2 The test of letter combinations as an initiation ceremony
Rabbi Nachman of Tcherin (1825â1894), a prolific Bratslav author and one of the central figures of the third generation of Bratslav Hasidism, quotes the following words of Rabbi Nachman of Bratslav.
I heard from R. Dovid Tzvi that he heard from his grandfather, R. Yishaya Shalom (may his memory be for a blessing) that once our rebbe (may his memory be for a blessing) spoke as follows:
I was someplace where I was invited to read (in Yiddish: leinen)âin other words, I [was asked to] recite the letter combinations of the entire Torah, from bereishit [âin the beginning, â the first word of the Pentateuch] to lâeinei kol Yisrael [âin the eyes of all Israel,â the last phrase of the Pentateuch] âŚ
After I performed this leinen, I was given another leinen to do: to recite the letter combinations in tashrak [backwards form], from lâeinei kol Yisrael to bereishit. And I performed this leinen as well.
After that, the Torah was divided into two parts, with the second part of the Torah first and the first part second, and I was told to recite the letter combinations [of that]. But I was unable to do so, and I felt deeply ashamedâlike a good boy who is given [a text] to read and cannot do so, and people are standing there, [before whom] he feels ashamed [in Yiddish: azoi vi men git a gut yungel a leinen un er ken nit, un se shtein derbei mentshen, hot er bushah].
I recalled that as soon [as a person perceives] that something is lacking [in himself], that [indicates that] something is lacking [in the realm of Godliness] [in Yiddish: hab ikh mikh dermant vi bald chesaron, iz zikh a chesaron]. [And that is true] whether [a personâs imperfection expresses itself] in physical or in spiritual matters.
And that is [the meaning of the phrase,] âYou made [man] a little less than Godâ [Psalms 8:6].
[At that point,] I could not serve the Lord joyfully [in Yiddish: hab ikh nit gekant dinen lâHashem Yisborach besimchah]. So I thought, Who am I [in Yiddish: hab ikh zikh meyashev geven, ver bin ikh] that the King Himself should tell me what He lacks, as it were? Is there a greater honor than that? And from that [thought] itself, I attained great joy.
And that [is alluded to in the words,] âYou crown him with honor and splendorâ [ibid.], [which refer to] âa new state of consciousnessâ [literally, âbrainsâ]. And then I performed that leinen.
This leinen that Rabbi Nachman performed may be regarded as a sort of initiation ceremony, a rite of passage that tested the level of his expertise in combining letters of the Torah.
Although leinen literally means âreading,â it also has the meaning of âa reading test.â As will be shown later on, Rabbi Nachman himself used the expression leinen in that sense.
This test is based on a pattern of traditional Jewish educational practices and childrenâs initiation ceremonies.
There exist testimonies to the effect that as far back as Talmudic times a teacher would begin his instruction by teaching his pupils to recite the alphabet. First they would recite the alphabet forwards, then backwards, and finally in atbash formâi.e., the first letter paired with the last, the second letter with the second-to-last, and so forth.
The description of Rabbi Akivaâs first steps in learning Torah, when he joined a class of school children, may be referring to this custom: âImmediately, [Rabbi Akiva] went with his son, and they sat with the school teachers. [Rabbi Akiva] said to [the teacher]: Rabbi, teach me Torah. Rabbi Akiva took hold of one end of the [writing] board. [The teacher] wrote alef bet [the first two letters of the alphabet] for [Rabbi Akiva] and he learned it. [The teacher then wrote] alef tav [the first and last letters of the alphabet] and he learned that ⌠[Rabbi Akiva] learned and made progress until he learned the entire Torah.â
In later eras as well, this recitation of the alphabet forwards and backwards served as a component in initiation ceremonies that introduced a child to the world of Torah learning. When the child was taken for the first time from his home to the study hall or to his teacherâs home, his family would accompany him in a joyful, festive parade. In the teacherâs home a ceremony was arranged that included, among other things, the reading of letters. It is reasonable to assume that Rabbi Nachman recognized the echoes of this custom from the Talmud and other sources. Possibly, this custom was still in existence in some form in his own lifetime, whether in the way that children began to learn or as a component of a test that served as an initiation ceremony for the young pupil.
