: in the opening credits of Teco Bensonâs 2002 thriller Terror, the words âIntroducing Stephanie Okerekeâ are superimposed over a shot of her character typing away on an office computer; Okereke, in fact, began acting in 1997 at the age of fifteen, when she appeared (albeit in relatively small roles) in multiple Nollywood films. An equally deceptive credit occurred in 2009, when the first posters advertising the Nigerian theatrical release of Izu Ojukwuâs Nnenda gave Okereke fourth billing, after the male stars Francis Duru, Ramsey Nouah, and Uti Nwachukwu, despite the fact that Okereke (who was by then a major international star) plays the prominent title role. Suggesting a level of sexism incommensurate with Nnendaâs feminist narrative (the film follows an intrepid activist as she seeks to reform orphanages), the initial, controversial posters also signaled an opportunistic attachment to reality television: Uti Nwachukwu, who received billing above Okereke despite his comparably scant screen time and short Nollywood rĂ©sumĂ©, had represented Nigeria on the third season of Big Brother Africa, becoming a fan favorite and later winning the seriesâ fifth season, titled All-Stars. But was it really a movie-style stardom that Nwachukwu had earned with his reality-TV victory or just a reasonable degree of name recognition and an associated commercial cachet? As Julie Wilson argues, reality television stardom represents a culturally debased yet readily salable phenomenon, one that is frequently defined against a more âgenuine,â intricate, or intelligent cinema stardom. When reality stars attempt to shift toward this more respectable echelon, they are often stymied by the publicity circuits that, in Wilsonâs words, âdo not primarily work to construct a broader star imageâ for each of the individuals in question, and that prefer to function within limited rhetorical constructs (âthe âgood girl,â the âscheming bitch,â the âaverage joe,â the âhomophobic jockââ). Publicity for reality TV thus acknowledges that the formatâs stars must âplay rolesââthat each is compelled to âperform an identityââbut it does not, generally speaking, allow for much flexibility, in contrast to more searching coverage of bona fide film stars.5
In Nigeria, the culturally denigrated status of reality-TV stardom is arguably a function of the reality format itself rather than a reflection of televisionâs âlesserâ status vis-Ă -vis cinema, in large part due to the longstanding lack of extensive moviegoing opportunities for Nigerians. Within the nationâs particular postcolonial circumstances, the small screen has always been an acceptable place for stardom, if only because it has often seemed like the only place, the only available medium. However, the television stardom that served to publicize Living in Bondage as a repository of professional acting talent, with its roots primarily in scripted dramas (such as the 1990s soap opera Checkmate, starring Francis Agu), is not the same as that which would influence the billing of Nnenda. Nowadays, Nollywood producers are less likely to turn to local soap operas than to a plentiful crop of globally popular reality television programs in order to select some already-famous facesâsome widely publicized if relatively untested talents. In fact, Nollywoodâs growing reliance on reality television for a roster of ready-made stars has transformed the opening credit sequences of numerous films into promotions not simply for the stars themselves but also for the TV programs out of which they first emerged. Nwachukwu, Karen Igho, and Tonto Dikeh are three major Nigerian stars whose earliest Nollywood credits centralized their reality-TV credentials, often in openly celebratory ways. The 2008 film The Celebrity (Lancelot Oduwa Imasuen), for instance, features the following on-screen credit, stylized typographically through various fonts and colors, and ending in an exclamation mark: âIntroducing Ofunneka Molokwu of Big Brother Africa as Esther!â
If reality television, however widely consumed, is also, and simultaneously, widely denigrated throughout Nigeriaâa point that Wole Soyinka made in his extensive keynote speech at FESPACO in 2013âthen Nollywood producers would seem to be responding unapologetically to a pronounced popular appetite for the formatâs stars.6 Perhaps, in employing such hyper-bolically celebratory credits as the one quoted above, Nollywood films that rely upon reality-TV stars also work to defuse or preempt a public backlash, implanting the notion that such stars, whose names appear alongside those of the industryâs legendary leading lights, are themselves worthy of considerable esteem. But to what extent are they professional performers? With what thespian tools are they able to act for the camera? It has become increasingly difficult to argue that the star of a reality-television franchise like Big Brother is ever unaware of the mechanisms of the franchiseâs production and transnational dissemination. Indeed, the structures of monitoring that feature so prominently on Big Brother and that lend the franchise its name lead inevitably to contestants who âplay to the cameras,â but who also, as competitors, seek to out-act each other. This call to consciously perform was especially pronounced during Uti Nwachukwuâs season of Big Brother Africa, on which he was pitted against contestants from Ghana, Malawi, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Botswana, Zambia, Tanzania, Kenya, Ethiopia, Angola, and South Africa, each of whom sought to suppress a âpersonal secretâ as part of the seasonâs effort to further mystify the boundaries among a wide range of African national âtraits.â For Meryl Shikwambane, a South African contestant forced to feign a lack of worldliness (in alleged contrast to an âexpectedâ South African cosmopolitanism), that secret involved a steamy affair with an unnamed Namibian celebrity; for Tatiana Dos Santos Durao, a contestant from Angola, it entailed a refusal to reveal the extent of her singing talent, so that she could pass herself off as âsimpleâ and unaffected, and experientially far from the thriving popular cultures of her native Luanda.
