CHAPTER ONE
state within a state
Pity the nation divided into fragments, each fragment deeming itself a nation.
âKAHLIL GIBRAN
In 1979 a coalition of Iranian liberals, leftists, and Islamists overthrew the tyrannical Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlaviâand a new regime more dangerous and brutal than the last took its place.
An alliance of liberals, leftists, and Islamists made sense at first. The Shah oppressed them all more or less equally. But the Iranian Revolution, like so many others before it, devoured its children. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and his Islamists emerged the strong horse in the post-revolutionary struggle for power, and they liquidated the liberals and leftists. Drunk on power and with the wind at its back, his new Islamic Republic regime exploded outward from the ancient Persian heartland into the Arab world with a campaign of imperialism and terrorism.
During the crucible of Lebanonâs civil war in 1982, when Christian, Sunni, Shia, Palestinian, and Druze militias were slugging it out with each other and with the Israelis, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps commanders secretly organized disaffected members of Lebanonâs Shia community into militant cells of their own. They proved that their revolution wasnât only exportable to Shia Muslims who were not Persian; they proved it was durable and resilient.
And it was devastating.
On October 23, 1983, a suicide bomber rammed a Mercedes-Benz truck packed with 12,000 pounds of explosives into the U.S. Marine barracks near Lebanonâs international airport, killing 241 American service members. It was the deadliest single attack against Americans since World War II and the deadliest against the Marine Corps since the Battle of Iwo Jima.
Just two minutes later, France suffered the worst single attack against its forces since the end of the Algerian War. In this attack, fifty-eight paratroopers were killed by another suicide truck bomber near the beach in West Beirutâs Ramlet el Baida.
The French and Americans were neither invaders nor occupiers of Lebanon. They were guests of the government on a peacekeeping mission. Both countries soon withdrew their armed forces, and Lebanon continued to burn for seven more years.
A mysterious group calling itself the Islamic Jihad Organization claimed credit for the attacks. You may never have heard of a terrorist group in Lebanon calling itself Islamic Jihad. Thatâs because it never really existed. Islamic Jihad was simply the nom de guerre of Hezbollah at the time.
Hezbollahâs name in ArabicâHizb Allahâmeans âParty of God.â It also described itself on its logo and flag as the Islamic Revolution in Lebanon.
When the Iranian regime thrust itself into the Arab world, Hezbollah was the tip of its spear, and its leaders werenât shy about saying so. âWe are,â according to Hezbollahâs 1985 Open Letter,1 âthe Party of God (Hizb Allah) the vanguard of which was made victorious by God in Iran.... We obey the orders of one leader, wise and just, that of our tutor and faqih (jurist) who fulfills all the necessary conditions: Ruhollah Musawi Khomeini. God save him!â âDeath to Israelâ and âDeath to Americaâ became its rallying cries, just as they were for the Islamic Republic in Iran.
dp n="39" folio="31" ?Hezbollahâs rhetoric was as brazen as its actions. âWe combat abomination and we shall tear out its very roots,â the manifesto said, meaning âAmerica, its Atlantic Pact allies, and the Zionist entity.â The struggle against Israel, Hezbollah said, âwill end only when this entity is obliterated.â
Syria conquered and occupied most of Lebanon at the end of the civil war, but an Israeli occupation force stayed behind in a narrow strip of land in the south to prevent Hezbollah attacks from the Lebanese side of the border. But in 2000, after more than a decade of grinding counterinsurgency, the worn-out Israelis withdrew their armed forces. Hezbollah had proved itself to be the most powerful guerrilla army in the whole Middle East and the only Arab army of any kind that could plausibly claim victory against Israel.
By the time I moved to Beirut in 2005, Hezbollah was better armed, better trained, and better equipped than even the Lebanese army. With its own de facto state within a state in the suburbs south of Beirut and in South Lebanon along the border with Israel, it was the first and by far the most successful outpost of Khomeinist rule outside Iran.
Its very existence as a militia was illegal under the Taif Agreement 2 that ended the civil war in 1989, and it violated United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559, passed in 2004, that mandated the disarmament of every militia in Lebanon. Hezbollah tried to skirt this by declaring itself no longer a militia but a âresistanceâ army struggling against Israel.