In this context, when Rabbi Nachman states that he was asked to perform a leinen of letters, he is describing himself as a child engaged in an educational ceremony. This idea is reinforced by the fact that when Rabbi Nachman mentions the shame of his failure, he offers the analogy of a child who, in the presence of adults, is asked to engage in a ritualistic reading (leinen), and whose failure to do so shames him.
Before addressing the nature of this leinen, I will examine other episodes in which Rabbi Nachman engaged in a leinen. Avaneha Barzel relates that in his youth Rabbi Nachman concealed his greatness to such an extent that even his father-in-law, in whose house he lived, had no conception of his attainments:
Once one of the Maggidâs disciples stayed with [Rabbi Nachmanâs father-in-law. The father-in-law told the student] of his sorrow that he had taken a descendant of the Baal Shem Tov to be his son-in-law, but [this descendant] did not learn [any Torah] at all and there was no doubt that he had even forgotten Hebrew.
The guest said that this was certainly not the case, because he was afraid to say anything against a descendant of the Baal Shem Tov.
But [Rabbi Nachmanâs] father-in-law insisted until the guest told him, âIn that case, I will give him a leinen.â
He began to test [Rabbi Nachman] on the mishnah, âThe dog and the kid that jumped from the topâmeiroshâof the roof.â [Rabbi Nachman] began by saying, âThe dog and the kid that jumpedâmarshâŚ,â and the guest grew very embarrassed.
[Rabbi Nachmanâs] father-in-law told [the guest], âDidnât I tell you that he has even forgotten HebrewâŚ?â
Afterwards, [the guest] came upon [Rabbi Nachman] alongside the wall of the house when they were alone.
He asked him, âIs such a thing possible? Arenât you a descendant of the Baal Shem Tov and of Rabbi Nachman of Horodenka? Your father-in-law liberally gave a vast dowry because of [your] pedigree, yet you do not learn [any Torah] at all, to the point that you have even forgotten Hebrew.â And as he said these words, he slapped [Rabbi Nachman in the] face twice.
The leinen here is not administered as part of a celebratory initiation ceremony, but in order to test the youthâs knowledge of Mishnah and Hebrew. Here Rabbi Nachmanâs failure is accompanied by the shame that the guest experiences as he is confronted with the ignorance of the Baal Shem Tovâs great-grandson.
Avaneha Barzel also describes a later episode in Rabbi Nachmanâs life, in which he engages in a leinen:
One time [Rabbi Nachman] was staying with his uncle Rabbi Borukh. His uncle delivered a teaching, but [Rabbi Nachman] was not impressed by his teaching, and this was related to the rabbi, Rabbi Borukh.
Rabbi Borukh said, âAnd if someone cannot deliver a teaching, is he not a guter yidâa âgood Jewâ? After all, the Maggid of Mezeritch did not know the meaning of left-handednessâso was he no longer a guter yid?â
Hearing this, [Rabbi Nachman] said, âThis means that I am being given a leinen, for I need to know what left-handedness is.â
Shortly thereafter, he delivered [Likutei Moharan I,] Teaching 66, which speaks about left-handedness.
In this story too the leinen is a challenge and testâhowever, this time not to a youth but to a rebbe who is contending for the title of guter yid, qualified to teach Torah. Rabbi Borukhâs statement that the Maggid of Mezeritch did not know what left-handedness is and thus could not deliver a teaching about it challenged Rabbi Nachman, who felt that âI am being given a leinenâ and hastened to demonstrate that he was qualified to deliver a teaching even on the topic of left-handedness.
Now I will return to the story that is the focus of the present discussion, and attempt to clarify the meaning of the leinen that Rabbi Nachman underwent. The following...