THE PICTURE HAS BEEN CALLED THE MOST LIFELIKE OF ALL THE MOZART PORTRAITS
MOZART
IN 1899, ALMA MAHLER, shortly before she married Gustav, went to a concert at which Mozartâs Jupiter Symphony was performed and âgot frightfully boredâ. She added: âI felt it wasnât exciting but merely long-drawn-out. Times have changed. Nowadays nobody wants such hyper-naĂŻve themes.â1 The young lady, a very talented musician, had fallen into a familiar trap. Because Mozartâs music is so easy to listen to, and often so light, we can easily think of him largely as a composer of background music fitted to complement champagne and strawberries at a fĂȘte cham-pĂȘtre, or to relax one when waiting for an aeroplane to take off.
Mozartâs lightheartedness and his âinexhaustible capacity for loveâ2 enabled his music to transcend the seriousness of his personal struggle. Yet, we should not think of him as a mere adjunct to powdered wigs, silk stockings, flunkeys and marzipan. Mozart could âlook straight into the human heartâ.3 In that sense, he was like Rembrandt, although the painter preceded the composer by more than a century.
It can be instructive to join Mozart and Rembrandt in the same sentence, however much it may seem odd to do so: for it can remind us that, until Mozart, probably no composer conveyed such deep perception. In his operas, for the first time we meet and hear people as they are, not as they ought to be. They express themselves from the bottom of their hearts. The conductor Bruno Walter, who recognised âbehind a seemingly graceful playfulness, the dramatistâs inexorable seriousness and wealth of characterizationâ, called Mozart âthe Shakespeare of the operaâ.4 It was through his music that Mozart achieved this: âthe drama is there only to give music opportunities; it is absorbed and completely recast in the music which remains supremeâ.5
Mozartâs achievement was astonishing; we have entered a new world. If one compares his operas with Gluckâs Orfeo, performed only 24 years before, much of it suited to the plangent tones of the castrato, the contrast is almost incredible.* Possibly Mozartâs struggle to be the first freelance musician gave him a deeper insight into human behaviour than others possessed. Others too have had âa hard timeâ, but who has produced compositions of the same quality or which give such pleasure? Try to compile a list of âhighlightsâ from Figaro or Don Giovanni. What will you leave out?
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozartâs short life of almost 36 years began in Salzburg, on 27 January 1756. He was, famously, the infant prodigy whose cash flow potential had to be maximised before he grew up and ceased to be a novelty. This meant relentless touring as a small child, first to Munich and Vienna, and then away on a three-and-a-half-year trip to Paris and London. After this, he went three times to Italy. The circus act was soon played out; he was soon regarded as just another professional in the market for a job.
He was desperate to break away from the confines of the typical âmusician in serviceâ, but his timing was wrong, and the circumstances were particularly inhospitable. He had a disastrous attempt at finding a job in southern Germany, and also in Paris, which was more interested in arguments about different types of opera than in him. After kicking his heels for a couple of years, he went to Vienna. Although supported by Emperor Joseph, the Viennese aristocracy found his music puzzling and disliked, one guesses, his character, his bumptious, boasting manner. His position cannot have been helped by a âbadâ marriage. For some reason, he seems always to have been broke, despite working himself to exhaustion. There have been many rumours as to why he died so young, one of which is portrayed in the drama by Peter Shaffer, Amadeus. Here, we can only touch on this conundrum.
