chapter 1
What Costovation Is and Why It Matters
Aside from its electrifying bright purple and yellow decor, Planet Fitness looks like any other gym: There are rows and rows of elliptical machines and treadmills. Thereâs a basic locker room. The current top-40 hits are pumping over the speakers.
But on closer inspection, youâll notice that there is actually a lot missing from this gym. There are no studios for yoga or spinning. There isnât a heavy-free-weight section. There arenât even any personal trainers. In fact, Planet Fitness forgoes many common gym features, such as:
⢠Towels
⢠A pool
⢠A basketball court
⢠Childcare
⢠Steam rooms, hot tubs, and saunas
⢠Free Wi-Fi
Even the typical gym-membership price tag is missing: while the average gym charges $52 a month, a basic Planet Fitness membership costs just $10.1
But Planet Fitness is not simply a story of a company trying to make a quick buck by slashing services and lowering prices. To understand the secret of Planet Fitnessâs success, we need to look at how lowering costs and simplifying services can be a deliberate innovation strategyâone whose aim is to make the fitness experience more satisfying to its customers, not less.
Planet Fitness members donât feel shortchanged by their barebones gym. They love that there are rows and rows of cardio machines, which means that they never have to wait to start their workout. And they donât miss the heavy weights: Planet Fitnessâs target customers donât care for those anyway. Lunchtime workouts are stress free without personal trainers trying to sell them services. The Planet Fitness model is cheaper to run than anything else on the market, but it still ranks first in customer satisfactionâeven ahead of luxury giants like Equinox.2 And the company keeps growing; at last count, Planet Fitness boasted over 7.3 million members working out in over 1,100 North American locations.
This is a company that has made careful, and sometimes difficult, choices to have a simple, low-cost offering. Along the way, it sacrificed temptations that lure other gym chainsâsuch as personal trainers, a highly profitable add-on service that for most gyms brings in close to 10% of total revenue, or passive sources of income like rent from massage and physical therapists.3
Planet Fitnessâs success highlights an underappreciated approach to innovation: purposefully offering less as a way to satisfy more. Rather than trying to compete in the overcrowded luxury fitness field, with its lavish services and hefty price tags, Planet Fitness found opportunity with a customer segment that most gyms rule out as unprofitableâcasual and first-time exercisers. It then focused on a handful of things that these customers most prize, such as offering reliable workout equipment, with 24/7 access, at consistently low rates. Thatâs all. The company chops out the usual profit-making mechanisms adored by the industry. It seeks customers most gyms avoid, because its low operating costs make those customers far more attractive to it than to rival chains. While the rest of the fitness industry continues to plow upmarket, Planet Fitness forges its own very successful path with a no-nonsense business model that delights its boardroom as much as its customers.
This is low-cost innovation, or costovation, hard at work.
What Is Costovation?
Costovation is a type of innovation that significantly compresses costs while still wowing customers. Itâs about meeting or exceeding customer expectations with less. Planet Fitness with its low costs and slim offeringsâbut ecstatic customersâis an example of costovation. Ryanair, an ultra-budget European airline which at one time tried to charge customers for drinking water and bathroom use, is not. The difference is in customer experience. Ryanair tickets can be a grudge purchase, and purchases made with gritted teeth donât often lead to ever-thriving companies.
To get a better sense of costovation, letâs look at an example from the hospitality industry. If youâve ever been stuck on a six-hour layover, you know your options for comfort are bare: you can get in line for a shuttle to a local airport hotel (and plunk down your credit card for an entire nightâs stay), or you can cozy up to a worn-out chair in the airport terminal. Both of those options are depressingly unappealing, especially for the frequent traveler. Enter Yotel.
Yotel is a hotel chain found in international airports like Londonâs Heathrow and New Yorkâs JFK. Accommodations are often directly on-site within airport terminals, and rooms are extraordinarily small, fitting just a bed and an airplane-like bathroom. But for time-conscious travelers, Yotel offers exactly what they craveâa comfortable bed, an excellent shower, strong Wi-Fi, proximity to their next flight, and fast check-in.
