1
A Context for Composers
WITHIN THE NATURE-WRITING TRADITION
Until the 1980s, noted American women composers were few in number; their activities were limited in scope. Social mores and circumscribed educational opportunities had discouraged and denied womenâs pursuits of professional musical careers. The situation regarding women and music composition, in particular, differed from the long tradition of notable American women writers, and more particularly for purposes of this study, American women nature writers whose history of public participation went back to the earliest colonial times.
Inadequate or nonexistent musical education beyond that which guaranteed a desirable level of âaccomplishmentâ and limiting codes of behavior, which confined womenâs musical sphere to the home or school, meant that most aspiring American women composers prior to the twentieth century looked no further than parlor performances as sites for their original songs and piano pieces.1 Public performances that hinted at virtuosic displays would have been construed as unseemly and in certain circles would have drawn severe criticism and even censure.2 Like some of their literary counterpoints, women composers often kept their identities hidden with pen names, or at the very least disguised behind initials or the use of âMrs.â3 Prior to the closing decades of the nineteenth century, most American women with musical talent confined themselves to singing âsweetly,â or playing violin, organ, piano, or guitar and within a private sphere, often with a goal of attracting an appropriate mate and educating the resulting children.4
While womenâs literary and musical traditions differed in significant ways, including their duration and degree of public engagement, both developed within similar social circumstances. This chapter provides a context for the study of American women composers and their interactions with nature by considering some of the nationâs earliest women nature writers and the themes that dominated their works. It documents their desire for silence, solitude, and the opportunity to pursue their work, conditions that eluded many women. As becomes clear, the subject matter and perspective of the nationâs earliest women writers and composers have much in common.
In England, in 1650, the first book of poetry by an American author was published. Without her knowledge, Anne Bradstreetâs brother-in-law, John Woodbridge, had taken her writings with him when he sailed across the Atlantic.5 There they were published as The Tenth Muse Lately Sprung Up in America ⌠By a Gentlewoman in Those Parts; the book found its way to the library of King George III. Anticipating by a good seventy years the more famous writings in natural philosophy by Puritan theologians Cotton Mather and Jonathan Edwards, Anne Bradstreetâs Tenth Muse meditated on the deep connection that she perceived existed between nature and God. Appearing 186 years before Ralph Waldo Emersonâs 1836 essay âNature,â Bradstreet depicted nature as a moral text ripe with lessons to guide oneâs personal behavior. Over the next two centuries, women would become increasingly responsible for and identified with the moral instruction of the nation, as that duty was assigned to them and their sphere, the home. Women would use natureâs lessons to teach their families.
In 1704, Sarah Kemble Knight (Mrs. Richard Knight) traveled from Boston to New York, a distance of about 150 miles, to help a cousin.6 She did this with no single, steady companion, but with a series of hired guides to assist her passage over uneven countryside and swollen waterways. She recorded her alternately humorous, terrifying, and rapturous experiences in a book published posthumously in 1825 as The Journal of Madam Knight. Within its pages, an eighteen-line paean to the moon, that âBright Aspectâ who diffused Joy through [her] soul, aroused a more secular appreciation of nature than Bradstreet had expressed. While Sarah Knightâs journey without a proper escort â which according to social custom would have been a husband, brother, son, or other male relative â might suggest behavior far outside the norms of acceptability for respectable thirty-eight-year-old women at the time, her descriptions of the woods reveal what was then considered a suitable female sensibility. Mrs. Knight portrayed her unaccustomed natural surroundings as comfortable. She employed domestic imagery, which would become the standard vocabulary for women nature writers in the nineteenth century: âthe pleasant delusion of a Sumptuous city, filled with famous Buildings and churches, with their spiring steeples, Balconies, Galleries and I know not what.â7 Making the natural world home-like, with its balconies and galleries, or at least familiar, was commonplace for early American women nature writers, who seldom ranged far from their domiciles or towns. By drawing analogies between the potentially dangerous climes and domestic features, Knight claimed her right to be there: she stayed within her sphere, even if only rhetorically.
As the nation expanded, however, the nineteenth century saw the publication of a number of accounts by women who ventured from their northeastern birthplaces and went west to stay. Books by Caroline Kirkland, Margaret Fuller, Susan Fenimore Cooper, and Eliza Farnham reveal additional aspects of womenâs experiences with nature. Kirklandâs A New Home â Whoâll Follow? or Glimpses of Western Life by Mrs. Mary Clavers, an Actual Settler, published in 1839, is the story of the New York Cityâborn Caroline Matilda (Stansbury) Kirkland (Mary Clavers is a pseudonym) and her husband traveling by horse-drawn wagon to Michigan, which was then the edge of the frontier. Although she described a broad range of experiences, including fording treacherous bog holes, and the unusual practices associated with purchasing land and naming and constructing towns in the west, Kirkland focused on the domestic sphere, with its specific challenges to women and family life. While not primarily about nature or the spiritual or religious lessons it contained, the natural elements regularly informed and decided her actions, activities, and attitudes; like her predecessors, Kirkland wrote from a decidedly female perspective.
A more widely circulated account of a city-bred northeastern woman interacting with nature was Margaret Fullerâs Summer on the Lakes, in 1843. Fullerâs trip around the Great Lakes lasted only a few months, June 10 to September 19, 1843, so the author did not develop the emic perspective achieved by Kirkland during her eight-year residence in the frontier. But she too used the physical journey to meditate on social issues and explore more interior landscapes. The book became, in Susan Belasco Smithâs words, âan expression of self-discovery.â8
Like Sarah Kemble Knight, Fuller was often transfixed by the beauty of nature; this is nowhere more evident than in her description of the start of her journey at Niagara Falls, considered at the time to be the nationâs most famous natural phenomenon and the symbol of American power and promise. While she despaired that her own reactions to the cataract were thoroughly influenced by those who had already captured it in prose and pictures, and thus denied their full originality, Fuller achieved a personal, epiphanic moment during an uncommon solitary moonlight visit to the falls. Her description reflects the easy blending of nature with spirituality characteristic of many women nature writers and more generally of the Transcendentalist group, of which she was a prominent member.