Nwachukwu, for his part, attempted to hide his intense affection for Britney Spearsâa fandom that complicated his professed allegiance to the âpurityâ and singularity of southern Nigerian popular culture. As a Britney fan hailing from Lagos, Nwachukwu exemplified a reception practice that is transnational as well as transcultural. That it represented his mandated secret on Big Brother Africa suggests that it is still capable of surprising those with fixed notions of Nigerian national identity (and of associated local reception practices). If multiple modes of mobility are necessary for Nollywood stardom, then the hybridity of Nwachukwuâs fandomâthe devotion both to âNaija cultureâ as well as to Britney Spearsâwould seem to position him as being at least partly suited to a film industry so famously committed to expansive pop sensibilities. After all, Britney posters abound in Nollywood films, particularly in those that take place on university campuses and that feature aspirational young women who self-fashionâoften across strong national, ethnic, cultural, and class boundariesâwhile oversized images of the American pop star stare approvingly down at them. For instance, in JĂ©nĂfĂ (Muhydeen S. Ayinde, 2008), Funke Akindeleâs title character (nĂ©e Suliat), in attempting to transform herself from a strictly YorĂčbĂĄ-speaking ârazz village girlâ into a post-ethnic campus diva, finds a measure of inspiration in the Britney posters that adorn the walls of various dorm rooms, reflecting a relatively mutable American star persona (spanning Spearsâs somewhat discrepant adolescent, young-adult, and post-âmeltdownâ phases). In the case of Uti Nwachukwu, however, a real-life reliance on Britney Spears as a source of encouragement is not, in itself, enough to establish him as a Nollywood-style star, as the Nnenda credit controversy makes clear. There, the issue was less Nwachukwuâs reality-television originsâless his one-time role-playing âas himselfââthan his rĂ©sumĂ©âs restriction to Big Brother Africa. If his public persona has not yet undergone a series of shifts, it is due not to Nwachukwuâs refusal to âreinventâ it (Ă la the maneuverable Ms. Spears) but instead to the scarcity of his major film roles, a preponderance of which would, in the ever-evolving Nollywood, demand consistent refashioning.
BEYOND âMERE CELEBRITYâ: CONSTRUCTING CINEMA STARDOM
There are, according to clichĂ©, two types of film performersâthose who, like Nwachukwu, appear to play themselves, and those whose fame rests upon a capacity for change.7 In cinema studies, however, there is a strong yet surprisingly underexposed subfield devoted to bridging the gap between these two perceived types. It goes by the name âstar studies,â and its central tenets are as follows: film stardom is a discursive construction developed and maintained through a variety of semiotic means; an individual star persona is mutable (albeit in often subtle ways and regardless of personal or corporate protestations); and the operations of a so-called star system provide an important window through which to look not simply at a series of film texts but also at entire film industries.8 In Nollywood, some of the top stars might seem equally unalterable, enshrined in typecasting and consistently associated with the genres that they have helped to developâsuch as, in the case of Okereke, the lesbian-themed campus drama (in which young, female-identified university students explore same-sex desire).9 For Okerekeâan especially in-demand and relatively well-paid actressâthat genre represents only one facet of the kaleidoscopic Nollywood, whose producers, she maintains, ârewardâ her by permitting her to pursue a whole host of performance modes (from comedy to drama to just about every imaginable hybrid in between).10 Simply put, an industry as dizzyingly productive as Nollywood would seem to need a certain, stabilizing degree of standardization, but with productivity comes possibilityâinnumerable chances to change as a performer and to evolve as a star, even within seemingly fixed generic confines.
Perhaps no Nollywood star better exemplifies this expansive potential than Liz Benson. Mere months after starring in Glamour Girls, Benson rose to new prominence by playing three significantly discrepant roles in a single filmâChika Onukwuforâs 1995 melodrama True Confession, written and produced by Kenneth Nnebue. Bensonâs capacity to portray various ages, gender identities, and temperaments is characteristic of the talents of Nollywoodâs top stars; through Bensonâs performances True Confession offers a crucial distillation of the industryâs pronounced yet understudied openness to change. Stars literally embody this openness, physicalizing diverse aspirations and appearing as hypervisible ambassadors of adaptability. However, as Jonathan Haynes suggests, Nollywoodâs immense annual output both requires and is the direct result of an âimitative and genericâ process that Haynes, Onookome Okome, and Karin Barber have all linked to commercialized African popular arts in generalâto the precise material conditions that tend to prescribe standardization and repetition.11 Since star studies, as a discipline, endeavors to elucidate what Marsha Orgeron calls the âmultiple mediationsâ of stardomâincluding those that seem âunextraordinary, or even . . . shamefully unworthy,â such as salacious news items planted by producers for the purposes of publicityâit can serve, in the context of the seemingly monotonous Nollywood, to clarify the complex industrial permutations tha...