But the Party of God faced enormous pressure to surrender its weapons, as Lebanonâs other militias had already done, and renounce its loyalty to a foreign power. Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah refused to even discuss it. He threatened3 to âcut off any hand that reaches out to our weaponsâ and to âfight them like the martyrs of Karbala.â
Itâs obvious in hindsight that when I decided to relocate to Beirut, I was moving to a country in a state of prewar. It was not, however, obvious at the time. I was a bit more seduced than I should have been by the revolution that had recently forced the withdrawal of the Syrians, but the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon had yet to contend with the Iranian Revolution in Lebanon.
dp n="40" folio="32" ?I stayed in a cheap hotel on the east side of the city while looking for an apartment. While I drove around with my real estate agent in his expensive red sports car, he asked me something out of the blue that I didnât expect. âDo you think Lebanon will be okay?â His voice cracked when he said âokay.â
He seemed confident, even arrogant, most of the time, but all of a sudden he sounded choked up and frightened. It was the first time since I met him that he spoke to me as though I knew more than he did about Lebanon. I didnât, of course. And he knew that. He just wanted me to make him feel better.
I moved to Lebanon partly because I thought his country would be okay, that it might even help the Middle East in general turn out okay in the long run. And I wanted to cover that story from the Arab worldâs freest country.
âI think Lebanon will be okay,â I said.
He seemed to relax slightly, as though I were some sort of sage who had a better feel for the future than he did. But I was wrong.
Lebanese people are educated, talented, and industrious, and they take naturally to freewheeling capitalism. Unlike most Arab countries, Lebanon never went through a suffocating socialist phase where the state owned and controlled most major industries. Beirutâs central government was so weak in 2005 it couldnât even police, let alone stifle, its people or its economy.
There were almost as many Lebanese people in America as there were in Lebanon then. There were even more in Brazil than there were in America. Like Jews and Armenians, they thrived in the Diaspora. Their homeland wasnât as wealthy as it should have been at the time because it had been strangled and looted by Syriaâs Soviet-style regime for so long.
Though less glamorous in the daytime, the port city of Jounieh and the suburbs north of Beirut looked a bit like Hong Kong at night. If Lebanonâs international airport were north of the capital, arriving visitors might have thought they had just landed in a country as modern and prosperous as Israel.
dp n="41" folio="33" ?Instead, the airport is situated south of Beirut, where land is cheap and the snow-capped mountains rise less abruptly from the shoreline. Among the first things visitors saw in 2005, then, were madness and squalor. For the airport was built right next to territory Hezbollah controlled, and everyone had to drive through it to reach the city center.
Even so, the airport road was controlled by the Lebanese government. If you squinted hard enough or paid little attention to the ramshackle housing and billboards portraying Hezbollahâs grinning Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah, you wouldnât necessarily realize what kind of place you were in. There were no checkpoints or militiamen on the sides of the road waving rifles. The hard Hezbollah-controlled core was a bit to the east and mostly out of sight.
Any travelers who ventured off the airport road, however, would quickly find themselves in the middle of the capital of a de facto Iranian satellite state inside Lebanon.
Charles Chuman took me down there. He is a Lebanese American from Chicago who had lived in Beirut for years, and he knew the country better than almost anyone I ever met.
âHezbollah is only ten minutes from here,â he said one night while we walked along pleasant French-looking streets on the Christian side of the city.
I stopped in my tracks. Beirut was an attractive glittering bubble, and I had almost forgotten the stronghold of the Party of God was so close. It was hard to believe a place resembling Gaza was just ten minutes away from the Arab worldâs answer to the French Riviera.
But it was true, and Charles said he would show it to me.
The Hezbollah-controlled suburb of Haret Hreik south of Beirut was known as the dahiyeh, which simply means âsuburb.â There were many suburbs north, east, and south of the city, but everyone in Lebanon knew exactly which was meant by âthe suburbââit was the notorious one, the capital of Hezbollahâs state within a state, where the Party of Godâs command and control center was located.
The U.S. State Department was right to warn American citizens to stay out of there. I had little choice, though, but to ignore the warning and go.
dp n="42" folio="34" ?Charles didnât own a car, but his friend Hassane did. And Hassane said he would be happy to drive me and Charles there if his girlfriend, Rama, could come with us.
I rode in the front seat. Rama and Charles sat in the back. We drove along the civil war-era Green Line dividing predominantly Sunni West Beirut from the mostly Christian east.
Hassane and Rama were Sunnis. Like most in their West Beirut community, they attended the anti-Syrian rally on March 14.
She wore a hijab, an Islamic headscarf, over her hair, and she wore it because she felt like it. Feminists who said she shouldnât frustrated her as much as radical Islamists in Iran and Saudi Arabia who would use their power to force her.
