CHAPTER 1
The Million-Dollar Question
The first step in finding your financing comfort zone is to stop what you are doing and answer a challenging question.
Are you investing enough in your business? Does your business have enough capital to keep moving forward? Sometimes we need a tough question to shake up our thinking and challenge our routines.
Imagine that I presented you with a gift of $1 million. The one rule about the gift is that you cannot use it to buy a new house or a fancy car. You must invest it in your business or the mutual fund of your choice.
How would you divide the money, and what return would you expect from each investment?
HOW WOULD YOU INVEST YOUR NEXT $1 MILLION?
Step 1âHow much $ will I invest in:
| $ |
My Business |
| $ |
Mutual Fund |
Step 2âExpected return from investment:
| % |
My Business |
| % |
Mutual Fund |
How you answer the question says a lot about how you feel about your business and whether you would try to expand if you had access to additional capital. Your response also speaks to what stage of life you are in, and whether you feel you canâand whether itâs important toâdiversify some of your risks and invest in things outside your business.
What return would you expect from your investment in the business and mutual fund? And what would you do with the money you put into your company? You might use it for additional sales staff, product development, acquisition, equipment, advertising, and so on.
If you expect a handsome return on your business investment and you have the option to raise equity or debt to make it happen, why arenât you doing it?
Asking yourself the million-dollar question is important for several reasons. If youâre currently building and running a business, there are three things you can do with your next available dollar: You can spend it on something fun, you can reinvest it in your business, orâwhen you can afford toâyou can take some chips off the table and diversify your risk. Often, we do not make these decisions thoughtfully and methodically.
You may be thinking about reinvesting in your business only through cash flow. If the returns are substantial and you are bullish on the prospects, adding debt (or perhaps equity) to your balance sheet may well be worth it.
ARE THESE DECISIONS EMOTIONAL OR RATIONAL?
While itâs easy to create spreadsheets and models to make these decisions, the reality is that emotional components also enter into our thinking about money and risk.
Let me share an example.
Years ago, I had a client who ran a commercial cleaning company. We offered him a ten-year Small Business Administration (SBA) loan at a 6 percent interest rate that required a lien on his house. The other option was a one-year term loan at 36 percent without a lien on his house. He chose the latter. He had a past personal experience that led him to decide that, come hell or high water, he wasnât going to put a lien on his house.
Unfortunately, the short-term debt he chose caught up with him, and years later his business was in serious trouble. My client let the memory of a past event completely cloud the present in a way that ultimately harmed his business. Think about your prior experiences and how they influence the way you currently think about money and risk.
I know that having to watch the company where Iâd worked for a decade completely blow up, with a thousand people losing their jobs, impacted how I think about risk and leverage. I am much happier letting my company grow slowly and organically, although I certainly risked everything to get it off the ground.
How do your past experiences impact the way you think about your million-dollar decision?
PROFILE: âCOREPHPâ
As you can imagine, entrepreneurs answer the million-dollar question in many different waysâoften with more emotion than a rational method. Michael Pignataro has, in my opinion, the most methodical answer to the million-dollar question of any entrepreneur profiled in this book.
As someone who once worked as a professional illusionist, Michael Pignataro knows how quickly moneyâamong other thingsâcan disappear. But thatâs not why, if he were given $1 million he could divide in any proportion between âcorePHP,â which he co-owns with his identical twin, Steven, and a mutual fund, he would only put 80 percent in âcorePHP.â
In 2001, Michaelâs twin founded the software development company âcorePHP,â which was originally based in Battle Creek, Michigan, and now also has an office in SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil. As its name suggests, its initial focus was the PHP programming language, which it originally used to create custom content-management systems. Prior to âcorePHP,â Steven Pignataro had helped develop two open-source content-management systems: Mambo and one of its successors, Joomla!, which âcorePHPâ still uses in web development.
Before they became business partners, Steven and Michael were performing as illusionists doing large-scale magic showsâuntil demand for the shows dropped off dramatically before the 2008 economic crash, causing them to cancel a tour while in the middle of it.
