NOTES
PREFACE
1. Calendar of State Papers. Colonial Series. America and the West Indies, 5:636, 7:236; Interesting Tracts Relating to the Island of Jamaica Consisting of Curious State Papers, Councils of War, Letters, Petitions, Narratives, etc…. from Its Conquest, Down to the Year 1702 (St. Jago de la Vega [Spanish Town], Jamaica, 1800), p. 116.
INTRODUCTION
1. For a comprehensive account of the trials and condemnation, see Arthur N. Gilbert, “The Africaine Courts-Martial: A Study of Buggery and the Royal Navy,” Journal of Homosexuality 1 (1974): 111–122.
2. More complete discussions of societal reaction theory are found in Kenneth Plummer, Sexual Stigma: An Interactionist Perspective (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975), pp. 1–92; Edwin M. Schur, Labeling Deviant Behavior: Its Sociological Implications (New York: Harper and Row, 1971). For a short discussion of societal reaction theory and its uses in dealing with homosexuality, see John I. Kitsuse, “Societal Reaction to Deviant Behavior: Problems of Theory and Method,” Social Problems 9 (Winter, 1962): 247–256. For analysis of societal reaction theory and its relation to historical research see Kenneth Kenniston, “Psychological Developments and Historical Change,” in Explorations in Psychohistory, ed. Robert Jay Lifton (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1974), pp. 149–164; despite the title, Robert F. Berkhofer, Jr.’s A Behavioral Approach to Historical Analysis (New York: Free Press, 1969) also contains a fine discussion of societal reaction theory in Chapter II. An example of societal reaction as a base for historical analysis can be found in Kai T. Erikson’s Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance (New York: Wiley, 1966).
1. SODOMY AND PUBLIC PERCEPTION: SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND
1. Peter Laslett, The World We Have Lost (New York: Scribners, 1965).
2. Frederick Pollock and Frederic W. Maitland, The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1895), 2:554–555; A.L. Rowse, Homosexuals in History: A Study of Ambivalence in Society, Literature and the Arts (New York: Macmillan, 1977), pp. 24–25; J.S. Cockburn, A History of the English Assizes, I558-I7J4 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972), pp. 127–133; J.H. Baker, “Criminal Courts and Procedure at Common Law, 1550–1800,” Crime in England, 1550–1800 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977), pp. 43–44; M.J. Ingram, “Communities and Courts: Law and Disorder in Early Seventeenth-Century Wiltshire,” ibid., p. 110. For an excellent survey of assorted sexual practices during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, see Vern L. Bullough’s compendious Sexual Variance in Society and History (New York: Wiley, 1976), Chapter XVI. H. Montgomery Hyde’s The Other Love, An Historical and Contemporary Survey of Homosexuality in Britain (London: Heinemann, 1970) is also exceedingly useful; Hyder Rollins and Herschel Baker, “Richard Barnfield,” in The Renaissance in England (Boston: D.C. Heath, 1954), pp. 396–397.
3. Anthony Fitzherbert, Loffice et Auctority de Iustices de Peace (London, 1606), folio 50; William Lambarde, Eirenarcha, or Of The Office of the Justices of Peace in Foure Bookes (London, 1610), pp. 224–225; Retha M. Wamicke, William Lambarde, Elizabethan Antiquary (London: Phillimore, 1973), pp. 61, 70–72; Lambarde’s same absence of concern was evident in Michael Dalton’s Countrey Justice published over half a century later in 1655. Dalton barely touched on the crime, although he did extend it to include sex acts involving only women and several unspecified heterosexual practices (pp. 340–341); Sir Edward Coke, The Third Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England (London, 1644), pp. 58–59; Coke, The Twelfth Part of the Reports of Sir Edward Coke (London, 1658), pp. 36–37.
4. A.L. Rowse, Homosexuals in History, pp. 48–66.
5. Ibid., p. 67; Lawrence Stone, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800 (New York: Harper, 1977), pp. 492–493.
6. Chester Quarter Sessions 21/3, p. 174a.
7. [Anon.], The Tryal and Condemnation of Mervin, Lord Audley Earl of Castle-Haven (London, 1699).