EARLY DAYS IN SALZBURG
Salzburg, one of the most beautiful cities of Europe, mixes German earnestness and Italian brilliance. Until Napoleonic times, its population of 16,000 was ruled by the Roman Catholic prince-archbishop. He was a prelate of considerable importance because his principality and the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperor were mutually dependent on each other for support. The Archbishopâs revenues, principally from the salt industry, enabled him to sustain a court with a chief minister, master of the horse, lord steward, lord chamberlain, lord marshal, cupbearer, lords of the bedchamber plus 22 canons, all counts or lords.6
Salzburg was then a city of contrasts. The archbishopâs palace was âmagnificent, abounding with fine pictures, tables of inlaid marble, and superb stoves of all colours and ornamented with statues ⊠In the menagery are to be seen some cranes, a pelican, which is in effect nothing but a kind of bittern, with a large bag at his throat, in which he can lay up a store of provision. There are also rock eagles, lynxes and two bevers.â7 The Getreidegasse, where Wolfgang was born, was in the narrow streets. Here a nightwatchman kept law and order and called out the hours. The house would have been pervaded with smells from the earth closet, which led into a cesspit in the courtyard; the street reeked from the sewer running down the middle, the Salzach River stank from the filth thrown in. These smells had the merit of concealing the odour of the people who never washed, but rubbed themselves clean and occasionally doused themselves with perfume. On Saturdays, garbage was removed: the canal sluices were opened and the Getreidegasse was flooded.8
The people of Salzburg were notable beer-drinkers, but were not particularly prosperous. The cityâs resources had been depleted by the expulsion of its Protestant population in the 1730s.9 Crop failures and the Seven Years War had also led to inflation, which had weakened the economy.
Leopold Mozart, the son of a bookbinder, had moved to Salzburg from Augsburg, some twenty years before his son was born. He was employed first as a valet and musician to one of the canons and then in the Archbishopâs court, where he progressed to become deputy Kapellmeister. Unlike his son, he was a thrifty administrator; he might even have made a good accountant. But he was also a skilled musician.10 His most famous piece, the Toy Symphony, was long attributed to Haydn.11 He was also the author of a textbook on violin playing, which remained a respected primer for almost a century.12 He handled all the marketing of this himself: he kept a stock at home; periodically he sent copies to German booksellers.
The court music department naturally swarmed with intrigue and gossip.13 It was dominated by Italians, who came and went. Sometimes they left the local girls pregnant â surprisingly perhaps, since the Salzburg government determined the clothing one had to wear in bed, the bedclothes one could have, the times of getting up, and at what age one might share a bedroom with oneâs children. The day-to-day work in the music department was done by Germans such as Leopold and Haydnâs brother Michael, who was despised as a tippler. Leopold wanted the top job, but there was as much chance of that as of a German being appointed head chef.
Leopoldâs wife Maria Anna was a local girl, the daughter of an impecunious widow who supplemented her income by lace making, the traditional means whereby impoverished, but respectable, widows eked out an existence.14 The Mozarts had seven children. Only Maria Anna âjuniorâ, known as Nannerl, and Wolfgang, who was four and a half years younger, survived.
From the age of three, Wolfgang (Wolferl, as his family called him) dabbled on the clavier. He progressed fast: when he was five, he composed a minuet and trio; by the time he was seven, he also played the violin.15 Musical prodigies were not wholly unusual. To the considerable benefit of her fatherâs teaching practice, Hetty Burney, the doctorâs eleven-year-old daughter, had played complex Scarlatti harpsichord pieces on the London stage only three years before the Mozarts appeared in London.16 Twenty years after Mozart, J.N. Hummel read music at four, played the violin at five, and the piano at six. There were others, now forgotten, including Nannerl herself. The poet and playwright Goethe suggested that instrumental skills could develop much earlier than literary or other artistic ability, because âmusic is something innate and internal, which needs little nourishment from without, and no experience from lifeâ.17 The ultimate test is whether the child possessing those early mechanical and aural skills actually matures into an artist. Most do not.
ON THE ROAD
Prodigies open up all sorts of commercial possibilities for promoters. Wolfgang made his first appearance in September 1761 at Salzburg University, before he was six. In January, he was whisked off to Munich, 90 miles away, where he played before Elector Maximilian Joseph. One can imagine the family discussions during the subsequent months, as they planned an autumn visit to Vienna. On 18 September 1762, they set out, probably down river, to join the Danube at Passau.18 Wolfgang played before the prince bishop, but was only given a few florins. This stinginess disappointed Leopold. How he coped with the continual stress of waiting for flunkeys to arrive with a bag of gold, we do not know. But he was a good man genuinely devoted to his childrenâs best interests. Success for Wolfgang could eventually provide a good marriage for Nannerl, without which she would be doomed to an impoverished future.