After getting off the road, Steven made âcorePHPâ a limited liability company (LLC) with a business partner, and Michael went to work for a credit union. But when Steven wanted to ramp up the growth of âcorePHPâ and his partner didnât, Michael borrowed money and bought out the partner.
Since then, âcorePHPâ has developed an e-commerce platform for businesses called paGO Commerce. The company offers the platform for free, but users pay a small percentage on all customer transactions they conduct on it. Additionally, âcorePHPâ offers development and marketing services to their paGo business clients and other businesses.
Michael said that after a few years of putting all his potential investment money into âcorePHP,â he wants to get back to the rule heâs followed over the years, putting 80 percent of his available money into the business and 20 percent into other investments.
Although he would use the mutual fund for security, Michael would expect his investment in âcorePHPâ to generate a return about 10 percent higher than the return generated by the mutual fund. The reason, he said, is that he expects that heâd be more focused on growing âcorePHPâ than the managers of the mutual fund would be on growing the fund.
Michael said âcorePHPâ is in the process of forming a joint venture to take paGO from being just an e-commerce platform to being a sales and marketing tool that will help its users increase their revenue. He expected âcorePHPâ to have 2016 revenue of $1.2 million if it landed a couple of jobs that were pending when I interviewed him, and $1 million to $1.1 million if it didnât. He also expected the company to be profitable.
His plans for the hypothetical $800,000 heâd invest in âcorePHPâ? His first priority would be boosting its marketing and sales efforts. His second priority would be to continue developing and enhancing paGO so that it not only exceeds the demands of current âcorePHPâ customers but ultimately reshapes the market for e-commerce platforms. The money would give âcorePHPâ âthe ability to scale faster than weâre scaling right now.â
On the other hand, when asked if heâd want to borrow $1 million at 6 percent interest, Michael said he probably wouldnât want the entire amount. His reason? Heâd want to make sure the company could start paying back the loan right away, which it might not be able to do because of the revenue lag involved with paGO. âcorePHPâ doesnât get money when businesses sign up to use the platform; it only profits when those businessesâ customers start buying on the platform. Thus, it could run a marketing campaign that succeeded in bringing a lot of companies onto paGO without seeing much revenue from the effort for a few months. âWhen youâre dealing with e-commerce, thereâs a ramp-up when users come on board.â
REFLECTION
Unlike most entrepreneurs Iâve met and worked with, Michael has a methodical formula for deciding how much money to keep in and take out.
Do you have such a formula? If you donât, itâs something to seriously consider.
CHAPTER 2
100 Percenters vs. Safety Netters
The entrepreneurs profiled in this book fit into one of two categoriesâ100 percenters and safety netters.
The 100 percenters are those entrepreneurs who, when offered $1 million (whether as a gift or at a 6 percent interest rate) said they would, without hesitation, plunk it all down on their business.
The safety netters, on the other hand, were a bit more cautious. While they said they would invest most of the $1 million into their businesses, they all pledged to hold back varying amounts as a reserve.
But which approach is the right one?
Ultimately, you can make an argument that either approach is correct. It all depends upon intestinal fortitude, confidence, and personal preference.
It makes sense that many entrepreneurs fall into the 100 percenters category. To be an entrepreneur, you have to dream big, be willing to take risks, and have a high degree of confidence both in yourself and your business.
Hereâs a golf analogy that can shed light on this. Say youâre on the green, about fifteen feet from the hole.
A cautious golfer might tap the ball too lightly which, in turn, means it cannot reach the cup.
A bold golfer will hit the ball harder. It may not go inâand it may go past the holeâbut at least thereâs a chance it will go in.
In other words, if you arenât willing to take a risk (that the ball goes past the cup), thereâs no chance you can succeed (sink the putt).
Put many entrepreneurs on the golf course, and itâs safe to say their putts arenât coming up short.
The confidence that 100 percenters express is appealing to some lenders, who want potential clients to believe in their businesses. Thatâs the kind of mindset lenders can get behind.
Now letâs look at the safety netters.
Obviously, there are some sound reasons for being at least somewhat cautious. An entrepreneur who would only invest $800,000 of the $1 million from our example, leaving a $200,000 cushion, is far from gun-shy.
An entrepreneur might have all the confidence in the world in their business, but they c...