CHAPTER 1
HUM
I realize that when I use the word God in the title of this book thereās a good chance Iām stepping on all kinds of land mines. Is there a more volatile word loaded down with more history, assumptions, and expectations than that tired, old, relevant, electrically charged, provocative, fresh, antiquated yet ubiquitous as ever, familiar/unfamiliar word God?
And thatās why I use it.
From people risking their lives to serve the poor because they believe God called them to do it, to pastors claiming that the latest tornado or hurricane or earthquake is Godās judgment, to professors proclaiming that God has only ever been a figment of our imagination, to people in a recovery meeting sitting in a circle drinking bad coffee and talking about surrendering to a higher power, to musicians in their acceptance speech at an awards show thanking God for their hit song about a late-night booty call, when it comes to God, we are all over the place.
Like a mirror, God appears to be more and more a reflection of whoever it is that happens to be talking about God at the moment.
And then there are the latest surveys and polls, the ones telling us how many of us believe and donāt believe in God and how many fewer of us are going to church, inevitably prompting experts to speculate about demographics and technology and worship style and this generation versus that generation, all of it avoiding the glaring truth that sits right there elephant-like in the middle of the room.
The truth is, we have a problem with God.
Itās not just a problem of definitionāwhat is it weāre talking about when we talk about God?āand itās not just the increasing likelihood that two people discussing God are in fact talking about two extraordinarily different realities while using the exact same word.
This problem with God goes much, much deeper.
As a pastor over the past twenty years, what Iāve seen again and again is people who want to live lives of meaning and peace and significance and joyāpeople who have a compelling sense that their spirituality is in some vital and yet mysterious way central to who they areābut who canāt find meaning in the dominant conceptions, perceptions, and understandings of God theyāve encountered. In fact, those conceptions arenāt just failing them but are actually causing harm.
Weāre engaged more than ever by the possibilities of soul and spirit, and by the nagging suspicion that all of this may not be a grand accident after all; but God, an increasing number of people are askingāwhat does God have to do with that?
Iāve written this book about that word, then, because thereās something in the air, weāre in the midst of a massive rethink, a movement is gaining momentum, a moment in history is in the making: there is a growing sense among a growing number of people that when it comes to God, weāre at the end of one era and the start of another, an entire mode of understanding and talking about God dying as something new is being birthed.
Thereās an ancient story about a man named Jacob who had a magnificent dream, and when he wakes up he says, āSurely God was in this place, and I, I wasnāt aware of it.ā
Until now.
The power of the story is its timeless reminder that God hasnāt changed; itās Jacob who wakes up to a whole new awareness of whoāand whereāGod is.
Which brings me back to this moment, to the realization among an increasing number of people that we are waking up in new ways to the God whoās been here the whole time.
Iām aware, to say the least, that talking about this and writing a book about it, naming it and trying to explain it and taking a shot at describing where itās all headed, runs all sorts of risks.
I get that.
Weāre surrounded by friends and neighbors and family and intellectual and religious systems with deeply held, vested interests in the conventional categories and conceptions of belief and denial continuing to remain as entrenched as those traditional conceptions are. There are, as they say, snipers on every roof. And being controversial isnāt remotely interesting.
But love and meaning and joy and hope?
Thatās compelling.
Thatās what Iām after.
Thatās worth the risk.
The great German scholar Helmut Thielicke once said that a person who speaks to this hourās need will always be skirting the edge of heresy, but only the person who risks those heresies can gain the truth.
And the truth is, we have a problemāwe have a needāand thereās always the chance that this may in fact be the hour.
First, then, a bit more about this God problem . . .
When I was twenty, I drove an Oldsmobile.
Remember those?
It was a four-door Delta 88 and it was silver and it had a bench seat across the front with an armrest that folded down and it fit seven or eight people easily and in a feat of engineering genius the rear license plate was on a hinge that you pulled down in order to fill up the gas tank and the trunk was so huge you could put five snowboards in at the same time or a drum set, several guitar amps, and a body if you needed to. (Iām just messing with you there, about the body.) My friends called it āthe Sled.ā
It was a magnificent automobile, the Sled, and it served me well for those years.
But they donāt make Oldsmobiles anymore.
