The Violence of Austerity

Vickie Cooper, David Whyte

• Publisher: Pluto Press
• Year: 2017
• eBook ISBN: 9781786800633
• Edition: 1
• Topic: Social Sciences
• Subtopic: Sociology
• Index: Social Sciences

Austerity, a response to the aftermath of the financial crisis, continues to devastate contemporary Britain. In The Violence of Austerity, Vickie Cooper and David Whyte bring together the voices of campaigners and academics including Danny Dorling, Mary O'Hara and Rizwaan Sabir to show that rather than stimulating economic growth, austerity policies have led to a dismantling of the social systems that operated as a buffer against economic hardship, exposing austerity to be a form of systematic violence. Covering a range of famous cases of institutional violence in Britain, the book argues that police attacks on the homeless, violent evictions in the rented sector, the risks faced by people on workfare schemes, community violence in Northern Ireland and cuts to the regulation of social protection, are all being driven by reductions in public sector funding. The result is a shocking expose of the myriad ways in which austerity policies harm people in Britain.

PART I

Deadly Welfare

1

Mental Health and Suicide

Mary O’Hara

In the aftermath of the meltdown that was the 2007/08 financial crisis, millions of people – millions of ordinary people on low to moderate incomes – paid an enormous price. They paid that price, however, not just in terms of job losses or employment security and wages, or indeed the loss of their homes and vital services. As savage austerity measures were rolled out in the UK after the crash, huge numbers of people paid the price way beyond their pockets. They paid it with something much more valuable – their mental health.

No matter where in the world you are, look at the research and the evidence is clear: economic strain contributes to mental health difficulties – especially during recessions when unemployment and poverty tend to jump. What’s more, people already living with mental health difficulties are likely to suffer disproportionately in times of recession – not just because funding for services might be cut but also because they are at higher risk of losing their jobs and homes.¹

The so-called age of austerity has shown just how serious and widespread the impact of economic turmoil on mental health could be. One US study found a ‘significant and sustained’ increase in major depression among adults between 2005–06 and 2011–12, during which time millions of Americans lost their jobs and their homes.² Another study exploring the effects of the 2008 financial crash³ reached some stark conclusions. Analysing data from 24 European Union (EU) countries, the USA and Canada, the researchers reported that by 2011, the economic crisis had already led to over 10,000 more suicides than would have been expected – a figure they called a ‘conservative estimate’. The downward trend in suicide rates seen in the EU before 2007 went into reverse when the financial crisis hit, rising 6.5 per cent by 2009. In the USA the rate increased by 4.8 per cent over the same period. Yet the study also showed that the trends were not uniform: many countries did not see any increase in suicide rates. The researchers suggested that a range of interventions – from back-to-work programmes to prescriptions for antidepressants – may reduce the risk of suicide during economic downturns. In the USA, figures published in April 2016 showed a suicide rate at its highest for 30 years with researchers linking⁴ the surge in part to financial woes, poverty and job insecurity.

One study in the UK published in November 2015⁵ concluded that austerity, financial strain and unemployment following the financial crash of 2008 were significant factors in suicide rates. The work, by academics at the Universities of Bristol, Manchester and Oxford, estimated that around 1000 additional deaths by suicide occurred between 2008 and 2010 while something like 30 to 40,000 extra suicide attempts may have taken place.

In their important book, The Body Economic, Sanjay Basu and David Stuckler examined health and economic data over decades, concluding that austerity was bad for both physical and mental health.⁶ ‘If austerity were tested like a medication in a clinical trial, it would have been stopped long ago, given its deadly side effects … One need not be an economic ideologue – we certainly aren’t – to recognise that the price of austerity can be calculated in human lives’, was their damning conclusion in the New York Times. They went on to argue that countries that have chosen stimulus over austerity, such as Germany, Sweden and Iceland, have had better health outcomes than countries such as Greece, Italy and Spain, where austerity measures have been used. ‘If suicides were an unavoidable consequence of economic downturns this would just be another story about the human toll of the Great Recession’, they concluded. ‘But it isn’t so.’

Greece – a country with traditionally lower suicide rates than other European nations – has felt the impact of austerity more than most. A landmark study led by Professor Charles Branas of the University of Pennsylvania incorporated a 30-year month-by-month analysis⁷ of suicides in Greece, ending in 2012. The researchers looked at possible links between suicide data and particular prosperity- and austerity-related events over the three decades, including the acceptance of Greece into the EU, the 2004 Athens Olympic Games and the passing of austerity measures by the government.

While cautious not to link the cause directly to austerity, the researchers found ‘a significant, abrupt and sustained increase’ in suicides following austerity-related events like announcements of spending cuts and violent protests against them. Across the decades studied, 2012 was the peak year for suicides in Greece.