As we drove farther south along the Green Line, Beirut looked less and less prosperous. Gone were the skyscraping steel and glass hotels, the gourmet restaurants where the rich and would-be rich hoped to be seen, and the fashionable clothing stores like those in Milan and Paris. Unassuming churches proliferated on the east side of the road, and the minarets of small community mosques gave the skyline some punch on the west side. Starbucks chains yielded to simpler cafés with plastic chairs. Very little architecture was recognizably French any longer. South Beirut was conservative and a bit hard-bitten, but it was still Beirut.
Then we crossed an invisible line into the dahiyeh, and everything changed.
Hezbollah propaganda was everywhere.
Portraits of suicide bombers and âmartyrsâ killed in battle with Israel hung from the sides of lampposts and electrical poles. A fresh one appeared every couple of feet. The entire urban area was blanketed with the ghostly faces of dead men.
Hassane squinted through the windshield, stuck out his jaw, and gripped the steering wheel hard. âThis isnât my country,â he said.
He had a point.
Lebanese army soldiers and police officers were forbidden from setting foot in the area, as though an invisible international boundary ringed the periphery. Beirutâs government wasnât allowed to operate schools in the dahiyeh, build medical facilities there, or even collect garbage. Hezbollah ruled the roost, and that was final. If the Lebanese army and police tried to retake the area, it would mean war.
I saw hardly any evidence that we were still even in Lebanon. The national flag depicting one of the ancient cedars of Lebanon was nowhere to be seen. The green and yellow Hezbollah flag, with its upraised AK-47 assault rifle logo, had taken its place.
One poster after another portrayed Iranâs Ayatollah Khomeini as though he were the ruler of Lebanon. Portraits of Syriaâs tyrant Bashar al-Assad also made several appearances. The dahiyeh looked, alternately, like a slum of Tehran or Damascus.
Laundry lines slashed across the facades of nondescript concrete apartment blocks that looked like smaller versions of Stalinist towers in communist countries. Large balcony curtains billowed in the wind like dirty ship sails. The tangled mess of electrical wires looked like cobwebs of cable between all the buildings. A few smaller structures heaved over the sidewalks toward the streets as though their fronts were slowly sinking.
Not a single international chain store or restaurant was in sight. No one would have invested foreign capital in the dahiyeh even if Hezbollah would have allowed itâand Hezbollah didnât. Economic globalization reeked of a sinister plot in Hezbollah circles. Those who earned substantial amounts of money independent of the Party of God would no longer need Hezbollahâs social services; could form their own civil society organizations if they wanted; and might, at least in the long run, demand more freedom to operate without stifling controls as Lebanese could elsewhere.
I brought a small tourist camera with me. It easily fit in my pocket, and I could quickly take pictures through the windshield without drawing attention as long as the car wasnât stopped.
âDonât let them see your camera,â Charles said, though his warning was hardly necessary. As we rounded a corner onto a main artery through the area, a stocky militiaman took an AK-47 from the trunk of a car and slung it over his shoulder. He didnât look like the kind of man who would be pleased to appear in my pictures.
Windows in several buildings were sandbagged. Surveillance watchtowers were erected in front of restaurants and stores.
dp n="44" folio="36" ?âTheyâve definitely ramped up the security since the last time I was down here,â Charles said. âTheyâre extremely paranoid now that the country has turned against Syria.â
Much of the construction was illegal and had been built when waves of poor Shias fled north from the Israeli border region to the outskirts of Beirut during the war. Known at that time as the âbelt of miseryâ by Lebanese and as Hooterville4 by U.S. peacekeeping Marines, the area was still one of the poorest and most ramshackle urban places in the country even fifteen years later.
Most of Lebanonâs Shias had always been locked out of the bustling economy and were still locked out in 2005. They had been, for most of their history, simple people who worked the land while Christians and Sunnis in the coastal cities supplied Lebanon with her merchants, traders, and professionals. For Westerners, Beirut was the economic gate to the East, and vice versa. The Shias in the south and in Bekaa Valley were neither needed nor relevant, from Beirutâs point of view. Nor were the Shias, unfamiliar with the city and its ways, really welcome.
Lebanese American historian Fouad Ajami was born and raised a Shia Muslim in the south before his family moved to Beirut when he was a child. Some of his aunts and uncles of an earlier generation tried to build a life for themselves in the city and failed. âBeirut was too harsh and alien for them,â he wrote5 in Beirut: City of Regrets. âIt was a Sunni Muslim world, and the generatio...