8. Ibid., p. 9.
9. Ibid., p. 4.
10. Ibid., pp. 10–12. On sodomy indictments see also the anonymously written Faithful Narrative of the Proceedings in a Late Affair … to which is Prefixed A Particular Account of the Proceedings Against Robert Thistlethwayte for a Sodomical Attempt upon Mr. W. French (London, 1739), p. 30.
11. [Anon.], Tryal and Condemnation of… Lord Audley, pp. 22–31.
12. There is no evidence in accounts of the trial to indicate the execution of Castlehaven’s two servants is proof, as one authority contends, of the revulsion toward sodomy held by members of the court. See Caroline Bingham, “Seventeenth-Century Attitudes Toward Deviant Sex,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 1 (Spring 1971): 463–465. Even though Bingham suggests homosexuality was considered an abomination early in the century, she concedes, significantly, that this was not the case seventy years later (ibid., pp. 464–468).
13 Nicholas Bernard, The Penitent Death of John Atherton (Dublin, 1641), p. 15.
14. Ibid., pp. 15, 26, et passim; Atherton’s accuser was hanged some days or weeks before Atherton (ibid., p. 26); DNB, I, pp. 689–690.
15. John White, The First Century of Scandalous, Malignant Priests (London, 1643), preface, pp. A2 (recto, verso), A3, 1–2, 11, 23–24, 28; [Lionel Gatford], Public Good Without Private Interest (London, 1657), p. 16.
16. William Wycherly, The Country Wife, in The Complete Plays of William Wycherly, ed. Gerald Weales (New York: New York University Press, 1966), Act III, scene 1.
17. Thomas Killigrew, The Parson’s Wedding in Comedies and Tragedies by Thomas Killigrew (London, 1664), Act I, scene 2.
18. Ibid., Act I, scene 1.
19. Ibid., Act III, scene 5.
20. Ibid., Act II, scene 7; Act I, scene 3.
21. Ibid., Act II, scene 2.
22. Montague Summers, Introduction to Restoration Comedies (London: Jonathan Cape, 1921) p. xxxi.
23. Charles Johnson, The Successful Pyrate (London, 1713).
24. John Wilmot, Second Earl of Rochester, “A Satyr on King Charles II,” in Collected Works of John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, ed. John Hayward (London: Nonesuch Press, 1926), p. 104.
25. London Gazette, November 22–25, 1680.
26. Wilmot, Sodom or the Quintessence of Debauchery (Paris: Olympia Press, 1957), Act V, scene 2.
27. Samuel Pepys, The Diary of Samuel Pepys, eds. Robert Latham and William Matthews (Berkeley: University of California Press, (1970– ), 9: 2, 247, 293. This was apparently true even into the next century (J. Jean Hecht, The Domestic Servant Class in Eighteenth-Century England [London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956), pp. 201–204).
28. William Prynne, Histrio-Mastix: The Players Scourge (London, 1633), pp. 75–76.
29. Ibid., p. 211.
30. Ibid., pp. 208–214.
31. Ibid., p. 135.
32. Arthur Bedford, The Evil and Danger of Stage Plays Showing Their Natural Tendency to Destroy Religion and Induce a General Corruption of Manners (London, 1706), p. 139; “Copies of Several Presentments of the Grand Juries, Against the Play House Lately Erected in the City of Bristol” (1704–1706), in Bedford, Evil and Danger of Stage Plays, pp. 222–227; Middlesex County Records, Calendar of Session Books, 1689–1709, ed. W.J. Hardy (London: Richard Nicholson, 1905), p. 347; John Dennis, The Critical Works of John Dennis, ed. Edward N. Hooker (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1943), I, 153, 156, 473, II, 311, 314, 315, 396, 510–511; Dudley W.R. Bahlman, The Moral Revolution of 1688 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1957), pp. 4–5.
33. Pepys, Diary, 3: 159–160. Neither did Mrs. Pepys accept the notions of sexual promiscuity common to the court. Exceedingly jealous, she raged at her husband’s infidelities, real and imagined, almost destroying their marriage (ibid., 9: 337–338 ff.).
34. Ibid., 8: 596.
35. Ibid., 4: 209.
36. Ibid.
37. Ibid., 4: 210.
38. Ibid., 3: 66, 206–207, 4: 382.
39. John Evelyn, The Diary of John Evelyn, ...