Yotel doesnât really offer much more than that, yet itâs become quite popular with experienced travelers. This travel segment is not looking for extra amenities such as a tub, a gym, or a pool. And by keeping things simple, Yotelâs back-end operations can be exceptionally lean. It uses automated kiosks for check-in and food vending, and it makes the most of its prime real estate by shrinking room sizes to tiny pod-like cabins. These cost savings enable Yotel to offer rooms that are much cheaper than a typical hotelâcheap enough that travelers use it during long layovers. At the same time, Yotel exceeds competitive offerings in critical ways, such as by providing monsoon showers for customers looking to de-grime after a long flight. Yotel runs a low-cost model, but it still nails the core needs of long-haul travelers looking for a quick place to rest and freshen up.
Many industries need a Yotelâa company that excels at offering something at a radically lower price, for a well-defined customer set. Weâve seen an increasing number of costovations in recent years, and as weâll soon see, they are often enviably simple in nature.
Innovation and Simplicity
Innovation is typically thought to mean more: more flavors, more options, more features. What makes costovation so radical is that it flips this understanding on its head and says that sometimes the winning approach is to do less.
McDonaldâs is a great example of how a less-is-more approach might have worked better. In 2004, the fast-food giant had 69 permanent items on its menu. A decade later, it had 145.4 This 110% increase was rooted in a genuine desire to keep up with trends and give customers the variety they seemed to want. Diversifying its menu was an important part of McDonaldâs strategy to stay fresh, relevant, and exciting.
But expanding the menu so quickly added tremendous complexity to McDonaldâs operations. To accommodate the McWrap, for instance, supply-chain managers had to source a steady annual supply of 6 million pounds of English cucumbers (not an easy feat!). Staff that were used to assembling burgers had to be trained to make a McWrap and maneuver it into its specially designed container in under 60 seconds, with just the right amount of lettuce and chicken peeking out from the top.5 Kitchen bottlenecks were further caused by limited-time-offerings items like Fish McBites, Steak & Egg Burritos, and White Chocolate Mochas. In 2013, Chief Operating Officer Tim Fenton told analysts that the chain had âovercomplicatedâ its menu by adding âtoo many new products, too fast. . . . We didnât give the restaurants a chance to breathe.â6 Two years later, McDonaldâs ran into the same problem again when it rolled out all-day breakfast, which cramped kitchen quarters as staff jostled to put an increasing number of food items onto limited grill space.7
Contrast that with Chipotle, a popular Mexican restaurant that McDonaldâs partially owned until 2006. Chipotle has offered virtually the same 25-ingredient menu since the company was founded over two decades ago. Customers mix and match these 25 ingredients to create custom meals, allowing Chipotle to win on freshness and personalization while also reducing complexity in its kitchens and in its supply chain.
Chipotleâs strategy countered industry wisdom. The restaurant chain rejected limited-time offerings to boost sales and passed up low-risk/high-profit items such as coffee and cookies. They determinedly stuck to their modest menu and found a way to make it fresh and interesting to the everyday consumer. Despite its streamlined offerings, Chipotle is actually priced higher than McDonaldâsâshowing that you can be upmarket, low-cost, and simple all at the same time.
Companies donât deliberately set out to make things complicated. But more often than not, they find themselves grappling with convoluted solutions to pressing problems that donât quite get them where they want to go. The mindset that âsuccess is a function of doing moreâ so dominates how companies do business that going simple is rarely treated as a viable option. And, if paring things down does happen, itâs typically through a cost-cutting campaign that has no innovation remit whatsoever.
Costovation defies this established thinking and suggests that big innovations can come from decluttering how you think, the way you do things, and what you offer. This book takes you through the nuts and bolts of how to costovate, and helps you decide when costovation is the right strategy for your organization.
Why Consider Costovation?
There are a lot of reasons why companies would want to costovate. Some are trying to surprise their competition or open up markets in industries that seem stale. Others use costovation to insulate themselves from the threat of disruptive innovation, or to build resilience against macroeconomic headwinds. Taking a birds-eye view of the field of costovation, here are three main reasons for why costovation repeatedly appears:
Cost-cutting is never easy, and thereâs no more fat to trim. Costovation is a different approach to cost-cutting. Here, cost-cutting is not the overall mandate, but rather a happy byproduct in the journey toward being truly customer-centric.
Why is this important? Companies have become extraordinarily adept at squeezing blood from stone, eliminating costs large and small whenever the mandate is givenâoften from areas such as administrati...