The Supreme Court and Election Law
eBook - ePub

The Supreme Court and Election Law

Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore

  1. 227 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

The Supreme Court and Election Law

Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore

About this book

In the first comprehensive study of election law since the Supreme Court decided Bush v. Gore, Richard L. Hasen rethinks the Court's role in regulating elections. Drawing on the case files of the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist courts, Hasen roots the Court's intervention in political process cases to the landmark 1962 case, Baker v. Carr. The case opened the courts to a variety of election law disputes, to the point that the courts now control and direct major aspects of the American electoral process.
The Supreme Court does have a crucial role to play in protecting a socially constructed "core" of political equality principles, contends Hasen, but it should leave contested questions of political equality to the political process itself. Under this standard, many of the Court's most important election law cases from Baker to Bush have been wrongly decided.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, you can cancel anytime from the Subscription tab in your account settings on the Perlego website. Your subscription will stay active until the end of your current billing period. Learn how to cancel your subscription.
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Perlego offers two plans: Essential and Complete
  • Essential is ideal for learners and professionals who enjoy exploring a wide range of subjects. Access the Essential Library with 800,000+ trusted titles and best-sellers across business, personal growth, and the humanities. Includes unlimited reading time and Standard Read Aloud voice.
  • Complete: Perfect for advanced learners and researchers needing full, unrestricted access. Unlock 1.4M+ books across hundreds of subjects, including academic and specialized titles. The Complete Plan also includes advanced features like Premium Read Aloud and Research Assistant.
Both plans are available with monthly, semester, or annual billing cycles.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes! You can use the Perlego app on both iOS or Android devices to read anytime, anywhere — even offline. Perfect for commutes or when you’re on the go.
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app.
Yes, you can access The Supreme Court and Election Law by Richard Hasen in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Law & Law Theory & Practice. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

Publisher
NYU Press
Year
2003
Print ISBN
9780814736913
eBook ISBN
9780814773338
Topic
Law
Index
Law