They used to be popular, and your grandparents or roommate may still drive one, but the factories have shut down. Eventually the only ones left will be collectorās items, relics of an era that has passed.
Oldsmobile couldnāt keep up with the times, and so it gradually became part of the past, not the future.
For them, not us.
For then, not now.
I tell you about the Sled I used to drive because for many in our world today, God is like Oldsmobiles. To explain what I mean when I talk about God-like Oldsmobiles, a few stories: my friend Cathi recently told me about an event she attended where an influential Christian leader talked openly about how he didnāt think women should be allowed to teach and lead in the church. Cathi, who has two masterās degrees, sat there stunned.
I got an e-mail from my friend Gary last year, saying that heād decided to visit a church with his family on Easter Sunday. Theyād heard a sermon about how resurrection means everybody who is gay is going to hell.
And then my friend Michael recently told me about hearing the leader of a large Christian denomination say that if you deny that God made the world in a literal six days, you are denying the rest of the Bible as well, because it doesnāt matter what science says.
And then there are the two pastors I know who each told me, within days of the other, how their wives donāt want anything to do with God. Both wives were raised and educated in very religious environments that placed a great deal of importance on the belief that God is good and the point of life is to have a personal relationship with this good God. But both wives have suffered great pain in their young lives, and the clean and neat categories of faith they were handed in their youth havenāt been capable of helping them navigate the complexity of their experiences. And so, like jilted lovers, they have turned away. God, for them, is an awkward, alien, strange notion. Like someone they used to know.
And then thereās the party I attended in New York where I met a well-known journalist who, when he was told that Iām a pastor, wanted to know if all of you pastors use big charts with timelines and graphics to show people when the world is going to end and how Christians are going to escape while those who are left behind endure untold suffering.
I tell you about Cathi sitting there stunned and Gary hearing that sermon and me at that party because whether itās science or art or education or medicine or personal rights or basic intellectual integrity or simply dealing with suffering in all of its complexity, for many in our worldāand this includes Christians and a growing number of pastorsābelieving or trusting in that God, the one theyāve heard other Christians talk about, feels like a step backward, to an earlier, less informed and enlightened time, one that weāve thankfully left behind. Thereās a question that lurks in these stories, a question that an ever-increasing number of people across a broad range of backgrounds and perspectives are asking about God:
Can God keep up with the modern world?
Things have changed. We have more information and technology than ever. Weāre interacting with a far more diverse range of people than we used to. And the tribal God,
the one that is the only one many have been exposed toāthe one whoās always right (which means everybody else is wrong)āis increasingly perceived to be
small,
narrow,
irrelevant,
mean, and sometimes just not that intelligent.
Is God going to be left behind?
Like Oldsmobiles?
For others, it isnāt that God is behind or unable to deal with the complexity of life; for them God never existed in the first place. In recent years weāve heard a number of very intelligent and articulate scientists, professors, and writers argue passionately and confidently that there is no God. This particular faith insists that human beings are nothing more than highly complex interactions of atoms and molecules and neurons, hardwired over time to respond to stimuli in particular ways, feverishly constructing meaning to protect us from the unwelcome truth that there is no ultimate meaning because in the end we are simply the sum of our partsāno more, no less.
That all there is
is, in the end,
all there is.
This denial isnāt anything new, but itās gained a head of steam in recent years, this resurgence seemingly in reaction to the God-like Oldsmobile, the one more and more people are becoming convinced is not only behind, but downright destructive.
I was recently invited to participate in a debate at which the topic was āIs religion good or bad?ā Hereās the kicker: the organizers wanted me to know I was free to choose which side Iād take!
How revealing is that?
All of which brings me to Jane Fonda. (You didnāt see that coming, did you?) Several years ago in an interview she gave to Rolling Stone magazine the interviewer said this:
Your most recentāand perhaps most dramaticātransformation is your becoming a Christian. Even with your flair for controversy, thatās pretty explosive.
Itās a telling statement, isnāt it? You can sense so much there, as if thereās a question behind the question that isnāt really a questionāthat hidden question being what the interviewer really wants to ask her: āWhy would anybody become a Christian?ā
Thatās a question lots of people haveāeducated, reasonable, modern people who find becoming a Christian an āexplosive,ā not to mention an inconceivable, thing to do.
In her response, Jane F...