1
CALLS FOR ACTION
POEMS THAT OVERTLY state their intent to rouse support for the cause are among the most persuasive and compelling in the abolitionist corpus. They demonstrate the vehement commitment of their authors, at times to such a radical extent that it becomes clear why their opponents frequently referred to them as âfanatics.â The imperative tone that characterizes these poems conveys the strong sense of urgency and persistence their authors felt the need to express in the face of heavy opposition. Also apparent is a deep confidence in the potential influence of poetry, which, as the author of âAn Appeal to Poetsâ asserts, can extend even further than the law in its ability to expose truth and plead for justice on behalf of those who are unable to speak for themselves. The influence that literature could have is corroborated by the sonnet âReading âUncle Tom,ââ whose author composed it after reading Harriet Beecher Stoweâs seminal 1852 novel Uncle Tomâs Cabin, which he claims increased his empathy for slaves as well as his commitment to the cause of justice. It is precisely this sort of outcome that poets hoped to elicit in readers by persuading them to commit to what this poem calls âthe task through sympathy to grow more wise,â which would then presumably compel them to support abolition. That literature could indeed be persuasive was recognized as early as 1836, when the American Anti-Slavery Societyâs publishing agent, R. G. Williams, observed that âthe press has probably made seven-eighths of all the abolitionists in the country.â1
These calls for action commonly rely on the tactic of suggesting that a failure to get involved is in itself tantamount to a form of slavery. For instance, the well-known Boston minister John Pierpont accuses all Americans of being slaves and challenges them to prove they are not in âThe Tocsin,â a title which in this case means âthe alarm.â2 The poem sounds a virtual alarm that is intended to âWake!â readers out of their complacency. As the editorial note preceding it makes clear, it was reprinted in the Herald of Freedom four years after its original publication as a commentary on recent attempts to suppress antislavery activities. The note acknowledges the assassination of abolitionist publisher Elijah P. Lovejoy in November 1837 (see chapter 2); the rioters whose opposition to the Second Anti-Slavery Convention of American Women scheduled to be held in Philadelphia in May 1838 led to the destruction of the Pennsylvania Anti-Slavery Societyâs headquarters at Pennsylvania Hall (see plate 1); and the riot that disrupted an August 1842 convention in Nantucket following an inflammatory speech in which Stephen Symonds Foster denounced the clergy as a âbrotherhood of thievesâ who were colluding with businessmen and politicians to preserve slavery.3 Pierpontâs jeremiad targets this supposed brotherhood, as well as the press, for their failure to oppose slavery. He insists that while such voices may be constrained, poetic expression like his cannot be suppressed, defiantly calling on anyone who has been silenced and is therefore âat Slaveryâs beckâ to âProve that ye are not Slaveryâs slaves!â The popular poet James Russell Lowell, a member of the so-called Fireside Poets, makes a similar point in his âStanzas on Freedom,â one of three poems by him included in this chapter. Lowell suggests that readers are mistaken in believing they are free while slavery continues to exist unless they are themselves contributing to the cause of universal freedom, whether it is popular or not. This message is reiterated in the provocatively titled poem âWho Is the Slave?,â which claims that the true slaves are those who fail to speak out against slavery, and motivates those who persist in doing so not to falter in their efforts.
Prior to the Civil War, poets adopted a variety of approaches to capture their readersâ attention. James Stillman memorably portrays slavery as a disease, or âplague spot,â that is spreading across the body of the nation, and wonders whether anyone will rise to the task of amputating the infected limbs so as to prevent the life-threatening ailment from spreading any further. In his poem, Liberator editor William Lloyd Garrison expresses empathy for the suffering of slaves who have been deprived of the freedom that is essential to happiness. His speaker asserts that if he were in their shoes, and had to face the pain of being separated from his wife and children, he, too, would rather flee from such conditions. These sentiments serve as a vehicle for Garrisonâs immediatist insistence on abolishing an institution that he suggests binds all Americans in slavery, regardless of their race.
Several other authors assert their commitment to the cause as a means of rallying support. Lowellâs poem written at the antislavery convention held in Boston in 1844 insists that abolitionists will either âperish or be heardâ in their continued attempts to speak out against oppression. The speaker of the anonymous âSong of the Agitatorsâ relies on an insistent trochaic meter to bolster his defiant response to the plea that activists âcease to agitate,â declaring that they will stop doing so only once all men are recognized as equals. And in her poem âOnward!â the prolific black writer Frances Ellen Watkins Harper takes a somewhat different angle to urge anyone who sympathizes with the injuries inflicted on her race to pursue some concrete action, echoing Stillmanâs approach by asking readers to âCome and staunch the wounds that ...