Appendix 1

Twentieth-Century Election Law Cases Decidedby the Supreme Court in a Written Opinion
1901–1910
Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U.S. 487 (1902)
Giles v. Harris, 189 U.S. 475 (1903)
James v. Bowman, 190 U.S. 127 (1903)
Giles v. Teasley, 193 U.S. 146 (1904)
Pope v. Williams, 193 U.S. 621 (1904)
Jones v. Montague, 194 U.S. 147 (1904)
Selden v. Montague, 194 U.S. 153 (1904)
Albright v. Territory of New Mexico ex rel. Sandoval, 200 U.S. 9 (1906)
Burton v. United States, 202 U.S. 344 (1906)
Elder v. Colorado, 204 U.S. 85 (1907)
United States v. Thayer, 209 U.S. 39 (1908)
Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U.S. 487 (1910)
Franklin v. State of South Carolina, 218 U.S. 161 (1910)
1911–1920
Pacific States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Oregon, 223
U.S. 118 (1912)
Marshall v. Dye, 231 U.S. 250 (1913)
Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347 (1915)
Newman v. United States ex rel. Frizzell, 238 U.S. 537 (1915)
Myers v. Anderson, 238 U.S. 377 (1915)
United States v. Mosley, 238 U.S. 383 (1915)
State of Ohio ex rel. Davis v. Hilderbrant, 241 U.S. 565 (1916)
United States v. Gradwell, 243 U.S. 476 (1917)
United States v. Bathgate, 246 U.S. 220 (1918)
1921–1930
Newberry v. United States, 256 U.S. 232 (1921)
Fairchild v. Hughes, 258 U.S. 126 (1922)
Leser v. Garnett, 258 U.S. 130 (1922)
Love v. Griffith, 266 U.S. 32 (1924)
Nixon v. Herndon, 273 U.S. 536 (1927)
Reed v. County Commissioners of Delaware County, Pennsylvania,
277 U.S. 376 (1928)
Barry v. United States ex rel. Cunningham, 279 U.S. 597 (1929)
United States v. Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396 (1930)
1931–1940
Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355 (1932)
Koenig v. Flynn, 285 U.S. 375 (1932)
Carroll v. Becker, 285 U.S. 380 (1932)
Nixon v. Condon, 286 U.S. 73 (1932)
Wood v. Broom, 287 U.S. 1 (1932)
Burroughs v. United States, 290 U.S. 534 (1934)
Grovey v. Townsend, 295 U.S. 45 (1935)
United States v. Norris, 300 U.S. 564 (1937)
Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937)
Lane v. Wilson, 307 U.S. 268 (1939)
1941–1950
United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941)
Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1 (1944)
McDonald v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 323 U.S. 57 (1944)
Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944)
U.S. v. Saylor, 322 U.S. 385 (1944)
Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946)
United States v. C.I.O., 335 U.S. 106 (1948)
MacDougall v. Green, 335 U.S. 281 (1948)
South v. Peters, 339 U.S. 276 (1950)
1951–1960
Gerende v. Election Board, 341 U.S. 56 (1951)
Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. Missouri, 342 U.S. 421 (1952)
United States v. Hood, 343 U.S. 148 (1952)
Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 214 (1952)
Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953)
United States v. UAW-CIO, 352 U.S. 567, (1957)
Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America v. WDAY, 360 U.S. 525 (1959)
Lassiter v. Northhampton Election Board, 360 U.S. 45 (1959)
United States v. Raines, 362 U.S. 17 (1960)
United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 (1960)
United States v. Alabama, 362 U.S. 602 (1960)
Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420 (1960)
Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 (1960)
1961–1970
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
Scholle v. Hare, 369 U.S. 429 (1962)
Wood v. Georgia, 370 U.S. 375 (1962)
Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963)
Anderson v. Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964)
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964)
Wright v. Rockefeller, 376 U.S. 52 (1964)
Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)
WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo, 377 U.S. 633 (1964)
Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, 377 U.S. 656 (1964)
Davis v. Mann, 377 U.S. 678 (1964)
Roman v. Sincock, 377 U.S. 695 (1964)
Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U.S. 713 (1964)
Fortson v. Dorsey, 379 U.S. 433 (1965)
Fortson v. Toombs, 379 U.S. 621 (1965)
Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 (1965)
United States v. Mississippi, 380 U.S. 128 (1965)
Louisiana v. United States, 380 U.S. 145 (1965)
Harman v. Forssenius, 380 U.S. 528 (1965)
Parsons v. Buckley, 379 U.S. 359 (1965)
Scott v. Germano, 381 U.S. 407 (1965)
WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo, 382 U.S. 4 (1965)
Swann v. Adams, 383 U.S. 210 (1966)
South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966)
Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966)
Burns v. Richardson, 384 U.S. 73 (1966)
Mills v. Alabama, 384 U.S. 214 (1966)
Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641 (1966)
United States v. Johnson, 383 U.S. 169 (1966)
Cardona v. Power, 384 U.S. 672 (1966)
Bond v. Floyd, 385 U.S. 116 (1966)
Fortson v. Morris, 385 U.S. 231 (1966)
Swann v. Adams, 385 U.S. 440 (1967)
Kilgarlin v. Hill, 386 U.S. 120 (1967)
Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97 (1967)
Zwicker v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241 (1967)
Sailors v. Board of Education of the County of Kent, 387 U.S. 105 (1967)
Lucas v. Rhodes, 389 U.S. 212 (1967)
Rockefeller v. Wells, 389 U.S. 421 (1967)
Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968)
Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 (1968)
Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1969)
Hadnott v. Amos, 394 U.S. 358 (1969)
Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526 (1969)
Wells v. Rockefeller, 394 U.S. 542 (1969)
McDonald v. Board of Election Commissioners, 394 U.S. 802 (1969)
Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814 (1969)
Gaston County v. United States, 395 U.S. 285 (1969)
Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486 (1969)
Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15, 395 U.S. 621 (1969)
Cipriano v. City of Houma, 395 U.S. 701 (1969)
Brockington v. Rhodes, 396 U.S. 41 (1969)
Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. 103 (1969)
In re Herndon, 394 U.S. 399 (1969)
Hall v. Beals, 396 U.S. 45 (1969)
Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas City, 397
U.S. 50 (1970)
Mitchell v. Donovan, 398 U.S. 427 (1970)
City of Phoenix v. Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970)
Turner v. Fouche, 396 U.S. 346 (1970)
Evans v. Cornman, 398 U.S. 419 (1970)
Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970)
1971–1980
Perkins v. Matthews, 400 U.S. 379 (1971)
Connor v. Johnson, 402 U.S. 690 (1971)
W...

Table of contents

  1. Cover Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright Page
  4. Dedication
  5. Contents
  6. Preface
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. Introduction
  9. The Supreme Court of Political Equality
  10. Judicial Unmanageability and Political Equality
  11. Protecting the Core of Political Equality
  12. Deferring to Political Branches on Contested Equality Claims
  13. Equality, Not Structure
  14. Conclusion: Political Equality and a Minimalist Court
  15. Appendix 1: Twentieth-Century Election Law Cases Decided by the Supreme Court in a Written Opinion
  16. Appendix 2: Justice Goldberg’s Proposed Dissent to a Per Curiam Summary Affirmance in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections
  17. Notes
  18. Index
  19. About the Author
  20. Footnote