In the UK, from as early as 2011, the charities Sane and the Depression Alliance were reporting concerns about links between financial woes, austerity policies and rising stress and depression.⁸ Many organisations and activists began flagging up how a plethora of local government cuts and welfare reforms such as the Work Capability Assessment were creating unnecessary and sometimes intolerable stress for both physically disabled and mentally ill people.⁹ The Work Capability Assessment in particular was generating widespread tension, according to many frontline welfare workers and campaigners (see Chapter 3 by John Pring and Chapter 4 by Jon Burnett and David Whyte).

Nick Dilworth¹⁰ is a frontline welfare advice worker and long-standing critic of the government’s back-to-work strategy who also monitors and analyses welfare statistics. He summed up the reality of dealing with the consequences: ‘People are coming in with multiple problems. You get grown men crying. What you see are broken lives.’

In addition, sanctions, which were causing significant stress, soared after 2010, while JobCentre workers began speaking out about what they say was an increasingly punitive regime that was adding to the mental stress of both claimants and workers.¹¹ As Angela Neville, a JobCentre worker who went on to write a play about it, explained to me¹² in February 2015: ‘From my own experience, staff are subjected to constant and aggressive pressure to meet and exceed targets. Colleagues would leave team meetings crying.’ On the fallout after sanctions were applied, she said: ‘It was very distressing to have customers literally without food, without heat, without resources – and these are unwell [and] disabled customers.’

Mental health services in the UK are notoriously underfunded and often referred to as a ‘Cinderella service’. According to the Centre for Economic Performance, mental health services receive just 13 per cent of the total NHS budget, while mental illness is responsible for 23 per cent of the loss of years of healthy life caused by all illness nationwide.¹³ Despite this, and despite numerous reassurances from government, services fell foul of austerity policies. Mental health provision was hit hard and early by austerity measures and this pattern has continued into 2016. Figures released in April 2016¹⁴ by the charity Mind revealed that almost half of people (46 per cent) with mental health problems had considered or attempted to take their own life due to social factors such as debt and welfare difficulties.

Despite rising demand for help, including from people in crisis or feeling suicidal who were turning up at A&E departments ill-equipped to provide help, mental health services and the people relying on them were feeling the impact.¹⁵ Organisations from Oxfam to activist groups such as Disabled People Against Cuts and War on Welfare warned of an unprecedented ‘perfect storm’ of falling incomes, rising costs and the removal of vital safety nets, including for mental health and disability, just when the pressure on individuals and families was skyrocketing.¹⁶

The figures back this up. In 2011, three years after the financial crisis, the number of prescriptions for antidepressants rose sharply, up 43 per cent on the previous year.¹⁷ One investigation found that more than 2000 acute mental health beds were lost in England between 2011 and 2013. This meant that many people in crisis who didn’t have a safe place had to be transported hundreds of miles to wherever a bed became available.¹⁸

By 2015, funding for mental health services was estimated to have fallen in real terms by 8.25 per cent over four years.¹⁹ Three quarters of children and young people with a mental health issue could not access treatment when they needed it. Charities warned that this was also storing up problems for the future because it prevented early intervention, something proven to be crucial for young people’s recovery prospects.²⁰ Meanwhile, it was reported that calls to mental health helplines from people citing financial problems shot up in line with personal indebtedness.²¹ GPs reported a surge in patients with stress and anxiety due to worsening economic predicaments and joblessness.²²

When discussing the impacts of austerity in the UK, deaths feature prominently.²³ Like 44-year-old Mark Wood – who was found dead after learning that his benefits were being cut and whose story of struggle drew outrage from campaigners – some of the people who have died had a history of mental health problems. Others didn’t. And there are many, many stories.²⁴ The violence of some of the deaths and distress can be truly shocking. In one case, a man doused himself in petrol outside a JobCentre after being declared fit for work and experiencing benefits delays. Police arrived in time to save him. One woman died two days after trying to take her own life. Her doctor told the inquest that a letter stating that her incapacity benefits were to be withdrawn had precipitated the suicide attempt. A pensioner in his seventies was believed to have killed himself due to fears about the ‘bedroom tax’ (see also Chapter 17 by Kirsteen Paton and Vickie Cooper). Witnesses testified to the inquest that he was frightened by news reports that said people might lose their homes if they couldn’t pay it.

On the frontline of mental health, the stra...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Title
• Copyright
• Contents
• Acknowledgements
• Introduction: The Violence of Austerity
• Part I Deadly Welfare
• Part II Poverty Amplification
• Part III State Regulation
• Part IV State Control
• Notes on Contributors
• Index