I felt a foreboding of a mightier emotion to rise up and swallow all others, and I passed on to the terrapin bridge. Everything was changed, the misty apparition had taken off its many-colored crown which it had worn by day, and a bow of silvery white spanned its summit. The moonlight gave a poetical indefiniteness to the distant parts of the waters, and while the rapids were glancing in her beams, the river below the falls was black as night, save where the reflection of the sky gave it the appearance of a shield of blued steel. No gaping tourists loitered, eyeing with their glasses, or sketching on cards the hoary locks of the ancient river god. All tended to harmonize with the natural grandeur of the scene. I gazed long. I saw how here mutability and unchangeableness were united. I surveyed the conspiring waters rushing against the rocky ledge to overthrow it at one mad plunge, till, like topping ambition, oâerleaping themselves, they fall on tâother side, expanding into foam ere they reach the deep channel where they creep submissively away.
Then arose in my breast a genuine admiration, and a humble adoration of the Being who was the architect of this and of all. Happy were the first discoverers of Niagara, those who could come unawares upon this view and upon that, whose feelings were entirely their own.9
Fuller revels in her personal, individual, solitary encounter with nature writ large.10 The extreme rarity of such experiences for women, especially in relation to grand, iconic natural phenomena such as Niagara Falls, undoubtedly fueled the passion of Fullerâs reaction. Women were more often members of large parties of tourists on grand tours of natural wonders who came weighted down with Claude glasses, portable easels, picnic hampers, and pets. The opportunity to interact solitarily with a site of such unique power and beauty was of incalculable importance to Fuller. The experience was hers. As readers will discover, more than one composer in this study has sought out similarly unaccompanied interactions with the natural world. With the urging and intercession of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Fuller turned her journey into her first book.
Women writers continued to acknowledge natureâs moral, spiritual, and aesthetic qualities, although practical exigencies associated with the nationâs western expansion encouraged additional insights and understanding. Eliza Farnhamâs Life in Prairie Land from 1846 is a third midcentury chronicle of womenâs experiences of the enlarging nation. Moving from her New York home, Farnham lived along the Illinois River in Tazewell County, Illinois, for nearly five years in the mid-1830s. Her account, simultaneously realistic and romantic, benefits from the sobering experiences of extended time spent in an often unforgiving landscape. Farnham, who would become one of the first and most effective advocates of equality for women, was especially aware of the challenges the West presented to her sex, and she attributed many of them to inadequate education and social constraints: âVery many ladies are so unfortunate as to have had their minds thoroughly distorted from all true and natural modes of action by an artificial and pernicious course of education, or the influence of a false social position. They cannot endure the sudden and complete transition which is forced upon them by emigration to the West.â11
Her real-life informed pragmatism, however, did not prevent Farnham from appreciating the inherent beauty of her surroundings. While avoiding the religious overtones of Fullerâs prose, Farnham captured the unique landscape of Tazewell County. The final passage from part 2, chapter 2 shows the author responding to the variety of this prairie place:
The great road from the northern to the southern extremities of the state passes, for the most part, over large prairies. These are sometimes divided by groves two or three miles in extent, sometimes by open, sparsely timbered tracts, called barrens, and sometimes by a mere thread of timber, towering above the swelling plain, showing a dark green line at the distance of miles, the first glimpse of which often elicits a cheerful âland hoâ from travelers who are unaccustomed to these long voyages by terra firma. This road intersects at Peoria the Illinois river, with which it runs nearly parallel for sixty or seventy miles, at a distance varying from four to eight, ten, and fifteen miles from the stream. The wood which crowns the bluffs of the stream stretches back at frequent intervals in long lines, and fringes the plains over which the road passes. These groves are generally very beautiful. They are usually seen on the high swells of the prairies, their outlines clearly defined on the horizon, long before you reach them. Their edges are bordered with the plum, hazel, and other fruit-bearing trees, and shrubs, which are frequented by birds, hares, squirrels, et cet. The music, life, and freshness of these woodlands, together with their utility to the husbandmen, led the early settlers to select them as the sites of their new homes. There the cabin was laid up under the spreading boughs of the outermost trees; and there the hardy frontiersman placed his family, remote from every artificial means of comfort, âalone with nature,â rich, beautiful, majestic, nature in the silent prairie land.12
Farnham sees the woods as crowning and fringing the plains. She construes the landscape as ârich, beautiful [and] majesticâ and takes aesthetic pleasure in its âmusic, life, and freshness.â In the context of her values, Farnhamâs distance from artificial comforts and solitary communion with nature in âthe silent prairie landâ has become a desirable condition. Eight years later, Henry David Thoreau would similarly plump the benefits of a wide margin between oneself and softening comforts. The inadequately educated ladies referred to in her preface, however, would likely have thought otherwise.
Back in the Northeast, in 1850, two hundred years after Bradstreetâs Tenth Muse and four years before Thoreauâs Walden, Susan Fenimore Cooper wrote Rural Hours, âa record of our simple rural life.â13 Thoreau read her book, referred to it in his journal, and perhaps even used parts of it as models for his own record of time âalone, in the woods.â14 Like Walden, which would focus on Thoreauâs stay at his cabin by the eponymous pond in Concord, Massachusetts, Rural Hours explored the natural world of Susan Cooperâs hometown, the one founded by her grandfather William Cooper, the one now famous for its Baseball Hall of Fame: Cooperstown, New York.
Thoreau would pond...