Leopold wrote regularly to his landlord, Lorenz Hagenauer. Not only did he want to get news of his children back to Salzburg: Hagenauer, a successful grocer, was his banker, and âhad connections as far as Hamburg, Rotterdam, Marseilles and Veniceâ.19 He provided the Mozarts with letters of credit which enabled them to draw cash in distant places. If Hagenauer had no direct trading contact at their next destination, the initial credit could be extended by a letter from the first contact to a further business acquaintance. The debts then bounced back to Hagenauer along the mercantile credit network.20 It is important to impress oneâs banker; and Leopold usually put a good spin on what he said.
The Mozarts travelled on down the Danube, possibly in one of those well-appointed boats, âhaving in them all the conveniences of a palace, stoves in the chambers, kitchens etc.â,21 rowed by twelve men, which went down the river at high speed. At Linz, the powerful Count Palffy heard the Mozarts play, and passed on news about them to Archduke Joseph (as Emperor Joseph II was then). The archduke asked his mother to invite the Mozarts to appear at the palace at Schönbrunn.
They arrived in Vienna some two and a half weeks after they had set out. Then they performed before the Imperial Vice-Chancellor: Leopold played the violin, Nannerl played the clavier and sang, while Wolfgang, with fingers spanning only five keys and feet not touching the ground, played the clavier and the violin.* Leopold wrote back, as one might expect, âAll the ladies are in love with my boyâ.23
A few days later, they appeared at Schönbrunn, the first of two visits there, and they also played at the Hofburg, the imperial palace in Vienna. The empress, who only a week earlier had heard the first performance of Gluckâs Orfeo ed Euridice, was musical,** like her ancestors. She played the clavier and had been taught singing by Hasse, the leading opera composer of his day. When she was young, the Italian castrato Senesino was, sensibly no doubt, reduced to tears by her singing.24
But she was tough. Only a couple of years before, the Prussians were winning the wars against her, there was administrative chaos, and her treasury was nearly bankrupt; her son and heir called their position âterrifyingâ. She was practical: her criterion for whether an altarpiece was good was whether it was easy to dust.25 She was also matronly: in the nineteen years before Mozartâs birth she had borne sixteen children, the youngest a future Archbishop-Elector of Cologne, being about Wolfgangâs own age.
She allowed the children to romp together; Wolfgang jumped up on the empressâ lap and kissed her, fell on the floor and was picked up by Archduchess Marie Antoinette, who was about a year older than him. Wolfgang commanded the distinguished composer Wagenseil, who was in attendance on the empress, to turn the pages for him.26 Poisonous child.
We may surmise that the empress felt that Wolfgang would help to keep her children entertained for that afternoon. Afterwards, she sent him one of their cast-off coats, lilac and gold, which would have been very expensive to acquire; the emperor sent Leopold 100 ducats, the equivalent of about fourteen and a half monthsâ salary. The coat was worn by Wolfgang when he performed; the money was deposited in Hagenauerâs bank account in Vienna.
Presumably, it was later that the empress formed her devastating dislike of the Mozarts. Eight years later, she would discourage one of her sons from taking Wolfgang into his service, saying: âIf however it would give you pleasure, I have no wish to stop you. I just want to prevent you burden ing yourself with useless people and giving titles to people of that sort. If they are in your service, it degrades that service when these people go about the world like beggars.â She added a telling comment in times when courts found that they could be burdened with dependants: âBesides he has a large family.â27 âThumbs downâ from Empress Maria Theresa was likely to be disastrous.
After the royal performances, Leopold experienced a serious hitch: Wolfgang was covered in spots. The cash flow stopped; but thankfully he recovered. They travelled on to Pressburg (now Bratislava) where Leopold could buy himself a four-seater coach, a sign of considerable upward momentum, even if horizontally, as we shall see, it was to be rather less effective. They left for Salzburg on New Yearâs Eve, having done some more performances in Vienna. We can picture the proud Leopold, as he drew up in the tiny square in the Getreidegasse in his new coach.28
MORETH...